Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Checklists at Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/91767-checklists-delta.html)

Rudder 11-19-2015 09:42 AM

Problem is that we are all busting our rear ends trying to save precious $$'s for the company and they take that savings and invest in other airlines that threaten our jobs.

Keep that backpack on grasshopper!!

TenYearsGone 11-19-2015 12:44 PM


Originally Posted by Rudder (Post 2013641)
Problem is that we are all busting our rear ends trying to save precious $$'s for the company and they take that savings and invest in other airlines that threaten our jobs.

Keep that backpack on grasshopper!!

Another eyeopening event is the insider stock sales!!:eek: Look at how rich the 13 year veteran Joanne Smith is...I think she basically babysits HR, former FA. Again, I do not begrudge management pay, but enuff is enuff.

These people are raking it in, while neglecting and reducing our payback.

TEN

forgot to bid 11-19-2015 01:12 PM


Originally Posted by MDPilot (Post 2013554)
FTB, you're good at that kind of stuff, just the person to do that. Waiting patiently on the supporting graphs, charts, and PPT:D

Well, they lost $2B in Q4 2014. There are 31,556,926 seconds per year.

So basically, they lost $63 / sec.

Is that right?

How many lbs of fuel does the 320 save with this abnormal flap configuration for landing? Are you showing more chord on the tires? How much does a tire cost btw?

EMBFlyer 11-19-2015 02:45 PM

USAir has been pushing Flaps 3 for years on the Airbus. They say it lowers the risk of tail strikes. You can land at 3 or Full, but if you whack the tail and you landed Flaps Full, I can guarantee you'll making a trip to the big brown desk.

Having said that, the 321 lands better with Flaps 3.

Post merger, the company said our preferred Flap Setting for the 757/767 is 25. Boeing says the risk of a tail strike is higher at 25.

scambo1 11-19-2015 02:45 PM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 2013720)
Well, they lost $2B in Q4 2014. There are 31,556,926 seconds per year.

So basically, they lost $63 / sec.

Is that right?

How many lbs of fuel does the 320 save with this abnormal flap configuration for landing? Are you showing more chord on the tires? How much does a tire cost btw?

So in that quarter, they lost $252/second. Those are some expensive seconds.

Blackwing 11-19-2015 03:02 PM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 2013519)
That said, real world me, realizes you will have a better FO if you keep them in their comfort zone and routine. Do that and less mistakes will be made. There may be a better way to do things, like my way, but it might not be the cultural norm the FO is used to and the FO has their show to run too.

Bravo. This should be mandatory reading for captains. Way too many have a tendency to push (especially newer) FOs off their game without realizing the detriment to the operation it's causing.

badflaps 11-19-2015 04:12 PM


Originally Posted by Blackwing (Post 2013762)
Bravo. This should be mandatory reading for captains. Way too many have a tendency to push (especially newer) FOs off their game without realizing the detriment to the operation it's causing.

Take the runway with the flaps up a couple of times, that'll straighten things out. Always worked for me on the "9".

Hank Kingsley 11-19-2015 04:55 PM

No use rushing anything in aviation. Especially between pushback and V1.

Justdoinmyjob 11-19-2015 05:02 PM


Originally Posted by Hank Kingsley (Post 2013814)
No use rushing anything in aviation. Especially between pushback and V1.

Considering we get paid by the second, my motto is "Start off slow, and then taper off."

80ktsClamp 11-19-2015 05:44 PM

The paper WDR is going away... it'll all be uplink. That will reduce the workload!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:44 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands