DAL once again flagrantly violates contract
#12
I'm a little fuzzy on this thread. In my world, there's only one thing better than going to work to fly a great trip . . .
.
Staying home and getting paid for that great trip with no recovery obligation!
.
What's with all the angst here?? I am going to go on the record here and say that I will pre-approve the company buying ANY of my future trips as long as I get to stay home with no recovery flying.
.
You guys are complaining about a non-issue here!!!
.
.
Staying home and getting paid for that great trip with no recovery obligation!
.
What's with all the angst here?? I am going to go on the record here and say that I will pre-approve the company buying ANY of my future trips as long as I get to stay home with no recovery flying.
.
You guys are complaining about a non-issue here!!!
.
#13
I'm a little fuzzy on this thread. In my world, there's only one thing better than going to work to fly a great trip . . .
.
Staying home and getting paid for that great trip with no recovery obligation!
.
What's with all the angst here?? I am going to go on the record here and say that I will pre-approve the company buying ANY of my future trips as long as I get to stay home with no recovery flying.
.
You guys are complaining about a non-issue here!!!
.
.
Staying home and getting paid for that great trip with no recovery obligation!
.
What's with all the angst here?? I am going to go on the record here and say that I will pre-approve the company buying ANY of my future trips as long as I get to stay home with no recovery flying.
.
You guys are complaining about a non-issue here!!!
.
The fact that somebody in management thinks this is somehow OK is the point.
The double-talk is the point.
"We just can't make money on shorter high credit trips"
"More 4 day trips in Atlanta and reduced credit"
Then a custom built boondoggle for the favored few that has zero regard for efficiency or cost.
Rules of the Road for the drones, favors for the elite.
I hope you misread the original post, otherwise I'm a little fuzzy how you could think differently.
#15
I see this 1 of 2 ways:
1. This trip requires management. Trip should have went out via open time and then the company should have bought the trip.
2. This trip does not require management.
Either way they went about assigning it the wrong way. It is bigger than 1 trip, from my lowly line pilot perspective there are 2 sets of rules.
#17
I hope it's not as bad as I think, I really liked the guy who gave me my type ride: big picture, very personable, and I thought his focus was in all the right areas. For all I know, the individual pilots weren't even aware of the details of the flight. They could've just been handed the trip by their boss and told to fly it. The trip in it's original form could be legit and the company just decided to pay out because it looks bad. Perception is reality, and on the surface this looks like elite favoritism. My frustration with DAL isn't about 1 trip or 2 pilots, this particular example from my frame of reference just epitomizes a very sore subject with me, both at the company and this country at-large.
We are working for a company that sells rules of the road, but the money grubbers at the top epitomize exactly the opposite. I could be dead wrong about this trip but my premise doesn't change. If you're so concerned, you can call the pilot too and set the record straight. Heck, maybe you ARE the pilot and want me to call you
. My brain hurts, I'm done defending my action and/or lack thereof.
#20
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Unknown
Mike, my point to all this is, I believe your thread topic is a bit over the top on this one. The contract allows the company to buy trips for admin/lca types and pay protects the pilots who would have flown the trip.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



