Originally Posted by Gunfighter
(Post 3701160)
I hadn't considered bidding for a route, then intentionally not serving it. I should have consulted the new Rules of the Road, where we aren't expected to "Always keep your deals".
|
Originally Posted by Tinpusher007
(Post 3701236)
DL is certainly not above doing this IMO.
|
Originally Posted by nene
(Post 3701259)
Not sure what you want from the company? They served pdx-nrt for years and operated a quasi hub from nrt. The game has changed and after getting the route initially approved the company obviously feels it can’t make money on that route. Without a Japanese partner it’s hard to justify a wide body from pdx-hnd. They asked to switch slot to one of our hubs to be able to fill a wide body. DOT says no, lose money or give up slot. Delta says ok it’s your slot. Not sure why you’d want your company to lose money on a route because the govt says pdx or bust. These kinds of deals are way the airlines spend $$$millions annually greasing the skids of DC.
|
Originally Posted by nene
(Post 3701259)
Not sure what you want from the company? They served pdx-nrt for years and operated a quasi hub from nrt. The game has changed and after getting the route initially approved the company obviously feels it can’t make money on that route. Without a Japanese partner it’s hard to justify a wide body from pdx-hnd. They asked to switch slot to one of our hubs to be able to fill a wide body. DOT says no, lose money or give up slot. Delta says ok it’s your slot. Not sure why you’d want your company to lose money on a route because the govt says pdx or bust. These kinds of deals are way the airlines spend $$$millions annually greasing the skids of DC.
|
Originally Posted by Nantonaku
(Post 3701302)
They haven’t operated the route in 3 years now. I guess the yields on the other routes are telling them they can’t make money. Maybe they don’t have the right equipment but Japan has a massive booming tourist industry. Fares this summer were crazy high and weeks went by without a single seat open to ANY market out of Japan. Does the slot require them to fly daily even in the slow seasons? Hopefully they can win it back out of another airport. I just read they announced they are starting HNL back up (someone said they might give that slot up too but it doesn’t sound like it).
|
Originally Posted by Nantonaku
(Post 3701302)
They haven’t operated the route in 3 years now. I guess the yields on the other routes are telling them they can’t make money. Maybe they don’t have the right equipment but Japan has a massive booming tourist industry. Fares this summer were crazy high and weeks went by without a single seat open to ANY market out of Japan. Does the slot require them to fly daily even in the slow seasons? Hopefully they can win it back out of another airport. I just read they announced they are starting HNL back up (someone said they might give that slot up too but it doesn’t sound like it).
|
Originally Posted by nene
(Post 3701259)
Not sure what you want from the company? They served pdx-nrt for years and operated a quasi hub from nrt. The game has changed and after getting the route initially approved the company obviously feels it can’t make money on that route. Without a Japanese partner it’s hard to justify a wide body from pdx-hnd. They asked to switch slot to one of our hubs to be able to fill a wide body. DOT says no, lose money or give up slot. Delta says ok it’s your slot. Not sure why you’d want your company to lose money on a route because the govt says pdx or bust. These kinds of deals are way the airlines spend $$$millions annually greasing the skids of DC.
|
A350 has had a resurgence this year, certainly makes negotiating harder. Probably had a better shot at a good deal last year if they went and signed on the dotted line when first rumored.
https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/air-fran...rder-1.1976027 |
Originally Posted by Cranberry
(Post 3701498)
A350 has had a resurgence this year, certainly makes negotiating harder. Probably had a better shot at a good deal last year if they went and signed on the dotted line when first rumored.
https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/air-fran...rder-1.1976027 |
Originally Posted by Cranberry
(Post 3701498)
A350 has had a resurgence this year, certainly makes negotiating harder. Probably had a better shot at a good deal last year if they went and signed on the dotted line when first rumored.
https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/air-fran...rder-1.1976027 |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:13 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands