Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Council 48 Update Quote >

Council 48 Update Quote

Search

Notices

Council 48 Update Quote

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-2015 | 07:02 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default Council 48 Update Quote

"We are hearing unofficial reports that senior company officers have stated the value won’t change much when we reengage, but they are willing to rearrange the deck chairs."


WE ARE PAYING $52 MILLION DOLLARS OF UNION DUES TO ALPA FOR THIS

No one is stupid enough to write something like this on purpose.

So what are their intentions??
Reply
Old 07-29-2015 | 07:09 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
"We are hearing unofficial reports that senior company officers have stated the value won’t change much when we reengage, but they are willing to rearrange the deck chairs."


WE ARE PAYING $52 MILLION DOLLARS OF UNION DUES TO ALPA FOR THIS

No one is stupid enough to write something like this on purpose.

So what are their intentions??

You also have pilots posting on here that "it was the concessions, not the money".
Reply
Old 07-29-2015 | 07:32 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 0
From: Power top
Default

I would think you could say, hey about $400m for China Eastern vs $450m and add 1% on the DC on 1/1/2016. Or did CE need that $450m for their pilot's retirement?

In other words, the productivity gains the company needs from us go to China Eastern, GOL, Skymark, XYZ. The retirement money you don't get from DAL goes to everyone under the sun.

Our beef isn't with the union, it's with our friend "Richard". Who calls their boss by his first name? Another charade.
Reply
Old 07-29-2015 | 08:16 AM
  #4  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by El10
You also have pilots posting on here that "it was the concessions, not the money".
I would think they baked that all in there. The way some yes voters explain it, they say they're willing to increase cost 2%, if you want an 8% pay raise we need staffing and scope concessions to make it fit a 2% budget and we will cost it out for you.
Reply
Old 07-29-2015 | 08:50 AM
  #5  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

80 Kts clmp...

Why is it again you don't support Mason's recall? What is he saying thats different from other recall subjects?
Reply
Old 07-29-2015 | 08:57 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 0
From: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Default

Originally Posted by El10
You also have pilots posting on here that "it was the concessions, not the money".
I've been guilty of that and appreciate you pointing that out. Mea culpa.

What I should've been saying is, "it's not just about the money" when addressing posts which are exclusively pointing at the money.
Reply
Old 07-29-2015 | 10:31 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 169
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
"We are hearing unofficial reports that senior company officers have stated the value won’t change much when we reengage, but they are willing to rearrange the deck chairs."


WE ARE PAYING $52 MILLION DOLLARS OF UNION DUES TO ALPA FOR THIS

No one is stupid enough to write something like this on purpose.

So what are their intentions??
Don't fight it. Call their bluff.

I originally said take 1.0B and put it all into pay only, no other changes or concessions. That would be a 100M gift back to the company, although we should ask for that to go to charity to make it even harder for them to say no.

We get a TA that avoids ALL the concessions and adds (according to sailingfun's numbers, which I believe to be roughly correct) 19.5% over 3 years, without any changes to PS. We can then offer them the same 6% PS trade and get 6% on top of that, for a far greater TVM raise than POS15 had including the PS trade, all without any concessions.

If they say that, we call their bluff.
Reply
Old 07-29-2015 | 04:34 PM
  #8  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
"We are hearing unofficial reports that senior company officers have stated the value won’t change much when we reengage, but they are willing to rearrange the deck chairs."


WE ARE PAYING $52 MILLION DOLLARS OF UNION DUES TO ALPA FOR THIS

No one is stupid enough to write something like this on purpose.

So what are their intentions??
This is where Gloopy's plan comes into play.
Reply
Old 07-29-2015 | 04:49 PM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Don't fight it. Call their bluff.

I originally said take 1.0B and put it all into pay only, no other changes or concessions. That would be a 100M gift back to the company, although we should ask for that to go to charity to make it even harder for them to say no.

We get a TA that avoids ALL the concessions and adds (according to sailingfun's numbers, which I believe to be roughly correct) 19.5% over 3 years, without any changes to PS. We can then offer them the same 6% PS trade and get 6% on top of that, for a far greater TVM raise than POS15 had including the PS trade, all without any concessions.

If they say that, we call their bluff.
Love your plan.

Just my opinion, whether they do it on purpose or not the concessions are vastly undervalued.

Just one of many points, hiring going forward with TA, 50/month.

Hiring now that we rejected TA, 110-120/month.

This is the reality of the Shadow MEC doing the jobs math.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gzsg
Delta
56
07-10-2015 01:55 AM
iceman49
Delta
35
06-30-2015 02:35 PM
APC225
United
17
10-31-2012 06:12 AM
SoCalGuy
United
41
09-26-2012 06:53 PM
Redeye Pilot
United
42
11-07-2010 12:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices