![]() |
Originally Posted by bluejuice71
(Post 3606750)
Aren’t we still on the clock 30 minutes after our in time? And aside from that you’re losing sight these people are paying your salary. Take 20 minutes and personally thank them for flying Delta. It’s the right thing to do. Plus, we are supposed to stay until last person deplanes unless there is an operational need to leave early. Don’t use lame excuses like industry standard. There’s a reason we are not industry standard and it’s little things like standing in the doorway and thanking our paying passengers.
|
Blue juice … tell us you don’t fly narrowbody domestic without telling us you don’t fly narrowbody domestic.
|
Originally Posted by Planetrain
(Post 3606021)
I’m on the other end of the spectrum. Pilots/flight attendants/mechanics/gate agents… each position needs 1 uniform. (2 if we’re going to do summer/winter.). It looks better as a group and has functionality identifying who works here.
The ultimate experiment in comfort was years ago when we did BCRF month and as an employee (not pilots) if you made a donation, you could wear a pink t-shirt and jeans ALL MONTH. It was almost comical watching passengers come up the jet bridge and couldn’t find the gate agent to ask about connections, particularly international connecting customers that didn’t understand the fundraiser or speak English. Imagine the chaos of a bunch of t-shirts trying to corral passengers evacuating a jet if we had an emergency. On top of that, we looked like trash. Some can pull off pick-your-own-jeans day, some insist on 3 sizes too small! Dress for the job you want. If we all dress like train engineers, expect to get paid like a train engineer. https://media--cldnry-s--nbcnews-com...29p-67c3c0.jpg |
Originally Posted by Tropical
(Post 3606709)
I really hope Delta gives serious consideration that a staple will bring in many who were turned down by Delta, turned down the flow, or didn't bother to make the effort to get hired. Delta would be much wiser to just shut endeavor down, bring the 900s to mainline, and give the endeavor pilots preferential interviews. That's about the only way to weed out the large amount of undesirables at the top of their list who will never otherwise make the cut. If they were all given a free ride, what a slap in the face it would be to all who busted their butts and did all the right things to be invited in the front door here. It would surely hurt recruiting efforts doing forward and would be a mockery of the standards this company claims they uphold.
|
Originally Posted by Baradium
(Post 3606792)
Since they were offered a flow already, that comment not only doesn't make sense but is an unnecessary attack. At this point the QC point is out the window, I'd much rather get the flying in house while there is a potential to.
|
Originally Posted by BusDrvr
(Post 3606787)
Train engineers still have a pension!
|
Originally Posted by BusDrvr
(Post 3606787)
Train engineers still have a pension!
|
Originally Posted by BusDrvr
(Post 3606787)
Train engineers still have a pension!
|
Originally Posted by Tropical
(Post 3606709)
I really hope Delta gives serious consideration that a staple will bring in many who were turned down by Delta, turned down the flow, or didn't bother to make the effort to get hired. Delta would be much wiser to just shut endeavor down, bring the 900s to mainline, and give the endeavor pilots preferential interviews. That's about the only way to weed out the large amount of undesirables at the top of their list who will never otherwise make the cut. If they were all given a free ride, what a slap in the face it would be to all who busted their butts and did all the right things to be invited in the front door here. It would surely hurt recruiting efforts doing forward and would be a mockery of the standards this company claims they uphold.
|
Originally Posted by Baradium
(Post 3606792)
Since they were offered a flow already, that comment not only doesn't make sense but is an unnecessary attack. At this point the QC point is out the window, I'd much rather get the flying in house while there is a potential to.
And pilots at regionals have been flying Delta pax on jets since the 1994 and turbo props well before that. If there's a QC problem that's on Delta, they hired me and all my subpar friends. NWA hired connection and Delta hired airlink well before the merg. |
I swear some people go out of their way to be as miserable as possible. Thank god this forum isn’t a representation of life on the line, for me.
|
Originally Posted by BusDrvr
(Post 3606787)
Train engineers still have a pension!
|
Originally Posted by ancman;[url=tel:3606515
3606515[/url]]I saw him lecturing another bellhop about how unprofessional it is to not be wearing the hat, and how he knew the hat was a requirement when he applied.
He also mentioned that hotel management will start cracking down and firing employees at the already short-staffed hotel who aren’t wearing this “iconic” symbol. |
Originally Posted by dbrownie
(Post 3606911)
So do lots of Delta employees (and pilots) point?
|
So a customer is about to buy a $700 ticket for their trip and sees one priced at $699 (DL, DBJ and hat adorned pilots) and another ticket for $698 (OL, their pilots wearing no fancy hat or jacket). Guess which ticket gets sold.
I'll wear whatever's required but have no illusion it drives customer purchasing decisions. |
Originally Posted by FliesInSoup
(Post 3607749)
So a customer is about to buy a $700 ticket for their trip and sees one priced at $699 (DL, DBJ and hat adorned pilots) and another ticket for $698 (OL, their pilots wearing no fancy hat or jacket). Guess which ticket gets sold.
I'll wear whatever's required but have no illusion it drives customer purchasing decisions. It’s not the single line item, it’s part of the whole package which drives purchase decisions. The kind of customer we want is the one who is influenced by what we deem trivial uniform. Those same ones are influenced by the bamboo cutlery, personalized bag tags, parade sponsorships, sustainable fuel, etc. Yes, we are cheap airline pilots and trip over each other to pick up a nickel and happily brag on our steals at Costco. We wouldn’t be bamboozled paying full price for first class tickets or using the company card for full fare coach. I argue we don’t understand the uniform impact because we aren’t the customer influenced by it. (Other than microagression influence of headphones and backpacks on both shoulders which scream guard-meow). The managers are making the revenue premium on customers that will pay extra for the experience: empty middle seats during Covid, premium select, comfort+, free internet, tv screens with current content, nice new terminals like LAX, SLC, and LGA. It’s called product segmentation and (perceived) product differentiation on an otherwise commodity. We’ll happily take the family of 5 with crying babies that sit in the last row in basic economy, but the money is made on less price sensitive customers that spoil their fur babies with refrigerated dog food. The uniform isn’t the deal breaker- just like a car with 8 cup holders doesn’t tip the scale on one with only 7, rather it’s part of the whole calculus. I agree, I am not influenced by the waitress wearing sweat pants serving chicken fingers. Good food is good food. But the customers with loose wallets want their waiter in a suit if they’re going to fork over a hefty bill. |
Originally Posted by saturn
(Post 3605973)
This whole battle of uniform importance lives in the minds of deltoid pilots. You put way too much stock in NPS questions, as if the same questioned asked to a UA customer (How well dressed was your pilot?) would be terribly different. Passengers don't care that much about the nuance in buttons on your jacket, or your blazer color, etc.
Funny we have folks debating the dignity of our brand image, yet our corporate side has no problem outsourcing 1500+ daily flights to Skywest, Republic, EDV, (and historically several others) whose uniforms pieces include no hats, single breasted blazers, trench-coat, leather coat, sweater with epaulets, navy blue colors, different brass etc, all while being thanked for flying Delta. Guess what? Corporate not only knows most folks think they're still flying on Delta when they board that E175, they proactively try to blur the distinction. OBTW, I know our NPS on SKW is still very high, probably others too. So yeah, If we switched buttons on our suit, or got a modern materials real coat option, etc, it would make an insignificant impact on our brand or bottom line. Most impactful in the minds of people who's identity is tied to their uniform. |
Originally Posted by Planetrain
(Post 3607793)
I’m not hating, just want to share another opinion:
It’s not the single line item, it’s part of the whole package which drives purchase decisions. The kind of customer we want is the one who is influenced by what we deem trivial uniform. Those same ones are influenced by the bamboo cutlery, personalized bag tags, parade sponsorships, sustainable fuel, etc. Yes, we are cheap airline pilots and trip over each other to pick up a nickel and happily brag on our steals at Costco. We wouldn’t be bamboozled paying full price for first class tickets or using the company card for full fare coach. I argue we don’t understand the uniform impact because we aren’t the customer influenced by it. (Other than microagression influence of headphones and backpacks on both shoulders which scream guard-meow). The managers are making the revenue premium on customers that will pay extra for the experience: empty middle seats during Covid, premium select, comfort+, free internet, tv screens with current content, nice new terminals like LAX, SLC, and LGA. It’s called product segmentation and (perceived) product differentiation on an otherwise commodity. We’ll happily take the family of 5 with crying babies that sit in the last row in basic economy, but the money is made on less price sensitive customers that spoil their fur babies with refrigerated dog food. The uniform isn’t the deal breaker- just like a car with 8 cup holders doesn’t tip the scale on one with only 7, rather it’s part of the whole calculus. I agree, I am not influenced by the waitress wearing sweat pants serving chicken fingers. Good food is good food. But the customers with loose wallets want their waiter in a suit if they’re going to fork over a hefty bill. filler |
Originally Posted by FliesInSoup
(Post 3607749)
So a customer is about to buy a $700 ticket for their trip and sees one priced at $699 (DL, DBJ and hat adorned pilots) and another ticket for $698 (OL, their pilots wearing no fancy hat or jacket). Guess which ticket gets sold.
I'll wear whatever's required but have no illusion it drives customer purchasing decisions. |
Customers also don't buy tickets based on what our flight attendants look like.
|
Originally Posted by Baradium
(Post 3607940)
Considering we have a revenue premium, which by definition means people pay more to fly on us. The answer is obvious that they will run to pay the extra $1 for a Delta ticket.
The most likely thing a pilot can wear that will impress a customer is a smile. Everyone's got one and it doesn't cost a thing. |
Originally Posted by FliesInSoup
(Post 3607989)
The revenue premium collected is not for the DBJ or hat. It is for the DL package, as mentioned above. I'll suggest it's due to the on-time performance, irop recovery (which the customer just sees as DL's "plan B" when things go bad), free bag, decent check-in experience, bording, in-flight comfort and amenities. We also get more for the origination/destination pairings and frequency of flights. These are the things customers are willing to pay a bit more for. Not the pilot costume. It helps convey the image, and the marketing of the brand, but no one has ever said, "I'll pay more to see that DBJ and hat". Instead, they'll pay more to get from "A to B" in reasonable comfort and the least amount of hassle.
The most likely thing a pilot can wear that will impress a customer is a smile. Everyone's got one and it doesn't cost a thing. |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by fishforfun
(Post 3605577)
For international it will be 3 different when you include the black north face jacket.
|
Originally Posted by FliesInSoup
(Post 3607989)
The revenue premium collected is not for the DBJ or hat. It is for the DL package, as mentioned above. I'll suggest it's due to the on-time performance, irop recovery (which the customer just sees as DL's "plan B" when things go bad), free bag, decent check-in experience, bording, in-flight comfort and amenities. We also get more for the origination/destination pairings and frequency of flights. These are the things customers are willing to pay a bit more for. Not the pilot costume. It helps convey the image, and the marketing of the brand, but no one has ever said, "I'll pay more to see that DBJ and hat". Instead, they'll pay more to get from "A to B" in reasonable comfort and the least amount of hassle.
The most likely thing a pilot can wear that will impress a customer is a smile. Everyone's got one and it doesn't cost a thing. If you were to walk into a Ritz Carlton, and see the people behind the desk, the bellhop, the doorman… All dressed in ratty sweatpants, what would you think about the business? Conversely, if you went into a less-than-luxury, but decent hotel, and all the employees you met were dressed well above the competition, with well fitting, professional, and coordinated uniforms, what would you think of that hotel? Even if their behavior was bland… Said ‘uniforms’ are not the sole determiner of your experience. That’s laughable. But don’t fool yourself into thinking that doesn’t play an important role in the overall impression with which you walk away from that business. Nor, that “literally no one would care”. I don’t honk the people saying that actually believe that. If a business is trying to set itself apart, as Delta management clearly is (and successfully so, as evidenced by our “revenue premium”), the image & behavior of it’s employees, especially the ‘flagship’ pilots, is important. Why do you think PB has such a **** over the hats? Seriously. We can disagree on the level it matters, but it’s not binary. |
Originally Posted by FangsF15
(Post 3608011)
People are talking about the uniform as if it were a binary scale. It’s obviously not. But let’s use that to illustrate, using some hyperbole.
If you were to walk into a Ritz Carlton, and see the people behind the desk, the bellhop, the doorman… All dressed in ratty sweatpants, what would you think about the business? Conversely, if you went into a less-than-luxury, but decent hotel, and all the employees you met were dressed well above the competition, with well fitting, professional, and coordinated uniforms, what would you think of that hotel? Even if their behavior was bland… Said ‘uniforms’ are not the sole determiner of your experience. That’s laughable. But don’t fool yourself into thinking that doesn’t play an important role in the overall impression with which you walk away from that business. Nor, that “literally no one would care”. I don’t honk the people saying that actually believe that. If a business is trying to set itself apart, as Delta management clearly is (and successfully so, as evidenced by our “revenue premium”), the image & behavior of it’s employees, especially the ‘flagship’ pilots, is important. Why do you think PB has such a **** over the hats? Seriously. We can disagree on the level it matters, but it’s not binary. Your analogy would make sense if you and everyone else can tell me without looking up online what color their jackets are and how many buttons they have. |
Originally Posted by FangsF15
(Post 3608011)
People are talking about the uniform as if it were a binary scale. It’s obviously not. But let’s use that to illustrate, using some hyperbole.
If you were to walk into a Ritz Carlto..... We can disagree on the level it matters, but it’s not binary.
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 3608016)
Yeah, but your analogy is flawed. First, because w......
Your analogy would make sense if you and everyone else can tell me without looking up online what color their jackets are and how many buttons they have. I wonder what the definition is of, "A reading comprehension problem"? Is that when somebody reads to just to argue and fails to understand the overarching theme? |
Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
(Post 3608023)
I wonder what the definition is of, "A reading comprehension problem"? Is that when somebody reads to just to argue and fails to understand the overarching theme?
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 3608026)
It's a bad analogy because we are all arguing about one or two rows of buttons and he comes in and argues that people would notice if Ritz employees were wearing sweatpants. Of course they would. But we aren't arguing if people would notice if we started wearing our pajamas to work. We are arguing whether our legafy uniform makes people want to book with us.
|
Originally Posted by Whoopsmybad
(Post 3608034)
I don’t think he was arguing rows of buttons, but an actual uniform and what I can do for the overall brand image.
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 3608040)
Fair enough..there are enough quotes and enough people arguing different nuances. I agree it's important to look professional. That includes wear the designated uniform. I don't think the specific uniform matters, as long as it looks professional.
|
Originally Posted by overqualified52
(Post 3607571)
which pilots still have pensions ? Fed Ex and UPS do I think but other than that no one. Hopefully everyone’s 401K doesn’t go by the way of Silicon Valley Bank. 💀
Most DL pilots hired prior to 9/11 have a PBGC benefit. It may not be a pension but it’s an annuity that’s paid out for the rest of their life. Worth noting this isn’t much of a benefit at all for those hired in the late 90s- early 2000s. But from the numbers thrown around by guys hired in the 80s and early 90s, it’s not insignificant. |
Originally Posted by beernutt
(Post 3606719)
Kaboom. Somebody had to say it. Thanks.
I don’t think Delta pilots are better than anyone else or any of the hate that’s going to come from this post but when you remove the last chance at any QC whatsoever then you get what you get and it’s not always what you want. |
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
(Post 3608136)
some (not all) former NW pilots have a frozen pension. In some cases it’s worth a substantial amount.
Most DL pilots hired prior to 9/11 have a PBGC benefit. It may not be a pension but it’s an annuity that’s paid out for the rest of their life. Worth noting this isn’t much of a benefit at all for those hired in the late 90s- early 2000s. But from the numbers thrown around by guys hired in the 80s and early 90s, it’s not insignificant. |
Originally Posted by notEnuf
(Post 3608273)
Literally everyone from the bankruptcy era except pre merger Delta pilots has a frozen pension.
|
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
(Post 3608311)
yeah. Pretty effed up they froze everyone else’s pension but terminated the pilots.
|
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 3608577)
The pilots voted for it.
|
Originally Posted by Whoopsmybad
(Post 3608582)
Watch out, you are going to wake up the we had no choice crowd.
|
Originally Posted by notEnuf
(Post 3608273)
Literally everyone from the bankruptcy era except pre merger Delta pilots has a frozen pension.
|
Originally Posted by formerdal
(Post 3608712)
Does ANYONE know what literally means????? and oh, BTW not true.
|
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
(Post 3608311)
yeah. Pretty effed up they froze everyone else’s pension but terminated the pilots.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:37 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands