Whistle blower Karlean Pettit
#131
New Hire
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Position: 717b
Posts: 6
They told you not to wear them because there was a nationwide shortage and people with "common sense" like you were hoarding them while doctors couldn't get enough.
#132
Keep in mind that you are on a Delta thread and that they are a unionized pilot group. In the airline world there is never a valid excuse to wind up on a scab list. Those who end up on a list typically spend the rest of their careers ostracized and somehow overlooked for positions that are not purely seniority driven. To put it another way, airline pilots look at scabs like Christians look at Judas.
After the EAL strike in 89 DAL only hired EAL SCABs and by most they were welcomed as ‘brothers’. One PAA SCAB ended up at DAL and dang if he didn’t end up in the union at DAL ... even ended up pictured in the ALPA magazine.
Some things amaze me.
Last edited by Huell; 12-31-2020 at 02:40 AM. Reason: Clarification as to who’s SCAB
#133
and where exactly was ALPA when said pilot had to go to DPA for assistance because ALPA tossed her on the trash heap? A non ALPA, DPA lawyer had to intervene and won. Now ALPA crawls out from under its rock to cheerlead the decision as though they were there the whole time...its time for a new union gang.
#134
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,110
It was a request but who does that? Just one strange action in a host of others that led the company to wonder if she was “all there”. Her safety report alone was not the reason for all this and in a vacuum would never have resulted in what ended up happening.
#135
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Position: Representing the REAL Delta
Posts: 857
1st CA is probably from:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.the...air-force-base
2nd from:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ind...111.html%3famp
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.the...air-force-base
2nd from:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ind...111.html%3famp
#136
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,990
#137
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,419
IDK what his motives were but to me I think he was pointing out why people might be obsessive about something. I don’t think he was bashing those pilots, but rather show why someone might be overly cautious.
#138
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,990
and where exactly was ALPA when said pilot had to go to DPA for assistance because ALPA tossed her on the trash heap? A non ALPA, DPA lawyer had to intervene and won. Now ALPA crawls out from under its rock to cheerlead the decision as though they were there the whole time...its time for a new union gang.
Even if emotionally involved, there is no need for drama. Integrity First my friend.
The DPA seeks to undermine and decertify the Air Line Pilots Association on the Delta property. The DPA never got enough cards to get a vote and never represented a Delta pilot.
Last edited by Bucking Bar; 12-31-2020 at 09:50 AM.
#139
New Hire
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Position: 717b
Posts: 6
She was found to have a disqualifying condition by one Doctor. Went through the process prescribed by our Pilot Working Agreement and got her job back as a result of that process. In summation, our ALPA negotiated PWA saved her job.
Even if emotionally involved, there is no need for drama. Integrity First my friend.
The DPA seeks to undermine and decertify the Air Line Pilots Association on the Delta property. The DPA never got enough cards to get a vote and never represented a Delta pilot.
Even if emotionally involved, there is no need for drama. Integrity First my friend.
The DPA seeks to undermine and decertify the Air Line Pilots Association on the Delta property. The DPA never got enough cards to get a vote and never represented a Delta pilot.
"Dr. Altman commented that Complainant and her husband at one point had three children under three while Complainant attended night school earning a 3.7 GPA, and she worked at her husband's business. Dr. Altman then said 'I don't know any woman who could do that. I don't know any woman with three under three that isn't exhausted, let alone going to school."
This was used as part of his basis to medically disqualify her and ruin her career. Fortunately the tribunal saw through this idiotic and sexist bull****, saying:
"The Tribunal was struck by DU. Altman's comment about how Complainant's ability to have a career and raise small children was suggestive of mania. Dr. Altman appeared to confuse an industrious mother (not an uncommon trait in modern society) with a manic one. Also Complainant's children are grown adults. It is unclear how complainant's ability to raise in the distant past "three under three" related to her present mental wellbeing or fitness to fly."
This is incredibly embarrassing for Delta. She may or may not have violated the social media policy, I don't know or care. Delta's reaction in hiring a quack doctor to perform a punitive section 15 is beyond the pale. She deserves every penny of the 500K