Contract Expectations
#251
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
This is such a tired rant. There's no way the company (or any RLA governed company) will agree to a timely deal unless its undervalued. And yes we have tried, and it failed miserably. The company will always seek to exploit the timeline through the RLA process during good times and rush to exploit bad times. If you've been around the industry for an economic cycle or two then you know. Or, you can shill for the man. Why doesn't it surprise me that the username that starts this thread eventually makes these statements?


We lost this battle. You may think differently and that’s ok. One of us is wrong and will be surprised by the outcome. If it ends up being you, I hope you will reconsider the argument for small raises over short duration in the future. But, if you do, don’t be surprised again when someone says that won’t work because we need to “made whole
” for past failures.
#252
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
I have been at this airline since before contract 2000. We have never negotiated for an inflationary raise plus a small real raise, short duration. We have always been in the mode of fighting for past years and failures. You know “restoring the profession” and all of that. So you’re simply wrong if you think this has been tried. We always try to fight for lost battles and it shows. We’re not alone. The rest of the industry has done even more poorly than we have.
We lost this battle. You may think differently and that’s ok. One of us is wrong and will be surprised by the outcome. If it ends up being you, I hope you will reconsider the argument for small raises over short duration in the future. But, if you do, don’t be surprised again when someone says that won’t work because we need to “made whole
” for past failures.
We lost this battle. You may think differently and that’s ok. One of us is wrong and will be surprised by the outcome. If it ends up being you, I hope you will reconsider the argument for small raises over short duration in the future. But, if you do, don’t be surprised again when someone says that won’t work because we need to “made whole
” for past failures.
#253
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,898
Likes: 219
I honestly don’t see the company jumping on these small raises for short durations. And guess what happens when they don’t? They win big because they draw things out just as much and then when we get between what we asked for and the company’s concessionary ask it is even less and still 3-4 years late.
#254
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
I honestly don’t see the company jumping on these small raises for short durations. And guess what happens when they don’t? They win big because they draw things out just as much and then when we get between what we asked for and the company’s concessionary ask it is even less and still 3-4 years late.
#255
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 944
Likes: 69
From: NBC
The company has no incentive to move contract negotiations. At all:
- Endless supply of applicants
- Record acceptance of greenies
- Substantial profit considering the climate
- Govt backing
Until the government forces the company to get something accomplished, why budge?
Only a deep recession will motivate the company… to offer us a long term concessionary contract.
Hate to be Denny Downer, but it’s reality..
Edit: maybe we get actual FOM hat relief. Only worn with the jacket? The company may just do that as a jab, then eventually offer an “industry leading” contract, with the stipulation that we put our hats back on. For the right “price,” they incentivize us to vote to wear hats. Wouldn’t that be something?
- Endless supply of applicants
- Record acceptance of greenies
- Substantial profit considering the climate
- Govt backing
Until the government forces the company to get something accomplished, why budge?
Only a deep recession will motivate the company… to offer us a long term concessionary contract.
Hate to be Denny Downer, but it’s reality..
Edit: maybe we get actual FOM hat relief. Only worn with the jacket? The company may just do that as a jab, then eventually offer an “industry leading” contract, with the stipulation that we put our hats back on. For the right “price,” they incentivize us to vote to wear hats. Wouldn’t that be something?
#256
I have been at this airline since before contract 2000. We have never negotiated for an inflationary raise plus a small real raise, short duration. We have always been in the mode of fighting for past years and failures. You know “restoring the profession” and all of that. So you’re simply wrong if you think this has been tried. We always try to fight for lost battles and it shows. We’re not alone. The rest of the industry has done even more poorly than we have.
We lost this battle. You may think differently and that’s ok. One of us is wrong and will be surprised by the outcome. If it ends up being you, I hope you will reconsider the argument for small raises over short duration in the future. But, if you do, don’t be surprised again when someone says that won’t work because we need to “made whole
” for past failures.
We lost this battle. You may think differently and that’s ok. One of us is wrong and will be surprised by the outcome. If it ends up being you, I hope you will reconsider the argument for small raises over short duration in the future. But, if you do, don’t be surprised again when someone says that won’t work because we need to “made whole
” for past failures.
filler...
#257
You must be getting short then, that explains a lot. Explain to me how this works out in your mind. Short timers always have this great idea.
#258
NWA 1998: Amendable Oct 96 / Ratified Sept 98
DL C2K: Amendable May 2000 / Ratified June 2001 (made it to 30 day cooling off period, TA reached in super mediation)
NW 2002: Amendable Sept 2002 / Ratified Sept 2003
NW 2004 Bridge: Amenable Sept 2003 / Ratified Oct 2004
DL LOA #46: Amendable April 2005 / Ratified Nov 2004 (32.5% pay cut and increased number of 70 seat RJ's)
NW 2006: Amendable Dec 2006 / Ratified Mar 2006 (24% pay cut and introduced 50 seat RJ's)
DL LOA #56: Amendable Dec 2009 / Ratified May 2006 (14% pay cut and RJ seats from 70-76)
DL C2012: Amendable Dec 2012 / Ratified June 2012
CL C2015: Amendable Dec 2015 / Ratified Dec 2016 (I think we all know how TA-1 went)
So with the exception of C2012, the only contracts that were done on/before the amendable date were concessionary.
Anyone who thinks negotiating a 2 year deal like UA or AA means we will be right back at the table and actually have another new contract on time two years later needs their skull examined!
DL C2K: Amendable May 2000 / Ratified June 2001 (made it to 30 day cooling off period, TA reached in super mediation)
NW 2002: Amendable Sept 2002 / Ratified Sept 2003
NW 2004 Bridge: Amenable Sept 2003 / Ratified Oct 2004
DL LOA #46: Amendable April 2005 / Ratified Nov 2004 (32.5% pay cut and increased number of 70 seat RJ's)
NW 2006: Amendable Dec 2006 / Ratified Mar 2006 (24% pay cut and introduced 50 seat RJ's)
DL LOA #56: Amendable Dec 2009 / Ratified May 2006 (14% pay cut and RJ seats from 70-76)
DL C2012: Amendable Dec 2012 / Ratified June 2012
CL C2015: Amendable Dec 2015 / Ratified Dec 2016 (I think we all know how TA-1 went)
So with the exception of C2012, the only contracts that were done on/before the amendable date were concessionary.
Anyone who thinks negotiating a 2 year deal like UA or AA means we will be right back at the table and actually have another new contract on time two years later needs their skull examined!
#259
NWA 1998: Amendable Oct 96 / Ratified Sept 98
DL C2K: Amendable May 2000 / Ratified June 2001 (made it to 30 day cooling off period, TA reached in super mediation)
NW 2002: Amendable Sept 2002 / Ratified Sept 2003
NW 2004 Bridge: Amenable Sept 2003 / Ratified Oct 2004
DL LOA #46: Amendable April 2005 / Ratified Nov 2004 (32.5% pay cut and increased number of 70 seat RJ's)
NW 2006: Amendable Dec 2006 / Ratified Mar 2006 (24% pay cut and introduced 50 seat RJ's)
DL LOA #56: Amendable Dec 2009 / Ratified May 2006 (14% pay cut and RJ seats from 70-76)
DL C2012: Amendable Dec 2012 / Ratified June 2012
CL C2015: Amendable Dec 2015 / Ratified Dec 2016 (I think we all know how TA-1 went)
So with the exception of C2012, the only contracts that were done on/before the amendable date were concessionary.
Anyone who thinks negotiating a 2 year deal like UA or AA means we will be right back at the table and actually have another new contract on time two years later needs their skull examined!
DL C2K: Amendable May 2000 / Ratified June 2001 (made it to 30 day cooling off period, TA reached in super mediation)
NW 2002: Amendable Sept 2002 / Ratified Sept 2003
NW 2004 Bridge: Amenable Sept 2003 / Ratified Oct 2004
DL LOA #46: Amendable April 2005 / Ratified Nov 2004 (32.5% pay cut and increased number of 70 seat RJ's)
NW 2006: Amendable Dec 2006 / Ratified Mar 2006 (24% pay cut and introduced 50 seat RJ's)
DL LOA #56: Amendable Dec 2009 / Ratified May 2006 (14% pay cut and RJ seats from 70-76)
DL C2012: Amendable Dec 2012 / Ratified June 2012
CL C2015: Amendable Dec 2015 / Ratified Dec 2016 (I think we all know how TA-1 went)
So with the exception of C2012, the only contracts that were done on/before the amendable date were concessionary.
Anyone who thinks negotiating a 2 year deal like UA or AA means we will be right back at the table and actually have another new contract on time two years later needs their skull examined!
Here's a refresher about what was happening then and what Ed was up to. #virtualmerger
GOL https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...-gol#xj4y7vzkg
Virgin Atlantic https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-g...85302C20120604
AeroMexico https://money.cnn.com/2012/12/11/new...nes/index.html
Trainer https://news.delta.com/delta-subsidi...finery-complex
Last edited by notEnuf; 07-19-2022 at 11:11 AM.
#260
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
The company has no incentive to move contract negotiations. At all:
- Endless supply of applicants
- Record acceptance of greenies
- Substantial profit considering the climate
- Govt backing
Until the government forces the company to get something accomplished, why budge?
Only a deep recession will motivate the company… to offer us a long term concessionary contract.
Hate to be Denny Downer, but it’s reality..
Edit: maybe we get actual FOM hat relief. Only worn with the jacket? The company may just do that as a jab, then eventually offer an “industry leading” contract, with the stipulation that we put our hats back on. For the right “price,” they incentivize us to vote to wear hats. Wouldn’t that be something?
- Endless supply of applicants
- Record acceptance of greenies
- Substantial profit considering the climate
- Govt backing
Until the government forces the company to get something accomplished, why budge?
Only a deep recession will motivate the company… to offer us a long term concessionary contract.
Hate to be Denny Downer, but it’s reality..
Edit: maybe we get actual FOM hat relief. Only worn with the jacket? The company may just do that as a jab, then eventually offer an “industry leading” contract, with the stipulation that we put our hats back on. For the right “price,” they incentivize us to vote to wear hats. Wouldn’t that be something?
as people with no PIC, degree, nor extra resume points get hired regularly
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




