Side letters?
#1
Straight QOL, homie
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Side letters?
I have heard that the company is trying to pick off a few or their wants (and OUR leverage) via side letters outside of section 6.
It would obviously be a colossal blunder to dilute our leverage this way. Look how the AF/KLM settlement worked.
Has the NC officially resigned, or can they still negotiate?
I sure hope the MD11 doesn't try anything like this.
It would obviously be a colossal blunder to dilute our leverage this way. Look how the AF/KLM settlement worked.
Has the NC officially resigned, or can they still negotiate?
I sure hope the MD11 doesn't try anything like this.
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
#3
I was concerned about this happening after the TA was turned down. At this point, any activity like that would have to be DFR material...either individually or as a group.
#4
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 394
I have heard that the company is trying to pick off a few or their wants (and OUR leverage) via side letters outside of section 6.
It would obviously be a colossal blunder to dilute our leverage this way. Look how the AF/KLM settlement worked.
Has the NC officially resigned, or can they still negotiate?
I sure hope the MD11 doesn't try anything like this.
It would obviously be a colossal blunder to dilute our leverage this way. Look how the AF/KLM settlement worked.
Has the NC officially resigned, or can they still negotiate?
I sure hope the MD11 doesn't try anything like this.
#7
Straight QOL, homie
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
I,too, heard the company wants to complete a side letter for 190s, possibly in conjunction with the meeting in SLC.
Why would we allow management to peel off our leverage? I seriously hope dalpa lame duck leadership won't do this. But I also have no doubt they'd love to "teach us a lesson" for slapping them down.
Why would we allow management to peel off our leverage? I seriously hope dalpa lame duck leadership won't do this. But I also have no doubt they'd love to "teach us a lesson" for slapping them down.
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
I have heard that the company is trying to pick off a few or their wants (and OUR leverage) via side letters outside of section 6.
It would obviously be a colossal blunder to dilute our leverage this way. Look how the AF/KLM settlement worked.
Has the NC officially resigned, or can they still negotiate?
I sure hope the MD11 doesn't try anything like this.
It would obviously be a colossal blunder to dilute our leverage this way. Look how the AF/KLM settlement worked.
Has the NC officially resigned, or can they still negotiate?
I sure hope the MD11 doesn't try anything like this.
#9
Runs with scissors
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,723
I,too, heard the company wants to complete a side letter for 190s, possibly in conjunction with the meeting in SLC.
Why would we allow management to peel off our leverage? I seriously hope dalpa lame duck leadership won't do this. But I also have no doubt they'd love to "teach us a lesson" for slapping them down.
Why would we allow management to peel off our leverage? I seriously hope dalpa lame duck leadership won't do this. But I also have no doubt they'd love to "teach us a lesson" for slapping them down.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post