ALV decrease email out.
07-17-2020 | 06:03 AM
#2
Banned
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
From: Gummed
So when we shoot it down management can in good faith say "See, we offered it to them, a way out of furloughs, but they didn't agree". All part of their master plan. Can't have the FAs organizing.
07-17-2020 | 06:03 AM
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,880
Likes: 136
If they are saying 1 yr furloughs protection vs 2 yrs (previous letter), for me, it means that the VEOP might save enough UNA pilots for next year.
It seems they want to lower the WB ALV while keeping the narrow bodies working harder.
It seems they want to lower the WB ALV while keeping the narrow bodies working harder.
07-17-2020 | 06:05 AM
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,584
Likes: 239
From: UNA
By my math that’s ~61 hours. I say we follow jebtlue’s example and only consider an ALV reduction as long as it does not lower line gaurentee (65). if we reduce RES gaurentee (not lower than 65) it should come with 2 more days off.
edit: how will unwinding the MOAD work for 9 closing categories? Will they keep the closed ER and 717? Will they not close CVG?
07-17-2020 | 06:15 AM
#8
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: B73N
“It also assigns a category to pilots who were previously assigned UNA.”
Would this be your previous category or a new bid with a seat lock?
Overall I think this is not a bad deal. The world is shutting back down and a secure job for a year is huge.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Would this be your previous category or a new bid with a seat lock?
Overall I think this is not a bad deal. The world is shutting back down and a secure job for a year is huge.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
07-17-2020 | 06:18 AM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,880
Likes: 136
I think is fair, but whatever...it needs to come down to Memrat and see if it passes. But we need to adress scope first.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
