![]() |
Originally Posted by MoonShot
(Post 1906185)
Well stated! Can't wait for part 2.
Carl |
Good analysis.
I also thought the same thing about 1E9. Why give one person so much power? Why wouldn't it be voted on by the entire MEC? Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1906195)
I agree but Ryan is going to be character assassinated for this. He's going to need emails and calls from CVG pilots that will stand strongly behind him against the certain recall attempts.
Carl |
Originally Posted by CVG767A
(Post 1906221)
He certainly has my support.
Carl |
Wrong thread. freaking so many of them now. makes me proud though.
|
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1906195)
I agree but Ryan is going to be character assassinated for this. He's going to need emails and calls from CVG pilots that will stand strongly behind him against the certain recall attempts.
Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1906227)
That is great to hear. If you feel like sharing your thoughts, are you a YES or NO on this?
Carl Well, here we are, in a time of record profits, being asked to approve a contract that is, in my opinion, concessionary! The raise is, once again, smaller than expected, but more significantly, we are making significant concessions in profit sharing, scope, and sick leave. In my correspondence with my reps (except for Ryan), the response seems to be that while this TA might be underwhelming, the alternative would be a drawn out mediation. WHO CARES?!? I'd rather live under C2012 than C2015. |
Originally Posted by CVG767A
(Post 1906356)
I'm an absolute NO on this one. I voted yes on C2012; it had lower pay increases than I wanted, but it fixed several other issues (notably sick leave). I figured that the short duration of the contract would position us well for this negotiation.
Well, here we are, in a time of record profits, being asked to approve a contract that is, in my opinion, concessionary! The raise is, once again, smaller than expected, but more significantly, we are making significant concessions in profit sharing, scope, and sick leave. In my correspondence with my reps (except for Ryan), the response seems to be that while this TA might be underwhelming, the alternative would be a drawn out mediation. WHO CARES?!? I'd rather live under C2012 than C2015. |
Originally Posted by Take Em
(Post 1906163)
Can we copy this and leave it in every airplane, crew room, bathroom, employee bus...? Seriously most people I speak with say NO, but we all know there is a going to be a huge number of yes men who are only looking at the measly pay bumps. Again the seniors will eat their youth and forget about how they ended up where they are now.
|
Originally Posted by CVG767A
(Post 1906356)
In my correspondence with my reps (except for Ryan), the response seems to be that while this TA might be underwhelming, the alternative would be a drawn out mediation. WHO CARES?!? I'd rather live under C2012 than C2015.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:42 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands