June Crew Resources Update
06-11-2021, 11:57 AM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: Standing by for MOAD downgrade...
Posts: 117
There is a hyperlink in the email…it just looks exactly the same as the rest of the text. I just randomly click on the words “Crew Resources Update” on the email and eventually it opens up…
06-11-2021, 12:28 PM
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Position: 757/767
Posts: 389
Sounds like a July FO AE to spread newhire positions onto more narrowbody fleets (read: reduce the burden on the ER training pipeline). They'll need a lot of positions to support the hiring numbers they're looking at going forward. Once they build up an FO surplus, there'll be a Q4 AE that has narrowbody captain positions. That AE might see some very junior captains.
06-11-2021, 01:38 PM
#5
New Hire
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Position: Concourse A
Posts: 780
Originally Posted by 172skychicken
Sounds like a July FO AE to spread newhire positions onto more narrowbody fleets (read: reduce the burden on the ER training pipeline). They'll need a lot of positions to support the hiring numbers they're looking at going forward. Once they build up an FO surplus, there'll be a Q4 AE that has narrowbody captain positions. That AE might see some very junior captains.
why very junior? Talking about lack of NB qol?
06-11-2021, 02:58 PM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Position: 757/767
Posts: 389
Originally Posted by Scooter432
why very junior? Talking about lack of NB qol?
06-11-2021, 03:09 PM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,417
Logistical question about bidding AEs, how does the % qualifier deal with unbid positions?
EG on the April AE: NYC7ER had 188 unbid positions after the award was processed. If all those positions were filled by new hires the category will have about 400 pilots total. if someone at the bottom of the list had bid NYC7ER at 70% or less would they have gotten it(~220 out of 400)? Or would the computer only see current pilots and passed them (220 out of 220)
EG on the April AE: NYC7ER had 188 unbid positions after the award was processed. If all those positions were filled by new hires the category will have about 400 pilots total. if someone at the bottom of the list had bid NYC7ER at 70% or less would they have gotten it(~220 out of 400)? Or would the computer only see current pilots and passed them (220 out of 220)
Last edited by Gone Flying; 06-11-2021 at 03:39 PM.
06-11-2021, 03:53 PM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: The Parlor
Posts: 1,243
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
Logistical question about bidding AEs, how does the % qualifier deal with unbid positions?
EG on the April AE: NYC7ER had 188 unbid positions after the award was processed. If all those positions were filled by new hires the category will have about 400 pilots total. if someone at the bottom of the list had bid NYC7ER at 70% or less would they have gotten it(~220 out of 400)? Or would the computer only see current pilots and passed them (220 out of 220)
EG on the April AE: NYC7ER had 188 unbid positions after the award was processed. If all those positions were filled by new hires the category will have about 400 pilots total. if someone at the bottom of the list had bid NYC7ER at 70% or less would they have gotten it(~220 out of 400)? Or would the computer only see current pilots and passed them (220 out of 220)
06-11-2021, 07:12 PM
#10
Has a furrowed brow
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,160
Originally Posted by 172skychicken
I figure between all the new captains as well as people who slid into widebody FO spots on the April AE, that a Q4 captain bid could have some pretty junior captains, maybe even some who aren't on property yet.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
