Outsider Noob Hub Question
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 3,501
Likes: 1,001
When we basically bought LATAM there was a strong indication we might, just might open a Miami base. Obviously that did not come to fruition. Delta never openz new bases we only close them. And with the super base of PTC mafia in ATL, there is little to no chance of ever getting a base anywhere else in the southeast. If we were to open a new base my money is on Boston.
#12
.
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 678
Theres no chance of them consolidating MSP and DTW into a single base. Come on now. Maybe consolidating international in DTW and making MSP a domestic base like SLC with just a few W trips to cover the usual codeshare hubs.
I could see HPN becoming a satellite of LGA. We're doing a lot of flights out of there now. A 717 buddy told me they're even going direct to PBI and MCO now. Does mainline even fly to SWF?
Boston makes sense but it has nothing to do with union politics. Our union is so weak they're no threat to whatever the company wants and they'll always have the votes in ATL. Not opening BOS is because they don't have room. The Taj Mullin is too small and too cramped for what we already have there and Massport is already charging us out the wazoo. My bet is they're waiting to see what happens with JetBlue/Spirit too. Not to mention that a BOS base would make NYC staffing even worse.
I could see HPN becoming a satellite of LGA. We're doing a lot of flights out of there now. A 717 buddy told me they're even going direct to PBI and MCO now. Does mainline even fly to SWF?
Boston makes sense but it has nothing to do with union politics. Our union is so weak they're no threat to whatever the company wants and they'll always have the votes in ATL. Not opening BOS is because they don't have room. The Taj Mullin is too small and too cramped for what we already have there and Massport is already charging us out the wazoo. My bet is they're waiting to see what happens with JetBlue/Spirit too. Not to mention that a BOS base would make NYC staffing even worse.
SWF is all Allegiant, NetJets and Play (ULCC to Iceland) it seems now, but as NY airports max on capacity I can see it coming into play. I have flown the ER out of there, but that was a charter.
Consolidating MSP and DTW isn't realistic/logical but that has never stopped them before.
BOS has room. Seen it. Been in it. Could be move in ready in a week.
Disagree on the union thing. Right now, with ATL getting 4 votes, (and likely to stay that way unless we open a huge FL base, also unlikely) I am sure they factor that into their calculations. Something big enough to go to MEMRAT they have to convince all of us to pass it. Right now, if it's good for ATL and 2 other bases, it's probably gonna pass MEC. And then the commuter heavy bases get whacked with it. Add another base (BOS, MCO) and then the deal has to be good for them too. As of now, if the deal is a no brainer for ATL, they are already halfway there.
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 3,501
Likes: 1,001
HPN I can see them trying to add. That is a stupidly expensive cab ride though. But again, not beyond what a LAX commuter has to deal with when they get a SNA or ONT trip.
SWF is all Allegiant, NetJets and Play (ULCC to Iceland) it seems now, but as NY airports max on capacity I can see it coming into play. I have flown the ER out of there, but that was a charter.
Consolidating MSP and DTW isn't realistic/logical but that has never stopped them before.
BOS has room. Seen it. Been in it. Could be move in ready in a week.
Disagree on the union thing. Right now, with ATL getting 4 votes, (and likely to stay that way unless we open a huge FL base, also unlikely) I am sure they factor that into their calculations. Something big enough to go to MEMRAT they have to convince all of us to pass it. Right now, if it's good for ATL and 2 other bases, it's probably gonna pass MEC. And then the commuter heavy bases get whacked with it. Add another base (BOS, MCO) and then the deal has to be good for them too. As of now, if the deal is a no brainer for ATL, they are already halfway there.
SWF is all Allegiant, NetJets and Play (ULCC to Iceland) it seems now, but as NY airports max on capacity I can see it coming into play. I have flown the ER out of there, but that was a charter.
Consolidating MSP and DTW isn't realistic/logical but that has never stopped them before.
BOS has room. Seen it. Been in it. Could be move in ready in a week.
Disagree on the union thing. Right now, with ATL getting 4 votes, (and likely to stay that way unless we open a huge FL base, also unlikely) I am sure they factor that into their calculations. Something big enough to go to MEMRAT they have to convince all of us to pass it. Right now, if it's good for ATL and 2 other bases, it's probably gonna pass MEC. And then the commuter heavy bases get whacked with it. Add another base (BOS, MCO) and then the deal has to be good for them too. As of now, if the deal is a no brainer for ATL, they are already halfway there.
#14
Banned
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 671
Likes: 11
We don't have a NYC angry puppy category anymore though. I don't think a handful of mainline 717 flights is justification for making HPN a satellite. As for BOS, it could easily be a 320 base tomorrow; simply swap out every 737 flight with a 320. 220 would probably fit as well. But we work for Delta Air Lines where making simple things more complex than they need to be is how we do business.
HPN I can see them trying to add. That is a stupidly expensive cab ride though. But again, not beyond what a LAX commuter has to deal with when they get a SNA or ONT trip.
SWF is all Allegiant, NetJets and Play (ULCC to Iceland) it seems now, but as NY airports max on capacity I can see it coming into play. I have flown the ER out of there, but that was a charter.
Consolidating MSP and DTW isn't realistic/logical but that has never stopped them before.
BOS has room. Seen it. Been in it. Could be move in ready in a week.
Disagree on the union thing. Right now, with ATL getting 4 votes, (and likely to stay that way unless we open a huge FL base, also unlikely) I am sure they factor that into their calculations. Something big enough to go to MEMRAT they have to convince all of us to pass it. Right now, if it's good for ATL and 2 other bases, it's probably gonna pass MEC. And then the commuter heavy bases get whacked with it. Add another base (BOS, MCO) and then the deal has to be good for them too. As of now, if the deal is a no brainer for ATL, they are already halfway there.
SWF is all Allegiant, NetJets and Play (ULCC to Iceland) it seems now, but as NY airports max on capacity I can see it coming into play. I have flown the ER out of there, but that was a charter.
Consolidating MSP and DTW isn't realistic/logical but that has never stopped them before.
BOS has room. Seen it. Been in it. Could be move in ready in a week.
Disagree on the union thing. Right now, with ATL getting 4 votes, (and likely to stay that way unless we open a huge FL base, also unlikely) I am sure they factor that into their calculations. Something big enough to go to MEMRAT they have to convince all of us to pass it. Right now, if it's good for ATL and 2 other bases, it's probably gonna pass MEC. And then the commuter heavy bases get whacked with it. Add another base (BOS, MCO) and then the deal has to be good for them too. As of now, if the deal is a no brainer for ATL, they are already halfway there.
Union politics and memrat? GMAB. The only time we've ever shot a deal down was TA1. That was a no brainer. The company has no fear of memrat. And even on issues they do, they know the union will have their backs, like when Hartmann gave away batch sizes. Still no explanation of why that was handled how it was. Shut up and get back to rowing. No, the company doesn't fear this union any more.
#15
.
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 678
Why does 44 get 4 votes? They're bigger? So what? NYC is almost the same size as ATL, if they add on HPN and Stewart then it will most likely grow more. Your comment about base opening is a real concern for the PTC crowd. Very prescient of you. I'm fully convinced there were ulterior motives around closing the DFW base then the CVG base. HINT: They were not fans of the 4th floor or the 44 crowd. But that's just me with my tinfoil hat on. You can search around here and other forums that talk about it, DFW in particular. Conincidence? Perhaps not.
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,563
Likes: 220
From: UNA
All they'd have to do is switch out 717s for 319/320s which are already in LGA. Cab ride? Company doesn't care, that's the pilots problem. Just like getting out to ONT. Likely HPN trips would never go to reserve, just like EWR trips, because so many pilots live in CT. They'll grab them all.
Union politics and memrat? GMAB. The only time we've ever shot a deal down was TA1. That was a no brainer. The company has no fear of memrat. And even on issues they do, they know the union will have their backs, like when Hartmann gave away batch sizes. Still no explanation of why that was handled how it was. Shut up and get back to rowing. No, the company doesn't fear this union any more.
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,523
Likes: 1,113
That's basically it.. It's in the ALPA bylaws. ATL is big enough that it gets 2 reps per seat. Without digging into it, I can't say how much smaller they have to be to go back to 2, (don't forget SIM which is very ATL heavy) but lets just say we had some massive ATL exodous to a MCO base. If ATL remains a 4 vote council, its power is diluted by even the smallest council having 2 MEC reps.
#18
.
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 678
Last time I looked, ATL's 4 votes actually waters down their membership's voting power especially when you consider SEA has two votes. And, in reality, it really doesn't matter. If a minority council thinks a vote is unfair, they can call for a roll call vote and each rep can vote with as many votes as pilots they represent. Not to spoil it too much, but that gives ATL even more power.
Last I looked at it NYC had a more members per vote if a roll call is called, but straight up numbers they get half the votes of Atlanta.
If you look at this as a "everyone has their price" standpoint, if there's more people there's a much greater cost.
*not saying there is any impropriety amongst ALPA reps. Just stating its harder to convincee 11 people than 9, especially when they may not have same end goals"
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,523
Likes: 1,113
Yes I kNow they can call a roll call
Last I looked at it NYC had a more members per vote if a roll call is called, but straight up numbers they get half the votes of Atlanta.
If you look at this as a "everyone has their price" standpoint, if there's more people there's a much greater cost.
*not saying there is any impropriety amongst ALPA reps. Just stating its harder to convincee 11 people than 9, especially when they may not have same end goals"
Last I looked at it NYC had a more members per vote if a roll call is called, but straight up numbers they get half the votes of Atlanta.
If you look at this as a "everyone has their price" standpoint, if there's more people there's a much greater cost.
*not saying there is any impropriety amongst ALPA reps. Just stating its harder to convincee 11 people than 9, especially when they may not have same end goals"
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



