I like the Canabus. It is easy to fly and has some really cool toys(great screens, electronic checklist etc). The cockpit is also MUCH nicer than the 737. I hope to have a sidestick for the rest of my career!!
Now, it is not in any way perfect. It’s twitchy and generates EICAS messages like crazy. Also, there are things that they just didn’t take time to do right(VNAV descent, tray table, autothrottle, etc). On the whole though, I like the jet. |
Originally Posted by C5Drvr
(Post 2936966)
Is the 220 QOL that much better than the 73 to justify the pay difference?
Seniority progression will be faster on the 220 but the trips still don't have much variety (you'll be doing the same 9 or 10 overnights every trip). You have to decide what's more important to you. |
Originally Posted by RJ4LIFE
(Post 2937396)
Not sure if they still do this but they used to give new hires access to deltanet a few weeks before class started. If they do, I'd suggest taking a look at the various bid packages to see what the trips look like on different fleets, and then look at the wide reports to see what kinds of lines junior pilots are getting. This will give you some idea how long it will take to get off reserve, hold weekends off, hold both-end commutable trips, etc.
Seniority progression will be faster on the 220 but the trips still don't have much variety (you'll be doing the same 9 or 10 overnights every trip). You have to decide what's more important to you. |
Originally Posted by The Localizer
(Post 2937484)
For now, but overnights and qol will continue to increase when we have 90 plus aircraft vs 25
|
Originally Posted by PilotJ3
(Post 2937573)
Yeah, that’s what I said when we started to grow the 321. The opposite has happened. Lol
|
Originally Posted by Extenda
(Post 2937586)
320 is great if you like Austin/Boston/Florida!
|
Originally Posted by The Localizer
(Post 2937484)
For now, but overnights and qol will continue to increase when we have 90 plus aircraft vs 25
|
Originally Posted by Extenda
(Post 2937586)
320 is great if you like Austin/Boston/Florida!
Anything a 737-900 or 321 can do the neo can do 19 more passengers and 20 percent less fuel It also burns less than a 757 we know it doesn’t have the runway performance a 757 does but nothing does so might as well have something that can do everything else |
Originally Posted by The Localizer
(Post 2937865)
That’s for now, but there are also west coast layovers that increase every month, plus when the neo comes the variety of flying will greatly increase. Initially only Hawaii but a lot of trans cons, carribean, Latin America, possibly Alaska. Possibly South America
Anything a 737-900 or 321 can do the neo can do 19 more passengers and 20 percent less fuel It also burns less than a 757 we know it doesn’t have the runway performance a 757 does but nothing does so might as well have something that can do everything else |
Originally Posted by The Localizer
(Post 2937484)
For now, but overnights and qol will continue to increase when we have 90 plus aircraft vs 25
Originally Posted by PilotJ3
(Post 2937573)
Yeah, that’s what I said when we started to grow the 321. The opposite has happened. Lol
Originally Posted by Extenda
(Post 2937586)
320 is great if you like Austin/Boston/Florida!
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:22 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands