![]() |
I’m sorry, but if you show up impaired after getting an appropriate nights sleep (8 hours uninterrupted sleep opportunity comes to mind) you must have been pretty damned polluted when you turned out the light. The idea you can’t have a beer or a glass of wine with dinner on a layover is ridiculous. Power drinking however has no place on a layover.
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 3930875)
It's been awhile since indoc, but I thought if you stepped onto the airplane, even HIMS couldn't save you.
Alcohol is a serious drug addiction but because it’s legal is often not viewed in the same light as other addictions. Most pilots are intelligent enough to know if they have an alcohol issue but just won’t quite acknowledge it and taking that step to self report is very difficult. If you pack a bottle for a trip or feel the need to consume alcohol almost every day it might be time for some self reflection. My family has a terrible record with alcohol which has kept me cautious. Most alcoholics are blissfully unaware of the effects their drinking has on their family. Pilots at Delta are very lucky to have the HIMS program. Getting those who need it into the program is the hard part. |
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 3930875)
It's been awhile since indoc, but I thought if you stepped onto the airplane, even HIMS couldn't save you.
Depending how one enters HIMS at Delta there are three basic outcomes after the successful completion of treatment Keep your job Get fired, but get job back once you have regained medical and/or certificates Get fired Delta will always pay for a pilots treatment no matter which of those three circumstances. Generally speaking, an individual entering HIMS like this falls unders the second course. |
Originally Posted by crewdawg
(Post 3930970)
Hearing that this may be the case. Either way, another great example of not throwing your fellow pilots under the bus.
|
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3930837)
it’s relevant to call it out precisely because it would not have been mentioned if it were a male pilot (which it has been, many times without such labeling)
Not that my opinion on this event is worth a hill of beans, but I don't see anything 'there' on this one. |
I haven’t logged in here in years but I had to for this…..
False positive. She was removed by authorities so there was no choice but to take action on the flight. Multiple tests. Multiple negatives. She was held an insanely long time and released. False positive. But the damage is done thanks to then “news”. |
Originally Posted by MaxQ
(Post 3931039)
Normally I align with your world view OOfff, but on this one it comes across as a bit prickly and silly. This one really isn't misogynic. It could be argued as relevant due to the majority of pilots being male, hence the reference to gender.
Not that my opinion on this event is worth a hill of beans, but I don't see anything 'there' on this one. |
Thankfully, this may have turned out to be a false positive.
|
Originally Posted by Opsmgrguy
(Post 3931041)
I haven’t logged in here in years but I had to for this…..
False positive. She was removed by authorities so there was no choice but to take action on the flight. Multiple tests. Multiple negatives. She was held an insanely long time and released. False positive. But the damage is done thanks to then “news”. |
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 3931053)
Except it doesn't matter at all if the pilot was male or female or minority or white. The person was intentionally not identified so other than using pronouns to describe him or her, the gender has literally no bearing on this.
As an employee of a reputationally hard drinking airline, the days of old are mostly gone—but it doesn’t take much to get in trouble these days. We all know the textbook measures for the various “what if” scenarios but many still get tagged, some needlessly so. I have empathy for these situations—in this case a lawsuit may be forthcoming. By all means, if you need help please get it. That goes for addiction, stress, physical health etc. You are too valuable to needlessly suffer! |
Originally Posted by saltbae
(Post 3931064)
sooo she’s getting a big pay day from someone
I can’t imagine DL would be at fault i imagine their cops have something similar to QI which renders them immune to lawsuits. Even if they don’t, they probably have laws set up to shield them from lawsuits. The fact they didn’t identify her will probably be enough to keep them from having any liability the press didn’t report anything that was not made public by the police. its terrible what happened to her but odds are she is SOL on getting any kind of meaningful payment for having her reputation trashed. |
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
(Post 3931066)
from who?
I can’t imagine DL would be at fault i imagine their cops have something similar to QI which renders them immune to lawsuits. Even if they don’t, they probably have laws set up to shield them from lawsuits. The fact they didn’t identify her will probably be enough to keep them from having any liability the press didn’t report anything that was not made public by the police. its terrible what happened to her but odds are she is SOL on getting any kind of meaningful payment for having her reputation trashed. |
Originally Posted by tennisguru
(Post 3931070)
Well at a minimum she’ll get a ton of RR pay for going into her day(s) off…
|
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
(Post 3931072)
will she if the reason for the RR is detainment by local police?
|
Originally Posted by Khantahr
(Post 3931078)
She better since it wasn't her fault!
|
Originally Posted by at6d
(Post 3931065)
I agree that gender has no bearing on incidents like this. “Pilot” or “crew member” would have sufficed.
As an employee of a reputationally hard drinking airline, the days of old are mostly gone—but it doesn’t take much to get in trouble these days. We all know the textbook measures for the various “what if” scenarios but many still get tagged, some needlessly so. I have empathy for these situations—in this case a lawsuit may be forthcoming. By all means, if you need help please get it. That goes for addiction, stress, physical health etc. You are too valuable to needlessly suffer! 1-2-3. filler |
Wow, what is a false positive on an alcohol test? They did a breathalyzer and then a blood test? I’d imagine Delta would be out for money too. That one article said Delta, under EU rules, is out near $400k in passenger fines as well as hotel and meal fees for all passengers. Delta also has a brand to protect. Europe is pretty ridiculous, things like this only add to the stereotype. They didn’t have a way to figure this out before it turned into a few million dollar mishap and defame a Delta pilot?
|
Originally Posted by Peoplemvr
(Post 3931111)
1-2-3.
filler
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3931012)
Thats a bit of an old wives tail and might refer more to the legal side. It’s more of a case by case basis. There have also been many pilots relapse and still get another chance. I know one who went through the program 3 times. Self reporting and entering the program can give a pilot more options than if it is mandatory following an incident.
Alcohol is a serious drug addiction but because it’s legal is often not viewed in the same light as other addictions. Most pilots are intelligent enough to know if they have an alcohol issue but just won’t quite acknowledge it and taking that step to self report is very difficult. If you pack a bottle for a trip or feel the need to consume alcohol almost every day it might be time for some self reflection. My family has a terrible record with alcohol which has kept me cautious. Most alcoholics are blissfully unaware of the effects their drinking has on their family. Pilots at Delta are very lucky to have the HIMS program. Getting those who need it into the program is the hard part. |
Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
(Post 3931088)
And she better get PAID time off to recover from the stress and trauma of the whole ordeal. Knowing how cheap flight ops is they'll just offer to personal drop her next trip without pay.
|
Originally Posted by Whoopsmybad
(Post 3930985)
FAs too. Just don’t make the headlines nearly as heavy when it’s them.
|
Originally Posted by Opsmgrguy
(Post 3931041)
I haven’t logged in here in years but I had to for this…..
False positive. She was removed by authorities so there was no choice but to take action on the flight. Multiple tests. Multiple negatives. She was held an insanely long time and released. False positive. But the damage is done thanks to then “news”.
Originally Posted by saltbae
(Post 3931064)
sooo she’s getting a big pay day from someone
|
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
(Post 3931066)
from who?
I can’t imagine DL would be at fault i imagine their cops have something similar to QI which renders them immune to lawsuits. Even if they don’t, they probably have laws set up to shield them from lawsuits. The fact they didn’t identify her will probably be enough to keep them from having any liability the press didn’t report anything that was not made public by the police. its terrible what happened to her but odds are she is SOL on getting any kind of meaningful payment for having her reputation trashed. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3931149)
Glad to hear, she's good with job/career.
In Sweden? I doubt it. Most especially if the offender is a person of governance. |
Originally Posted by cencal83406
(Post 3931166)
Any particular reason you’d assume you can’t get compensated for a government action shown to have been harmful and incorrect?
|
Originally Posted by saltbae
(Post 3931168)
police departments paying millions in settlements every day to victims
|
Originally Posted by nene
(Post 3931139)
According to Hunter (recent expert on subject), alcohol is more problematic addiction than crack cocaine.
|
Originally Posted by FL370esq
(Post 3931169)
Overseas?? Heck, it's pretty hard to file litigation in Canada and Sweden leans a bit more progressive than our neighbors to the north.
|
Originally Posted by METO Guido
(Post 3931128)
Excellent. Now take nine steps, heel-to-toe, along a straight line, turn on one foot and return nine steps in the opposite direction. A subject may be impaired if they:
|
Originally Posted by saltbae
(Post 3931163)
I would sue the brakes off that company that makes faulty equipment, the police for not properly calibrating the breathalyzer… there’s negligence there.. ruined her name and possibly career
|
Originally Posted by cencal83406
(Post 3931166)
Any particular reason you’d assume you can’t get compensated for a government action shown to have been harmful and incorrect?
Originally Posted by saltbae
(Post 3931168)
police departments paying millions in settlements every day to victims
All governments pretty much have qualified immunity in some form... the degree of that, and the remedies available to the subjects varies widely. With that said there is a growing movement to limit qualified immunity in the US, since it is generous enough to encourage a lot of abuse. |
Originally Posted by RedeyeWarrior
(Post 3931185)
You are foolish to even attempt the field sobriety test. It is not designed to prove sobriety. Better call Saul!
|
Originally Posted by RedeyeWarrior
(Post 3931185)
You are foolish to even attempt the field sobriety test. It is not designed to prove sobriety. Better call Saul!
|
Originally Posted by METO Guido
(Post 3930848)
Don’t they use some kind of sniffing device over there? One of the previous euro net perps blew well below US dui thresholds. Swedes are known to hit it pretty hard.
|
Originally Posted by RedeyeWarrior
(Post 3931185)
You are foolish to even attempt the field sobriety test. It is not designed to prove sobriety. Better call Saul!
|
Originally Posted by METO Guido
(Post 3931221)
Imo, yes. Roadside sobriety. Your nearest door to hims. Blow or refuse. No better $ spent than a cab from trouble. Worried about the new Lexus, have it towed. Saul bills at $400 an hour for asset nesting clients. Like you & me.
|
Originally Posted by Khantahr
(Post 3931229)
My brain hurts after trying to read that.
DUI defense firms typically have little objection representing clients with adequate ability to pay. Get a ride. |
Originally Posted by METO Guido
(Post 3931241)
Then a traffic stop or fender bender shouldn’t concern you cruising home from Pancho’s. Not to say there aren’t other routes to a hims eval. Domestic abuse complaint, slugfest with a neighbor, urinating in public, ER treatment as result of injuries/illness for dubious reasons. Disclosing symptomatic depression on form 8500-8.
DUI defense firms typically have little objection representing clients with adequate ability to pay. Get a ride. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3931193)
That's the fairly rare exception, not the rule. Qualified immunity tends to be the default and you have to prove otherwise.
All governments pretty much have qualified immunity in some form... the degree of that, and the remedies available to the subjects varies widely. With that said there is a growing movement to limit qualified immunity in the US, since it is generous enough to encourage a lot of abuse.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3931273)
It’s actually really simple. Don’t drink and drive. If you are addicted to alcohol you might not be able to not drink. Then you need HIMS.
https://youtu.be/8XC3Hc-rAkk?si=0cXhV_QVLCjLIQ65 |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:40 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands