![]() |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 2958440)
IA calls going out in mid jan... oooh wee, things are going to get fun. :)
|
Am I the only one that thinks the company doesn’t even have an “opener”? If I’m Ed I’m looking at simply extending the deal with a few % per year at most. I wouldn’t be looking to blow anything apart.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2953919)
28 million is again a meaningless number until the company provides their table positions for the pay, scheduling, retirement and vacation sections which contain 90% of the direct dollar value of the contract.
It is a laughable amount of improvements and walking away from the table after meetings schedule has been agreed on is a lousy thing to do by the company. |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 2954118)
Word on the street is the Union's opener is a $4 Billion or 100% PWA cost increase. I think we know what the NMB's response will be as does the Company
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk We should ask for 300% increase and then settle down somewhere between 300% and 28 million! |
The dudes are buying time for some reason.
|
Originally Posted by badflaps
(Post 2960471)
The dudes are buying time for some reason.
Time=Less money for pilots (start the Time Value of Money thread derail) Management likes money. Therefore, management wants more time. To get more time they are buying it... cheap. |
Originally Posted by badflaps
(Post 2960471)
The dudes are buying time for some reason.
We're asking the company to fatten up a lean operation so we have the staffing required for better pilot QOL. If pilot hiring ever catches up and the 737 MAX returns to flying, we may have the necessary staffing for the QOL improvements we are seeking. |
Originally Posted by Gunfighter
(Post 2960498)
There is no retro for QOL and scope. Those are two major areas of the contract we are asking for gains. They need to kick the can past the summer before improving those areas otherwise the operation will collapse. The good news is that Delta is expecting us to have QOL improvements.
So getting through just this summer doesn't seem like the reason. Also if its tue that they slid a POS section 23 across the table with even the smallest of concessions as some are saying, they may really think we're dumb enough (or can be bullied through the threat of lost TVM) to give them more prodctivity (aka QOL hits) to get whatever 6/3/3 they think we'll bite off on. Nope. QOL has to improve and much of it has to undo the QOL shredding optimizer "we didn't think they'd do that" hits that have occured since the last contract. Now your other point about them simply pocketing their designed delay of QOL impovements is certainly valid. Those private islands aren't going to buy themelves. |
Originally Posted by badflaps
(Post 2960471)
The dudes are buying time for some reason.
Or the company can drag their feet indefinitely and save $200K for every pilot that retires prior to an eventual agreement. Given the large retirements ongoing, and scheduled to accelerate, now comes the inevitable "gee I can't imagine WHY the company would want to drag their feet." What's amusing is the idea that all the upcoming retirements and associated training "crisis" somehow gave us lots of leverage. Even if true (and I am not buying it) the retirement proposal eviscerated that hypothetical leverage. We're in for the long haul now. I'm glad we were wise enough to reject TA1, and also wise enough to ratify TA2. |
Originally Posted by Herkflyr
(Post 2960513)
There's no doubt, but it's not "some" reason. It's the ridiculous, "let's give senior captains a large lump sum payment as they walk out the door" idea.
Or the company can drag their feet indefinitely and save $200K for every pilot that retires prior to an eventual agreement. Given the large retirements ongoing, and scheduled to accelerate, now comes the inevitable "gee I can't imagine WHY the company would want to drag their feet." What's amusing is the idea that all the upcoming retirements and associated training "crisis" somehow gave us lots of leverage. Even if true (and I am not buying it) the retirement proposal eviscerated that hypothetical leverage. We're in for the long haul now. I'm glad we were wise enough to reject TA1, and also wise enough to ratify TA2. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:23 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands