Originally Posted by vyperdriver
(Post 3013063)
Somewhere else I read 488 pilots with COVID-19, anybody else hear that?
And even considering a conservative fatality rate of 0.5%, that means 73 delta pilots will end up in coffins because of COVID. |
Originally Posted by popcopy
(Post 3013070)
Maybe!! Seems kinda low
And even considering a conservative fatality rate of 0.5%, that means 73 delta pilots will end up in coffins because of COVID. |
I guess my question will be, in the end, what did delta gain by risking the lives of the aircrew and other personnel by not shutting down operations in NYC. What's the response from the leadership to the spouse and family of a dead pilot (or anyone) from a low risk state, that catches corona in NYC, and dies or kills a family member because they bring it home. If but not for the night after night layover or bus ride in and out of the airport said person would be not likely to catch anyth hing. Operations that fly into and leave NYC maybe, but layovers and daily commuters should be kept to a minimum as an idea to minimize exposure.
|
I would like a real count from the company.
How many pilots? How many FAs? I think we deserve to know. It’s a data point in risk assessment. |
Originally Posted by Banzai
(Post 3013097)
I would like a real count from the company.
How many pilots? How many FAs? I think we deserve to know. It’s a data point in risk assessment. It's a reasonable request. |
Originally Posted by Phins2right
(Post 3013105)
#metoo
It's a reasonable request. |
I think it's interesting we stop flights to Beijing and Shanghai (pretty far from Wuhan), yet we still fly into NYC which is an insane hot zone currently.
|
Originally Posted by popcopy
(Post 3013060)
“It’s not worse than the flu, it’s the dems trying to take down trump”
- My last captain |
Originally Posted by vyperdriver
(Post 3013093)
I guess my question will be, in the end, what did delta gain by risking the lives of the aircrew and other personnel by not shutting down operations in NYC. What's the response from the leadership to the spouse and family of a dead pilot (or anyone) from a low risk state, that catches corona in NYC, and dies or kills a family member because they bring it home. If but not for the night after night layover or bus ride in and out of the airport said person would be not likely to catch anyth hing. Operations that fly into and leave NYC maybe, but layovers and daily commuters should be kept to a minimum as an idea to minimize exposure.
|
Originally Posted by popcopy
(Post 3013134)
NYC is in vogue right now cause they’re the poster covid child with 30,000 infected. — Give that 1-2 weeks. LAX, SFO, ATL, MSP, DTW, SEA, SLC, and CVG will all have robust infectious numbers in excess of 30k.
|
Originally Posted by Turbo1
(Post 3013135)
I will bet against that, you're a drama queen with no basis in fact
|
Originally Posted by Turbo1
(Post 3013135)
I will bet against that, you're a drama queen with no basis in fact
|
Originally Posted by Turbo1
(Post 3013135)
I will bet against that, you're a drama queen with no basis in fact
|
Coronavirus could kill 81,000 in U.S., subside in June - Washington University analysis https://reut.rs/2UlKvWz
This analysis predicts up to 162K deaths. Nothing to sneeze at, but hardly into the millions as many on this forum have repeated. And that’s their worst-case scenario. I think Corona might end up being the Mad Dog virus. Starts strong, but once you turn on the anti-ice it’s pretty much done. |
From the coronavirus document for pilots on the flight ops page:
Why working crews are exempt from certain self-quarantines: ... We also have to treat nonrevs like the general population, which across a broad population lowers the risk. So doesn't that mean commuters non-revving from NY to FL are directed by an official government capacity to quarantine? Doesn't the exception only apply to WORKING crew, not leisure travel, which non-revving is? |
Originally Posted by queuetip
(Post 3013577)
From the coronavirus document for pilots on the flight ops page:
Why working crews are exempt from certain self-quarantines: ... We also have to treat nonrevs like the general population, which across a broad population lowers the risk. So doesn't that mean commuters non-revving from NY to FL are directed by an official government capacity to quarantine? Doesn't the exception only apply to WORKING crew, not leisure travel, which non-revving is? |
How fast have the company test results been coming back?
Thinking about getting tested at the front end of a 4 day trip but I don’t want to get stuck somewhere if it comes back positive. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Ground Effect
(Post 3102545)
How fast have the company test results been coming back?
Thinking about getting tested at the front end of a 4 day trip but I don’t want to get stuck somewhere if it comes back positive. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Ground Effect
(Post 3102545)
How fast have the company test results been coming back?
Thinking about getting tested at the front end of a 4 day trip but I don’t want to get stuck somewhere if it comes back positive. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Great thank you!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Funk
(Post 3102551)
Speaking of the portal, if you don’t check it during your trip, you won’t know the results.
My advice would be for them to pick a time of testing where they won't be working while awaiting results. |
Originally Posted by clear4approach
(Post 3102570)
I want to get tested to see if I have the virus, but don't want to get stuck quarantining away from home if I do. I should simply not seek out the results and continue to fly with a fellow pilot(s) until it's convenient for me to get the result.
My advice would be for them to pick a time of testing where they won't be working while awaiting results. What’s the difference? I don’t have any symptoms I’m only taking it because the company wants us all to take it. If I scheduled for a later date that’d be no different from not looking at the results right away. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Ground Effect
(Post 3102545)
How fast have the company test results been coming back?
Thinking about getting tested at the front end of a 4 day trip but I don’t want to get stuck somewhere if it comes back positive. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk And you’re going to work anyway? |
Originally Posted by clear4approach
(Post 3102570)
I want to get tested to see if I have the virus, but don't want to get stuck quarantining away from home if I do. I should simply not seek out the results and continue to fly with a fellow pilot(s) until it's convenient for me to get the result.
My advice would be for them to pick a time of testing where they won't be working while awaiting results. |
Originally Posted by Ground Effect
(Post 3102545)
How fast have the company test results been coming back?
Thinking about getting tested at the front end of a 4 day trip but I don’t want to get stuck somewhere if it comes back positive. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Banzai
(Post 3102585)
Do you reasonably believe that you might be sick, and have a likelihood of being stuck out?
And you’re going to work anyway? I don’t have any symptoms. I’m testing because the company asked all employees to get tested for a baseline. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Took me 48 hours for both test results in LAX. I did it after finishing a trip.
|
I did mine in MSP the first week. Got both results back from Mayo the next day. One came in overnight (less than 24 hrs) and the other just before COB (about 30 hours). This was, however, several weeks ago, early on in the program, and MN wasn't having the delays that they are today. YMMV
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:42 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands