![]() |
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 3564166)
…. We are spending a lot of time calculating what we should have gotten for retro pay, but I bet within a year we will wish we had a “‘me too” clause with our Delta Flight attendants pay raises, instead of United or American pilots.
My guess is 5 months. Anyone else care to guess when, or if it will happen? |
Originally Posted by notEnuf
(Post 3564279)
I have always thought we should have a me too for the non-cons post amendable date. If the company can afford a 4% raise for the majority of the employees we should get it too, while working out the details of the PWA. Our contract never expires but yet our payscale does, how stupid is that?
|
Id prefer that if anyone in the western world gets a raise, including congress, we get that plus 1%.
|
Originally Posted by Flyweight
(Post 3564286)
Id prefer that if anyone in the western world gets a raise, including congress, we get that plus 1%.
|
I have zero interest in any me-too with other Delta work groups…other than maybe Ed.
|
Originally Posted by TED74
(Post 3564323)
I have zero interest in any me-too with other Delta work groups…other than maybe Ed.
|
Originally Posted by TED74
(Post 3564323)
I have zero interest in any me-too with other Delta work groups…other than maybe Ed.
|
Originally Posted by notEnuf
(Post 3564393)
So you are fine with pay stagnation after 4 years when your contract is again overdue? The whole retro fiasco, slowed/rushed timeline for the PWA would be moo. Explain to me why you don't want a pay mechanism that accounts for the non expiration of the perpetual PWA.
|
Originally Posted by Jaww
(Post 3564400)
Im for a mechanism, but not one tied to non-cons. This will eventually boomerang on us.
If the company has enough to pay other employees after crying broke to us — pay us a percentage too. If the company has enough money to pay millions to buy 49% of another airline — give us a 5% raise. If the company has enough money to buy stock back — pay us too. We should always be looking to think out of the box for our advantage. You can best believe the company is always doing this. It’s why we keep getting beat. |
Originally Posted by notEnuf
(Post 3564393)
So you are fine with pay stagnation after 4 years when your contract is again overdue? The whole retro fiasco, slowed/rushed timeline for the PWA would be moo. Explain to me why you don't want a pay mechanism that accounts for the non expiration of the perpetual PWA.
If you want to correlate our pay in some way to executive compensation, that’s a different animal. But no, I honestly don’t want to synch up with 20,000 employees whose job qualifications and training couldn’t be more different than mine. That type of trigger might sound like a nice backstop, but it wouldn’t come without negotiations and likely some quid pro quo. No thanks. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:47 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands