![]() |
I’d be happy to see a BOS base. Fewer mid trip redeyes and 5am shows.
|
Originally Posted by marcal
(Post 3470793)
I’m hoping it’s not soon bc BOS is a great layover and lots of that will go away with a base. From a seniority standpoint though it would be good to have the New Englanders leave NYC.
|
Do you all anticipate a 320 base over 737?
|
Originally Posted by RedBull
(Post 3472494)
Do you all anticipate a 320 base over 737?
|
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
(Post 3472504)
yes. I think the company has stated it will be a 320 base first, with more aircraft added later
|
Originally Posted by badflaps
(Post 3472604)
Amazing.... They had '76's there 35 years ago.... Full mostly.
How many in the dump truck? |
Originally Posted by ancman
(Post 3470492)
Adding a couple 320 bases in MCO, MIA/FLL, or AUS/SAT would be wise on the company’s part for pilot recruitment. Most highly qualified applicants have their pick of any major airline right now. Basing becomes the #1 deciding factor for most of them.
|
Originally Posted by JSDL
(Post 3470483)
How do you all see a BOS 320/330 base shaking up the seniority in the other bases? NY becomes ridiculously Jr in both seats? How about the other bases?
|
Originally Posted by Tinpusher007
(Post 3472957)
AUS/SAT is definitely a pipe dream at this point; we have all but given up on even making AUS a focus city anymore after AA has swooped in and eaten our lunch there. It would have been great but I just dont see it happening. Look how long its taking BOS to open after we have actually declared it a hub and followed through with a lot of growth. AUS is basically just served from the hubs and at this point I doubt we have the necessary capacity to try and compete with AA there or WN for that matter.
That said, I don’t think smaller 320 bases in non-hub cities with significant amounts of service would be completely unviable, particularly as our NB fleets consolidate. Crew resources has alluded to it before. I don’t know that we’ll ever see it with our current management team though. |
Originally Posted by Tinpusher007
(Post 3472962)
This is certainly my hope, being a native NYer; BOS would for sure pull a lot of senior pilots from NYC who live in the New England area. At only 5.5 yrs I can hold left seat on everything in NYC up through 7ER; 764 (I hate saying 765) and 330 remain super senior. Im anxious to see how BOS opening would change the seniority dynamic for NYC.
|
Any news on Boston?
|
Originally Posted by RedBull
(Post 3490164)
Any news on Boston?
|
Originally Posted by RedBull
(Post 3490164)
Any news on Boston?
|
Originally Posted by RedBull
(Post 3490164)
Any news on Boston?
|
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 2986560)
I wouldn't be suprised to see it as a 330 base at some point.
|
Pretty sure the lease has been signed for the ‘office space’, timing to be determined…
|
Originally Posted by LEROY JENKINS
(Post 3490232)
Based on the 330 flying in Boston now I doubt a 330 base. It's to easy to build 6 day trips through Boston and eliminate credit time for the NYC base by combining a long leg (ATH, TLV, FCO) with a short leg (AMS, DUB, LHR). 6+ day trips out of NYC have at least tripled since Boston expansion.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3490310)
Before they will open a 330 base in Boston the flying has to support it year round. Currently there are plenty of 330 departures to support a base in the summer. Not sure about the winter.
|
Originally Posted by LEROY JENKINS
(Post 3490232)
Based on the 330 flying in Boston now I doubt a 330 base. It's to easy to build 6 day trips through Boston and eliminate credit time for the NYC base by combining a long leg (ATH, TLV, FCO) with a short leg (AMS, DUB, LHR). 6+ day trips out of NYC have at least tripled since Boston expansion.
|
Originally Posted by Funk
(Post 3490578)
The problem with those 6 day trips (that flight ops "leadership" refuses to learn) is that two six day trips are all that can be awarded to a line holder to meet the construction window, after that, they can't be added via WS, and any WB B halfway aware knows not to have 6 days of LC available with six day trips in open time. These were the primo trips to roll thunder this last summer, especially because many were broken into two 4 day trips and handed out as GS. Fourth floor spreadsheet ninjas know what's best though.
|
Originally Posted by Funk
(Post 3490578)
The problem with those 6 day trips (that flight ops "leadership" refuses to learn) is that two six day trips are all that can be awarded to a line holder to meet the construction window, after that, they can't be added via WS, and any WB B halfway aware knows not to have 6 days of LC available with six day trips in open time. These were the primo trips to roll thunder this last summer, especially because many were broken into two 4 day trips and handed out as GS. Fourth floor spreadsheet ninjas know what's best though.
|
Any new updates on if/when BOS will be announced with what equipment will be first there?
|
Originally Posted by Rcordeiro122592
(Post 3496508)
Any new updates on if/when BOS will be announced with what equipment will be first there?
Therefore it won't be the A320, and instead, at the last possible minute, it'll be whatever soon to go away fleet that's getting new interiors (764, 717, ER?) only to be closed a year or two later to generate the MD's necessary for another beloved 365 to provide the flexibility to power out of the very manning crisis that opening then closing a base caused in the first place. Canihaz MIP? |
So when is that AUS CP opening happening.
|
Originally Posted by PSpuza
(Post 3496602)
So when is that AUS CP opening happening.
|
Originally Posted by 24Whiskey
(Post 3496689)
You might want to ask that on the AA forum.
|
Originally Posted by PSpuza
(Post 3496727)
Right? DL definitely got caught on the back foot for that one.
AA is now up to almost 50 non-stop destinations from AUS. But hey, we really flexed our strength there by adding a couple of A220 flights to SEA and BOS. |
At the NYC Flt Ops Town hall this week, BS said to expect BOS on the AE after summer of 23.
|
Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF
(Post 3507042)
At the NYC Flt Ops Town hall this week, BS said to expect BOS on the AE after summer of 23.
shiny base syndrome How many years have we been hearing about a return of the BOS base? 10 at least. Most of the previous BOS folks are retired now. |
Originally Posted by notEnuf
(Post 3507050)
SBS
shiny base syndrome How many years have we been hearing about a return of the BOS base? 10 at least. Most of the previous BOS folks are retired now. If/when JB decides that operating international from BOS and JFK won't work, then a BOS base will go back on a back burner faster than last weeks dinner. A plethora of events could happen between now and the end of next summer (many of which haven't even been thought of yet) that could/would change this declaration. |
Originally Posted by nene
(Post 3507140)
Yes indeed, this reeks of "free beer tomorrow sign"
If/when JB decides that operating international from BOS and JFK won't work, then a BOS base will go back on a back burner faster than last weeks dinner. A plethora of events could happen between now and the end of next summer (many of which haven't even been thought of yet) that could/would change this declaration. |
I have CJO's with AA and DL, and my main goal is to be BOS-based. I know no one has a crystal ball, but can anyone attempt to quantify their confidence in DL opening BOS this summer-ish?
For example, I've read that there's construction at Terminal A, that they've ID'd staff and the Chief Pilot, etc. Are there any other clues or indications? I would like to go with DL, but unless DL makes BOS 'official,' I'd feel compelled to go with AA. The thought of telling DL 'TBNT' potentially only mere months from them announcing BOS is a bit nauseating. Thanks in advance to anyone who's got some info/advice. |
Originally Posted by UtahGetMe2
(Post 3507428)
I have CJO's with AA and DL, and my main goal is to be BOS-based. I know no one has a crystal ball, but can anyone attempt to quantify their confidence in DL opening BOS this summer-ish?
For example, I've read that there's construction at Terminal A, that they've ID'd staff and the Chief Pilot, etc. Are there any other clues or indications? I would like to go with DL, but unless DL makes BOS 'official,' I'd feel compelled to go with AA. The thought of telling DL 'TBNT' potentially only mere months from them announcing BOS is a bit nauseating. Thanks in advance to anyone who's got some info/advice. I suspect it will become a base as they don’t seem inclined to cede any market share from there and it’s a competitive focus not to mention jfk is almost back to full capacity so additional pond crossings may be supportable. That being said choosing any airline solely on an adjunct base is generally risky. BOS will always be up the road from JFK so any disturbance to the force in the future could cause any airline to retreat to jfk with ample connectivity to Bos. |
Originally Posted by UtahGetMe2
(Post 3507428)
I have CJO's with AA and DL, and my main goal is to be BOS-based. I know no one has a crystal ball, but can anyone attempt to quantify their confidence in DL opening BOS this summer-ish?
For example, I've read that there's construction at Terminal A, that they've ID'd staff and the Chief Pilot, etc. Are there any other clues or indications? I would like to go with DL, but unless DL makes BOS 'official,' I'd feel compelled to go with AA. The thought of telling DL 'TBNT' potentially only mere months from them announcing BOS is a bit nauseating. Thanks in advance to anyone who's got some info/advice. I’d say it is extremely likely. They were no-kidding going to do it before Covid, and had actually hired the Chief Pilot and leased space at BOS for lounge/CPO. The ONLY reason it didn’t happen was Covid. Now, the delay is due to the rebuilding of the staffing after Covid (whole other story), and not disturbing that until conversions start right after summer ‘23. As further evidence, the brand new 321-NEO’s have been heavily put on BOS routes for a reason… It is so much more than just a desired outcome.There is a ton of revenue there, and the widget is going after it. BOS will happen, barring some new, unforeseen black swan like WWIII. And as someone said, even if you have to drive to NYC for a short time, it will be worth it. Over a career, bases can and do shift, but I absolutely would not go to AA as a hedge for a BOS base at DL. Just my 2cents. Good luck. |
I don’t know the timeline to fix the mess, but Delta passengers transitioning between our domestic and international gates in BOS know it’s awful. HVC neighbor friend recently making the connection there says he’ll never book that itinerary ever again.
So, they can only do so much in the current configuration and if they want to open a base there now, my hunch is it’ll be pretty persistent and unlikely to close once the operation is eventually smoothed out. |
Originally Posted by UtahGetMe2
(Post 3507428)
I have CJO's with AA and DL, and my main goal is to be BOS-based. I know no one has a crystal ball, but can anyone attempt to quantify their confidence in DL opening BOS this summer-ish?
For example, I've read that there's construction at Terminal A, that they've ID'd staff and the Chief Pilot, etc. Are there any other clues or indications? I would like to go with DL, but unless DL makes BOS 'official,' I'd feel compelled to go with AA. The thought of telling DL 'TBNT' potentially only mere months from them announcing BOS is a bit nauseating. Thanks in advance to anyone who's got some info/advice. At this point, baring any near term black swans, I'd say it's fairly likely. There seems to be lots of people champing at the bit for that base to open. Either way, that username is awesome! I have a shirt with that on it. :D Goodluck with your decision. |
Originally Posted by nene
(Post 3507140)
Yes indeed, this reeks of "free beer tomorrow sign"
If/when JB decides that operating international from BOS and JFK won't work, then a BOS base will go back on a back burner faster than last weeks dinner. A plethora of events could happen between now and the end of next summer (many of which haven't even been thought of yet) that could/would change this declaration. There is and has been far more flying than needed to justify a base there for a while now. The problem has been too many redundant fleet types force multiplied by marketing's absolute dominance over flight ops. Every flight operated in or out of BOS has to be from a different equipment or different bases. That dilutes it so severely that bases easily as big as JB's bases there become radically less efficient. But despite all that, its finally getting to critical mass where it justifies it despite the overlapping inefficiencies of a million BES's. JB cleaned DL's clock in BOS for a long time. We gave them an entire terminal by building the billion dolalr Taj Mullin and abandoning the old one. That's the real reason JB initially pulled their red eye trans cons out of ATL; it was never DL and AirTran's subcontracted fre wars. It was JB seeing an opportunity to pounce and absolutely dominate one of the best domestic markets in the world while their competitors were collapsing on the Chapter 11 courthouse steps. IMO DL's actual presence in BOS is far more important than any small ball hotel cost saving crew base. That said, it seems very likely it will be a crew base for pilots. |
Anything new going on with opening a BOS base?
|
Originally Posted by Rcordeiro122592
(Post 3555555)
Anything new going on with opening a BOS base?
|
Originally Posted by MJP27
(Post 3555581)
No. filler
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:34 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands