![]() |
Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
(Post 1916165)
True, but there are lines, and I am betting that some are being balanced on.
|
Originally Posted by orvil
(Post 1916148)
Considering the situation, I think the majority of us have shown admirable restraint. I know I have been very conscious of where the line is drawn.
On the other hand, we do have a right to freedom of speech. It's that inconvenient constitutional thingy. |
Originally Posted by Woofers
(Post 1916120)
Yes, but why feel the need to pass anything out at all? Seriously, do you think that your fellow co workers are so ignorant and stupid they can't figure anything out for themselves? Do they need your guiding light to help them through the process?
There is information EVERYWHERE. Pro, Con, from the union, not from the union, online, offline, etc. Y'all actually sound like a bunch of control freaks to me. But hey, whatever floats your boat. |
Hey guys, a quick note about the scare tactics posted by guys like sailingfun, hitimefurl, KnotSoFast, etc...there are no worries about speaking your mind on social media. The ONLY thing you need to refrain from is criticizing your employer. That's it. From what I've read, almost nobody is doing that. In fact, most are amazed at how adept our management was at winning.
The criticism on this is clear, and that is of our union leadership and their behavior. That is, and always will be, 100% protected speech and unquestioned by your employer. Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1916273)
Hey guys, a quick note about the scare tactics posted by guys like sailingfun, hitimefurl, KnotSoFast, etc...there are no worries about speaking your mind on social media. The ONLY thing you need to refrain from is criticizing your employer. That's it. From what I've read, almost nobody is doing that. In fact, most are amazed at how adept our management was at winning.
The criticism on this is clear, and that is of our union leadership and their behavior. That is, and always will be, 100% protected speech and unquestioned by your employer. Carl |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1916280)
Please show the post by me you are referencing?
Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1916290)
Post #22.
Carl |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1916292)
I referenced social media where in that post? The scare tactic was what in that post?
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1916179)
It's been consistently upheld in the courts that unions do not have the right to organize or promote other activities at company worksites or on the property.
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1916179)
Did the anti TA group ask for permission to use the lounges would be the first question to ask.
Carl |
sailing....you are wrong. the AFA was allowed all kinds of access to company property in the organizing effort at delta.
|
Originally Posted by orvil
(Post 1916148)
Considering the situation, I think the majority of us have shown admirable restraint. I know I have been very conscious of where the line is drawn.
On the other hand, we do have a right to freedom of speech. It's that inconvenient constitutional thingy. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:13 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands