Too Lower ALV or Not?

Subscribe
2  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16 
Page 12 of 16
Go to
Quote: They have a lengthy track record of deception, misleading us, and using every financial trick in the book to get around numerous previous agreements. If they want to draw on the goodwill of the pilot group they first have to establish some goodwill.
Scoop
This is pretty much the gospel....according to Scoop....and he pretty much dead on nutz nails it. NO gives. Dust needs to settle. Let's see where we are at around end of Sept.
Thanks for the post Scoop.
Reply
Quote: So much wrong with this fatalistic statement.

Go figure, I disagree.

That is only true in today's almost zero revenue environment. Either that changes or we have not only no airline, but no airline industry and no economy. There is no amount of salary you can save between now and then that will prepare you for that. If you're not already prepared to functionally retire or seamlessly switch careers, its over for your financial situation regardless of ALV for the rest of the year. If you need that to make it, you won't make it either way.

Soooooo you actually agree with his statement..... Agreed with the rest too.

Revenue will increase from today's levels. Probably by a lot. But the zone of "a lot" is still very large since present levels are so low. Therefore it buys us time as an airline and as a seniority list. Days of liquidity per amount saved at today's revenue is irrelevant as that figure increases exponentially at even partially recovered revenue levels which we will certainly see.

If revenue increases then our problems are mostly solved. This is the one part of the equation we don't have any information on.......only the Company does and they wouldn't lie to us.......would they? Until we have a better picture of the revenue side of things, I am not in favor of ALV reductions. If the revenue doesn't come back an ALV reduction is insignificant. Instead lets go with the SIL's and early retirements right NOW and see what revenue does in a month or two. I'm laying odds that the "stay at home" direction from the Feds and State's is going to continue thru the end of May. IMO we will not see an increase in revenue before July or August. You say revenue will come back and it surely will...........but when is that and will it be soon enough to make a difference?

As for the voluntary programs, its doesn't have to be either/or. In fact, I think it must be both. If leadership would rather liquidate instead of take a chance at having a unionized FA group like the rest of the industry then there isn't anything we can (or should) do. But if they finally decide to take this situation seriously and start showing the "executive talent" everyone (including most pilots have been lauding them with, year round but especially every February) then we will most likely not only survive but lead the industry in the recovery.

If the company gets a 20% ALV reduction, SILs just became extinct. There is no reason to offer them. Do you really have that much faith in our "Executive Talent?" I do not.

Full ALV til the last day because nothing we do matters is unrealistic and a very poor strategy. So are straw man arguments that confuse lower ALV's for lower work obligation with pre-BK pay rate cuts, do it once do it right and bankruptcy protection letters. Completely different things. No judge will ever impose lower ALV's and management will demand higher ALV's along with deep pay cuts and all the rest. If it gets to that point its far more likely upper limits on ALV will be scrapped, which we all seemed to understand was the real concession up until a couple months ago.
What you don't seem to be getting is most of us are NOT saying "full pay to the last day." We are advocating a more slow and considered approach to the current problem. Some kind of relief may eventually be necessary but the problem needs to be analyzed right now and not pulling a Nancy Pelosi and saying we need to pass it so we can find out what's in it. The company needs to share future revenue projections with us. Not sure I see this happening.....

Denny
Reply
Quote: What you don't seem to be getting is most of us are NOT saying "full pay to the last day." We are advocating a more slow and considered approach to the current problem. Some kind of relief may eventually be necessary but the problem needs to be analyzed right now and not pulling a Nancy Pelosi and saying we need to pass it so we can find out what's in it. The company needs to share future revenue projections with us. Not sure I see this happening.....

Denny
They shared through the end of the year in the last town hall meeting. Don’t remember exactly but 30% 3Q an 50% 4Q sticks in my mind.
Reply
Quote: They shared through the end of the year in the last town hall meeting. Don’t remember exactly but 30% 3Q an 50% 4Q sticks in my mind.

The true picture won't be painted until a month or two from now with future bookings


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Quote: I've been through the past bankruptcy. My biggest concern besides the whole company tanking (we can't prevent it with pay cuts if it's going to happen), is cheapening our profession. We did irreparable damage to our profession after 2001. "I'll fly for free, I love flying" guys did a lot of damage. ALPA should have come out a lot harder against what happened. Most of those guys ended up as consultants. Management laughed at us until TA2. I'd rather make a stand now and go back to an industry where pilots are respected. Or just do something else altogether. You don't see doctors or lawyers cutting their rates right now.
Uh, can't speak for lawyers, but my wife is an MD. Doctors have been getting reamed for years. Medicare and Medicaid paperwork and reimbursements get worse every year. It's to the point that several of her colleagues with independent practices don't take those two programs at all. Look up OB liability rates. It's a miracle there are OBs at all.

Oh yes, doctors have had their "profession" cheapened for decades. Sorry that interferes with the narrative you are peddling. I flew an A321 the other day from BOS-DTW. 12 passengers. You talk about "taking a stand." Against what? It is true we have a revenue crisis.... but therefore we have a balance sheet crisis.

I'm not advocating anything other than what our MEC recommends, including no reduction in the ALV for now, since the company played their shenanigans post LOA 20-01. (I think the C16 update was an exceptional summary). But false bravado will do just as little as the company's bizarre obsession with "optics" and a non union FA group.
Reply
I am not willing to take a paycut in my last few years to save the job of a guy with 20-30 left...sorry..I have had enough punches to the face in my 30 years...the junior guys can take one now.. After the dust clears they will have great careers. With amazing advancement opportunities.

Got my asbestos suit on. so flame away.

Spanker
Reply
Quote: What you don't seem to be getting is most of us are NOT saying "full pay to the last day." We are advocating a more slow and considered approach to the current problem. Some kind of relief may eventually be necessary but the problem needs to be analyzed right now and not pulling a Nancy Pelosi and saying we need to pass it so we can find out what's in it. The company needs to share future revenue projections with us. Not sure I see this happening.....
What revenue projections? There are none right now, other than random guesses. The only thing we know is they will be WAY lower for quite a while. You think they are bluffing? We're about to "V-shape recover" like it wasn't no thang?

You disagree with me saying that POV (of "nothing we do will provide more than a couple days of liquidity) is fatalistic nonsense? That BS fuzzy math only applies in today's near zero revenue environment. I did say revenue woud come back dramatically, but then said even double, triple or quadrouple revenue gains would still be a small fraction of previous revenue. We are bleeding cash fast and the only payoff for "winding the clock" (until 10-01-2020 apparently) is the ALV between now and then.

ALV reductions in a returning revenue environment, but one that is WAY woer than before, will buy us much more time than the insane out of context barvado nonsense of "only 3-4 days remaining" being used now.

Massive revenue gains are coming. Absolutely massive percentage gains over today. Earth shattering percentage gains. The stuff of legend (if viewed out of context in a vacuum). Revenue gains the likes of which this industry has never seen before during the best of times. And they won't be anywhere near enough to not only avoid furloughs, but for the company to remain in existance, unless the industry returns to close to where it was very, very quickly or someone else goes away first. We need every day of time remaining we can get instead of playing paycheck to paycheck smallball. I agree that we need to do SIL's and early outs, otherwise our leadership has no plan and there's nothing we can do.

But one pilot one vote. See you on the other side with the AVL savings or at the long lines at the job fares as everyone else says "thanks DL guys for taking one for the profession." The occasional free beer will more than make up for the eradication of our seniority list. I am financially prepared for any ALV reduction as well as full ALV til the last day and doing resumes and buying a new suit and starting over at year one step one somewhere else. But that's a really dumb gamble to take to bank 20 hours a month til this is sorted out.

But my MEC speaks for me, even if I disagree. We want to roll the dice so let's roll them.
Reply
Quote: I am not willing to take a paycut in my last few years to save the job of a guy with 20-30 left...sorry..I have had enough punches to the face in my 30 years...the junior guys can take one now.. After the dust clears they will have great careers. With amazing advancement opportunities.

Got my asbestos suit on. so flame away.

Spanker
That is a completely fair position. What about pilots with 15 years left? I haven't looked at your post history, but it would be logical to assume that you are against the "plus up" component of the MBCBP as well. Every pilot is responsible for their own retirement and has an obligation to play the hand they are dealt.

Early retirement, SILs, MLOA and partial or full month KLOAs are individual options that could mitigate furloughs without imposing lower ALV on everyone. There are plenty of options DAPLA has made available to Delta. We can make a collective decision offering lower ALVs after the bailout, but ultimately Delta decides what size of pilot group makes sense for the airline. That decision will be heavily influenced by projections on air travel recovery relative to training capacity. If the company can train at a pace matching travel recovery, expect furloughs in lieu of reduced ALV. If the company expects a recovery in demand faster than they can train, expect lower ALV as an accumulator of pilots ready for growth.

A decade or two from now, we will have pilots whining they couldn't prepare for retirement because of Wuhan Virus. Anyone who resembles that remark, please take action now, so you don't feel compelled to whine. Learn from the DZers and take action now. Cutting expenses or selling a few toys and investing that money takes discipline and emotional maturity, but you will thank yourself at 65.
Reply
Quote: What revenue projections? There are none right now, other than random guesses. The only thing we know is they will be WAY lower for quite a while. You think they are bluffing? We're about to "V-shape recover" like it wasn't no thang?

You disagree with me saying that POV (of "nothing we do will provide more than a couple days of liquidity) is fatalistic nonsense? That BS fuzzy math only applies in today's near zero revenue environment. I did say revenue woud come back dramatically, but then said even double, triple or quadrouple revenue gains would still be a small fraction of previous revenue. We are bleeding cash fast and the only payoff for "winding the clock" (until 10-01-2020 apparently) is the ALV between now and then.

ALV reductions in a returning revenue environment, but one that is WAY woer than before, will buy us much more time than the insane out of context barvado nonsense of "only 3-4 days remaining" being used now.

Massive revenue gains are coming. Absolutely massive percentage gains over today. Earth shattering percentage gains. The stuff of legend (if viewed out of context in a vacuum). Revenue gains the likes of which this industry has never seen before during the best of times. And they won't be anywhere near enough to not only avoid furloughs, but for the company to remain in existance, unless the industry returns to close to where it was very, very quickly or someone else goes away first. We need every day of time remaining we can get instead of playing paycheck to paycheck smallball. I agree that we need to do SIL's and early outs, otherwise our leadership has no plan and there's nothing we can do.

But one pilot one vote. See you on the other side with the AVL savings or at the long lines at the job fares as everyone else says "thanks DL guys for taking one for the profession." The occasional free beer will more than make up for the eradication of our seniority list. I am financially prepared for any ALV reduction as well as full ALV til the last day and doing resumes and buying a new suit and starting over at year one step one somewhere else. But that's a really dumb gamble to take to bank 20 hours a month til this is sorted out.

But my MEC speaks for me, even if I disagree. We want to roll the dice so let's roll them.
Rolling the dice is a gamble it assumes a chance at winning. That is a very poor analogy. Management is doing its calculations and their decision is the gamble. We have no ability to control the course of the business. If bankruptcy is the best case scenario in their minds there is absolutely nothing you can do. The same for their use of SILs and wether or not they offer early outs. Your push is way too premature and I would only consider it if a judge was presiding over the new “agreement.”
Reply
Quote: Rolling the dice is a gamble it assumes a chance at winning. That is a very poor analogy. Management is doing its calculations and their decision is the gamble. We have no ability to control the course of the business. If bankruptcy is the best case scenario in their minds there is absolutely nothing you can do. The same for their use of SILs and wether or not they offer early outs. Your push is way too premature and I would only consider it if a judge was presiding over the new “agreement.”
No judge (if it gets to that point) is going to impose lower ALV's. If we are in BK the company will not only not ask for lower ALV's they will want to eliminate the upper limit on ALV's entirely. Fly to the FAR's and let the ALV rise as much as possible. How quickly we forget that higher ALV's are a QOL concession. The fairly recent +1 hour increase was considered a significant concession. Now all the sudden high ALV's are pro pilot.

The best stratedgy is to avoid not just Ch 11 but Ch 7, both of which are possibilities, while positioning the airline to be the one that is most capabile of qickly recovering on the other side of this. We are hemmoraging cash and saving cash means buying time.This could easily come down to days or weeks remaining to either trigger making the difference.

That said, the company has not shown an adequate plan with their SIL shenanigans as well as putting early outs on the back burner while our competition smokes us with both. Every day of time we save could easily make the difference. We don't have to outrun the bear, we only have to run faster than the slowest competitor. Right now we're barely walking away while everyone else is at least jogging because leadership is more scared of a unionized FA group (which all our competitors have already) than they are the biggest crisis the industry has every seen. As long as that remains the case, full ALV til the last day then because they clearly don't have an adequate plan.
Reply
2  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16 
Page 12 of 16
Go to