Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2 >

Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-2025 | 11:16 AM
  #10081  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,821
Likes: 153
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by Verdell
Auto-accept is A problem, but it's not OUR problem, and it is a big problem for the company. I.E. it's leverage (for us.) I'm pretty sure that's what Hockey was saying here.
Agreed. I’m 100% in favor of fully monetizing that in our favor. I could (couldn’t?) care less about the little keyboard empire “good deal” scammers who auto accept every trip in the system with no intention to ever do, then act victimized when the chaos of the moment passes them up for something they never would have done anyway.

No one is advocating to just give that back for free. It’s a massive cost item. IMO we should harvest that cost for the benefit of the entire group. If we don’t, we will have to carry that cost on our side of the ledger for the entire pilot group so a tiny number of us can get paid for nothing on a technicality.

We shouldn’t give it away for free. We should all benefit from selling it.
Reply
Old 10-18-2025 | 01:21 PM
  #10082  
HelloNewnan's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 290
Likes: 71
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Agreed. I’m 100% in favor of fully monetizing that in our favor. I could (couldn’t?) care less about the little keyboard empire “good deal” scammers who auto accept every trip in the system with no intention to ever do, then act victimized when the chaos of the moment passes them up for something they never would have done anyway.

No one is advocating to just give that back for free. It’s a massive cost item. IMO we should harvest that cost for the benefit of the entire group. If we don’t, we will have to carry that cost on our side of the ledger for the entire pilot group so a tiny number of us can get paid for nothing on a technicality.

We shouldn’t give it away for free. We should all benefit from selling it.
Holy cow. You said the quiet part out loud.

Be prepared for getting lashed with a wet noodle for incorrect thinking.
Reply
Old 10-18-2025 | 01:22 PM
  #10083  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,099
Likes: 1,047
Default

Originally Posted by HelloNewnan
Holy cow. You said the quiet part out loud.

Be prepared to go to APC jail for incorrect thinking.
I think for the masses, that was the rub wrt batch sizes. It wasn’t that we gave that back, it’s that we got absolutely nothing of value for it. We traded a bitcoin for a literal shiny penny.
Reply
Old 10-18-2025 | 01:39 PM
  #10084  
crewdawg's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,342
Likes: 347
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
I think for the masses, that was the rub wrt batch sizes. It wasn’t that we gave that back, it’s that we got absolutely nothing of value for it. We traded a bitcoin for a literal shiny penny.

Yup and many got lashed for saying that at the time.
Reply
Old 10-18-2025 | 01:51 PM
  #10085  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,183
Likes: 638
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Originally Posted by Meme In Command
Wouldn't a solution be strict time hacks to specific rungs of the coverage ladder?

Trip in open time between X and Y hours away from sign in must be assigned to the next LC res in line. That LC pilot MUST be notified AT the 18hr mark

Trip in OT between Y and no later than 3 hours from sign in must be assigned to a SC.

Trip that pops up on OT within 3 hrs from signing in MUST ran as a GS

Trip that is within less than 1 hr and meets XYZ parameters can be assigned to a pilot as a reroute.

Idk, just examples of what I means, don't take that ^ as gospel. Just saying, right now CS just runs stuff so randomly and it makes no sense to any of us. Strict time hacks would clear up a lot of confusion, offer the pilot group more transparency into how trip coverage is going (because we'd have a clear timeline of what should happen when) and we essentially could be handing the company the exact formula of how to automate the system in a way that benefits us in some manner.

I wholeheartedly disagree with the "it's their problem to fix, not mine. Figure it out". In theory, yes. In reality it's just opening the door for them to fix the problem in a way we may not like and we're gonna hear a lot of "we didn't think they'd do that"

I'm just spitballing, whatever it is, we need to be involved
We can agree to any set of rules we decide. We have 2 time frame ladders now. The ladders themselves are rules. Enforcing any of the rules is where the rubber meets the road. Changing from one set of rules to another only complicates things and erases precedent. COMPLIANCE is the issue not the rules.

So many of us just want GSs to be handled like they were. If you got a call it was yours. Auto-accept does that. I do a blanket green slip and always have. The company wanted automation and the deal included auto accept. Let's all just take a step back and see what the company's proposal is to fix their problem. None of this would be an issue if they had adequate automation designed around their needs instead of Icrew and an emergency lineman call out app. (yes, literally electric and phone lines down due to a natural disaster and a rotating call out app ARCOS was used to keep from pulling the same linemen regularly) The combination of an old scheduling system and a band aided app and call system from NOT the airline industry are not working harmoniously together. How is this an issue for ALPA at all? Deal makers have been around as long as I've been here an probably longer. That is an internal pro stans issue and will never go away. SS are an issue because they were not well thought out and diminish GS value for RES and GS opportunity for all (RES and REG) If there is no auto accept people will find a way to screen their GSs and the system will not improve... unless and until the COMPANY invests in a fix that is acceptable and compliant.

Last edited by notEnuf; 10-18-2025 at 02:12 PM.
Reply
Old 10-18-2025 | 01:56 PM
  #10086  
Line Holder
Liked
20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 120
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Yes. We need 23M7 enforcement and transparency not another deal that takes away our tools for proffers.
FIxing 23M7 is NOT THE ANSWER. Fixing the trip coverage process is. Trip coverage worked fine for 97 years of our history. We need to focus on how to get back to that, not fixing the process that allows the company to completely disregard it.

Focusing on the penalty is acknowledging and normalizing the presently broken trip coverage process. This is what ALPA needs to figure out with the company.
Reply
Old 10-18-2025 | 02:36 PM
  #10087  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,183
Likes: 638
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Originally Posted by marcal
FIxing 23M7 is NOT THE ANSWER. Fixing the trip coverage process is. Trip coverage worked fine for 97 years of our history. We need to focus on how to get back to that, not fixing the process that allows the company to completely disregard it.

Focusing on the penalty is acknowledging and normalizing the presently broken trip coverage process. This is what ALPA needs to figure out with the company.
I'm all ears if you can find a solution but this is brought on by choices the company is making like batch sizes, how/when to run coverage, and skipping steps. That is NOT our problem to fix. IMHO And even if we do agree to a fix we are setting a precedent of accommodation. That surely won't back fire when we are presented with the next "problem." They need to own the consequences of their decisions.
Reply
Old 10-18-2025 | 02:39 PM
  #10088  
HelloNewnan's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 290
Likes: 71
Default

Originally Posted by marcal
FIxing 23M7 is NOT THE ANSWER. Fixing the trip coverage process is. Trip coverage worked fine for 97 years of our history. We need to focus on how to get back to that, not fixing the process that allows the company to completely disregard it.

Focusing on the penalty is acknowledging and normalizing the presently broken trip coverage process. This is what ALPA needs to figure out with the company.
So we've got votes to fix 23M7, and we've got votes to fix trip coverage. But to pull the truck out, you have to back the tractor even further back into the ditch.

The question people should be asking is why is there so much open time. If there was just a regular amount of open time, none of the rest of the stuff matters.
Reply
Old 10-18-2025 | 04:16 PM
  #10089  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 48
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by HelloNewnan
So we've got votes to fix 23M7, and we've got votes to fix trip coverage. But to pull the truck out, you have to back the tractor even further back into the ditch.

The question people should be asking is why is there so much open time. If there was just a regular amount of open time, none of the rest of the stuff matters.
It’s almost as if it’s normally slow this time of year, and yet here we are with GSs going out daily and scheduling running afoul of the coverage award ladder just to desperately cover flying… It’s almost as if we need more pilots.
Reply
Old 10-18-2025 | 04:40 PM
  #10090  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,545
Likes: 285
Default

Originally Posted by Ryler
It’s almost as if it’s normally slow this time of year, and yet here we are with GSs going out daily and scheduling running afoul of the coverage award ladder just to desperately cover flying… It’s almost as if we need more pilots.
I enjoy the premium flying. Fly 70 hours of credit, then easy 2 leg 2 day GS for 90 plus hours. That’s my monthly formula especially in the slow months.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boog123
Delta
6
07-14-2016 11:26 AM
iahflyr
Major
27
09-30-2014 09:04 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices