|
Found This
An old NN from a different airline stating that the NC didn't feel the changes to scope would result in a reduction of Mainline flying. Within weeks of the TA passing, mainline flying was reduced to the exact minimum of the TA.
|
Originally Posted by boog123
(Post 2237268)
An old NN from a different airline stating that the NC didn't feel the changes to scope would result in a reduction of Mainline flying. Within weeks of the TA passing, mainline flying was reduced to the exact minimum of the TA.
|
Originally Posted by badflaps
(Post 2237375)
Ya, but by now everybody has "We didn't think they'd do that" embroided on their pillow cases, right?
|
Originally Posted by boog123
(Post 2237268)
An old NN from a different airline stating that the NC didn't feel the changes to scope would result in a reduction of Mainline flying. Within weeks of the TA passing, mainline flying was reduced to the exact minimum of the TA.
|
Originally Posted by boog123
(Post 2237268)
An old NN from a different airline stating that the NC didn't feel the changes to scope would result in a reduction of Mainline flying. Within weeks of the TA passing, mainline flying was reduced to the exact minimum of the TA.
|
Originally Posted by boog123
(Post 2237268)
An old NN from a different airline stating that the NC didn't feel the changes to scope would result in a reduction of Mainline flying. Within weeks of the TA passing, mainline flying was reduced to the exact minimum of the TA.
|
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 2237508)
What airline? Let's see it.
|
Originally Posted by Hank Kingsley
(Post 2237580)
How does that even remotely apply here? We have more protection than before.
|
Boog, then vote no. There are no assurances in life. This "sky is falling" mentality if we vote yes is incredible. You new guys and gals, I hear this doom and gloom every contract.
|
No voting may be congenital.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:15 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands