Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
RA on Dueling PS Plans and E-190's >

RA on Dueling PS Plans and E-190's

Search

Notices

RA on Dueling PS Plans and E-190's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2015 | 04:41 PM
  #61  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
I

I don't think this was a particularly effective carrot, as I said, although I'd be more interested in anything that adds to mainline flying, and improves the ratios. The ratios in the defunct TA can be discussed if/when we get another deal, but for now, it's useless.
We're about to exceed the 1.81 ratio as is. If we were to add these jets and they were all growth the ML fleet the increase would be unprotected even with TA2015.

The ratios are way too low. Want proof, isn't all the flying we're doing now because of C2012? All these 717s? So, I take it we're barely just keeping up with the minimum, right? Because if we are far exceeding the minimum then what good was the ratio for requiring growth?
Reply
Old 10-17-2015 | 04:49 PM
  #62  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Sink, as to the aircraft, nobody is crying over a loss of used E190s and 739s in exchange for 3 big concessions. I don't believe the company requires concessions from the mechanics to buy tools and flight attendants to buy used galley carts, but for some reason we buy into we need to give up something to get the company to buy jets that the company says it needs. Buying assets whether as replacement or growth is a normal business function and completely affordable for a company making $6B a year in profit.

That should have been a nonstarter with the NC, not a "that's a great idea" means to get a TA passed early.

Again don't blame the company for trying, blame the former union leadership for signing off on it and promoting it and threatening repercussions over it.
Reply
Old 10-18-2015 | 03:48 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid

Now some heads will pop around here at the notion of the 190 replacing the 88 because any 88 replacement is going to have to be equal in size they would say. But I looked on my icrew max and counted the turns I do out of ATL and saw out of 62 of them, 22 were new 717 flying, the rest were 88 destinations. Many of those 88 destinations were full just about every time. The 717 comes in about 26% smaller, what's to stop them from using something 34% smaller?
I have always assumed the 88 was next on the chopping block for the following:

It did not get the updated cockpit
The E-Jets can fly at least x2 at the same cost
The 88 is approaching 30 years old
Management is always talking about how long it will be around <-- That being the dead giveaway.
Reply
Old 10-18-2015 | 03:50 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Sink, as to the aircraft, nobody is crying over a loss of used E190s and 739s in exchange for 3 big concessions. I don't believe the company requires concessions from the mechanics to buy tools and flight attendants to buy used galley carts, but for some reason we buy into we need to give up something to get the company to buy jets that the company says it needs. Buying assets whether as replacement or growth is a normal business function and completely affordable for a company making $6B a year in profit.
Following this logic who funded the alterations to shrink the galleys?
Reply
Old 10-18-2015 | 04:43 AM
  #65  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
NewK,

Anyway, I tend to agree with FTB about the 190. It's the md88 replacement at a lower pay rate ... Which is already lower than smaller airframes.
Please recall we have a scope section. In the case of the E190, it drove an increasing Mainline domestic to DCI block hour ratio which was nearly twice what an E190 could fly. In fact, that ratio for 50 E190's equalled 40 737-900 (because of the 737's higher - fly all night - utilization).

Whether the increasing ratio protected 737 growth, or simply took the surplus out of the current ratio, the effect was to protect more mainline flying.
Reply
Old 10-18-2015 | 08:55 AM
  #66  
qball's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 1
From: Cockpit speaker volume knob set to eleven.
Default

Originally Posted by 300SMK
Following this logic who funded the alterations to shrink the galleys?
The same ones that refurbished the 744 and then parked them.
Reply
Old 10-18-2015 | 09:24 AM
  #67  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Please recall we have a scope section. In the case of the E190, it drove an increasing Mainline domestic to DCI block hour ratio which was nearly twice what an E190 could fly. In fact, that ratio for 50 E190's equalled 40 737-900 (because of the 737's higher - fly all night - utilization).

Whether the increasing ratio protected 737 growth, or simply took the surplus out of the current ratio, the effect was to protect more mainline flying.
What happened to UA jumping right on those 190s?
Reply
Old 10-18-2015 | 10:13 AM
  #68  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Please recall we have a scope section.
Yep. How is that working out for us with the AF/KLM JV?
We got rolled for a few bucks a month. I assume you were involved in that grievance settlement. You were certainly involved in spinning it. Pathetic.
Reply
Old 10-18-2015 | 01:13 PM
  #69  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,252
Likes: 95
From: DAL 330
Default Canceled orders?

Guys,

No aircraft orders have been canceled. Mr. Anderson said that they "would" be cancelled, and they might very well get cancelled but until we eventually reach a deal no one knows how this will turn out.

The orders could be cancelled forever. They could be cancelled and re-ordered with TA-2. Maybe they will not be cancelled.

To all the Pilots who are fretting about cancelled aircraft orders I would counsel you to relax.............. things change.

Mr. Anderson did say the orders "will" be cancelled but so what? He also said he did not come to Delta to oversee a merger, guess what? We merged nonetheless. Things change.

Scoop - Just my 2 cents

Last edited by Scoop; 10-18-2015 at 01:48 PM.
Reply
Old 10-18-2015 | 02:48 PM
  #70  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,215
Likes: 658
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Originally Posted by 300SMK
Following this logic who funded the alterations to shrink the galleys?
That's all about the FAs organization drive. Say you are changing the seat configuration for flight attendants and buy some goodwill after the pay raise. On CNBC Richard Anderson said it was a seat pitch improvement for product enhancement that had added more room to the galley.

Last edited by notEnuf; 10-18-2015 at 03:14 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWRflyr
United
5
08-02-2013 07:26 AM
shoelu
Major
24
12-21-2011 12:20 PM
angry tanker
Cargo
91
03-08-2007 08:56 AM
SkyHigh
Major
0
12-16-2005 05:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices