Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Endeavor Air (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/endeavor-air/)
-   -   Endeavor Conference Call (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/endeavor-air/81481-endeavor-conference-call.html)

tom14cat14 05-13-2014 06:17 PM


Originally Posted by Kforekyle (Post 1642536)
The company does not want to lose any more pilots. They know most of those downgrades would probably leave. A good move if you ask me. They need to give the other downgrades the same deal. As an Fo, If I don't see an substantial increase in pay in the next two week, I will put my two weeks in

If they dont want more of us to leave I think they need to show hope for FO's. I think last nights call will mean another wave of FO's that abandon ship.

Onedayatatimee 05-13-2014 06:32 PM

This is just my speculation I have no facts to back it up. Feel free to add to it or tear it down.

I haven't really heard anyone mention this on here but you think there is a chance they want the first officers to quit?? Everyone seems to be in denial of what LOA 50 is designed to do. There is a couple reasons for pay protecting pilots starting around the 1200# seniority number.

I keep hearing repeatedly on this forum "if I don't get a raise soon I'm gone, or if they don't make it a fair playing field for all the pilots I'm out of here". Do the Math on the fleet numbers. They will have to many pilots after the summer flying. They even said in the conference call by early next year down to 38 +81 airframes (1200 pilots, we have around 1900 right now). You can't tell me those 38 200's are even a safe number. They want this company to eventually be a CRJ900 operation.

The LOA 50 was designed to make sure captains (go to NYC vs displacing to FO to avoid commute to NYC). They want to make sure displaced CR2 captains going to LGA/JFK are seniority order displaced 200 captains that only need differences (3week footprint) training vs initial upgrades who need the full course (2month footprint) for the rapid expansion in NYC.

After that it's designed to make sure they have first officers to staff the LGA/JFK 900 operation as the company shrinks down and parks the CR2.

And unfortunately and rightfully so it has upset all the first officers to the point that a lot are going to quit. Which based on projected fleet numbers I feel they want more guys quitting. They don't care about staffing the 200. If to many quit they will just park the rest of the 200's. With this LOA they will have plenty of guys sticking around to fly the right seat of the 900 for $70-$85hr.

I'm speculating once again. Hope I'm wrong.

Bucking Bar 05-13-2014 07:15 PM

Onedayatatime,

Your post is logical.

You probably over estimate Delta's ability to strategically manage an express carrier. One of my favorite lines from an article about Comair's demise was ... "Comair was a multi billion dollar company which returned outstanding value to shareholders, then Delta bought them." It is true. ASA was the most profitable airline, on a percentage basis, on Earth. Then Delta bought them.

Delta puts good Delta managers in charge. Pays nobody anything and usually retains some very poor middle management (have no idea how Endeavor runs, but this is the pattern). The express carrier is expected to operate with nearly no budget to run the thing and Delta assumes that whatever works at Delta should work at the express carrier, although the express carrier has none of the infrastructure in place to make it happen. Then Delta wrecks efficiency by overflying different carriers so that 4 CRJ's parked next to each other can't be flown by another airline's crews, or repaired by their mechanics. The 4 similar airplanes are for scheduling and maintenance, difference types all together. This drives reductions in utilization and increases in costs via the conflicting parasitic groups required to manage separate certificates.

So yes, it could be a grand plan. Or it could be (and looks like) the way things have always been done.

Past V1 05-13-2014 07:18 PM


Originally Posted by Onedayatatimee (Post 1642565)
This is just my speculation I have no facts to back it up. Feel free to add to it or tear it down.

I haven't really heard anyone mention this on here but you think there is a chance they want the first officers to quit?? Everyone seems to be in denial of what LOA 50 is designed to do. There is a couple reasons for pay protecting pilots starting around the 1200# seniority number.

I keep hearing repeatedly on this forum "if I don't get a raise soon I'm gone, or if they don't make it a fair playing field for all the pilots I'm out of here". Do the Math on the fleet numbers. They will have to many pilots after the summer flying. They even said in the conference call by early next year down to 38 +81 airframes (1200 pilots, we have around 1900 right now). You can't tell me those 38 200's are even a safe number. They want this company to eventually be a CRJ900 operation.

The LOA 50 was designed to make sure captains (go to NYC vs displacing to FO to avoid commute to NYC). They want to make sure displaced CR2 captains going to LGA/JFK are seniority order displaced 200 captains that only need differences (3week footprint) training vs initial upgrades who need the full course (2month footprint) for the rapid expansion in NYC.

After that it's designed to make sure they have first officers to staff the LGA/JFK 900 operation as the company shrinks down and parks the CR2.

And unfortunately and rightfully so it has upset all the first officers to the point that a lot are going to quit. Which based on projected fleet numbers I feel they want more guys quitting. They don't care about staffing the 200. If to many quit they will just park the rest of the 200's. With this LOA they will have plenty of guys sticking around to fly the right seat of the 900 for $70-$85hr.

I'm speculating once again. Hope I'm wrong.

I can agree with this speculation. Although I think you missed a major point about FO's "quitting". You see, an employer would be subject to paying massive unemployment insurance premiums if they had to furlough all the pilots. If the pilots quit...then the company would not be subject to these increased premiums. Saving the company tons of money.

If their goal is to park all 200's, the cheapest course of action is to make life miserable to have FO's quit and the rate they need. Then train CA's in differences training and cash in the savings as they expand their NYC operations.

Brilliant way to reduce your workforce, profit and expand operations. I don't think there is a way to battle this. They win either way...if they hire = cheap labor...if they shrink = cheap reduction.

Nantonaku 05-13-2014 07:44 PM


Originally Posted by Past V1 (Post 1642610)
I can agree with this speculation. Although I think you missed a major point about FO's "quitting". You see, an employer would be subject to paying massive unemployment insurance premiums if they had to furlough all the pilots. If the pilots quit...then the company would not be subject to these increased premiums. Saving the company tons of money.

If their goal is to park all 200's, the cheapest course of action is to make life miserable to have FO's quit and the rate they need. Then train CA's in differences training and cash in the savings as they expand their NYC operations.

Brilliant way to reduce your workforce, profit and expand operations. I don't think there is a way to battle this. They win either way...if they hire = cheap labor...if they shrink = cheap reduction.

The problem is now keeping the 900's staffed in 2015. They will have to do something eventually or the precious 900's won't fly in their all important NY market. They will have to come up with something this winter or it will be too late.

jethikoki 05-14-2014 01:16 AM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 1642607)
Onedayatatime,

Your post is logical.

You probably over estimate Delta's ability to strategically manage an express carrier. One of my favorite lines from an article about Comair's demise was ... "Comair was a multi billion dollar company which returned outstanding value to shareholders, then Delta bought them." It is true. ASA was the most profitable airline, on a percentage basis, on Earth. Then Delta bought them.

Delta puts good Delta managers in charge. Pays nobody anything and usually retains some very poor middle management (have no idea how Endeavor runs, but this is the pattern). The express carrier is expected to operate with nearly no budget to run the thing and Delta assumes that whatever works at Delta should work at the express carrier, although the express carrier has none of the infrastructure in place to make it happen. Then Delta wrecks efficiency by overflying different carriers so that 4 CRJ's parked next to each other can't be flown by another airline's crews, or repaired by their mechanics. The 4 similar airplanes are for scheduling and maintenance, difference types all together. This drives reductions in utilization and increases in costs via the conflicting parasitic groups required to manage separate certificates.

So yes, it could be a grand plan. Or it could be (and looks like) the way things have always been done.

Well said Bar!

Tinpusher007 05-14-2014 02:58 AM

The problem with the above speculation is that they are pay protecting those downgraded captains until they upgrade again (according to LOA 50). So where is the savings there? Thats not even increased fo wages, its having fos on captain pay. I wouldnt be at all surprised if they wind up keeping those guys on captain pay MUCH longer than just the middle of next year. Their ability to "anticipate" has left much to be desired by their own admission. The other thing is that attrition is still coming off the top of the list; and in higher numbers than the bottom most recently. This will require hiring. If they cant hire now, they certainly wont be able to after even more fos leave.

I cant believe DL mgt would allow such a liability to their NYC operation. LGA slots are a hot commodity. If they wind up routinely cancelling flights due to staffing issues I could see other airlines making a lot of noise about it.

Avroman 05-14-2014 03:24 AM


Originally Posted by Tinpusher007 (Post 1642678)
The problem with the above speculation is that they are pay protecting those downgraded captains until they upgrade again (according to LOA 50). So where is the savings there? Thats not even increased fo wages, its having fos on captain pay. I wouldnt be at all surprised if they wind up keeping those guys on captain pay MUCH longer than just the middle of next year. Their ability to "anticipate" has left much to be desired by their own admission. The other thing is that attrition is still coming off the top of the list; and in higher numbers than the bottom most recently. This will require hiring. If they cant hire now, they certainly wont be able to after even more fos leave.

I cant believe DL mgt would allow such a liability to their NYC operation. LGA slots are a hot commodity. If they wind up routinely cancelling flights due to staffing issues I could see other airlines making a lot of noise about it.

I'd bet my next paycheck, Delta would shift B-717's in those slots rather than let them go. They'd give up flights in MSP and DTW first.

Tinpusher007 05-14-2014 03:41 AM


Originally Posted by Avroman (Post 1642687)
I'd bet my next paycheck, Delta would shift B-717's in those slots rather than let them go. They'd give up flights in MSP and DTW first.

That will work for some of the larger markets we fly out LGA, but not all of them. Besides DL doesnt have direct control of the delivery of those aircraft and only has a handful now. Dont forget about JFK too. Im just sayin...

Captain Tony 05-14-2014 04:39 AM


Originally Posted by Avroman (Post 1642687)
I'd bet my next paycheck, Delta would shift B-717's in those slots rather than let them go. They'd give up flights in MSP and DTW first.

ExpressJet (ASA) is currently covering flying in LGA and DTW that both Endeavor and GoJets can't perform. It's month to month and has been going on for quire a while. And believe me, we can't wait for you guys to take back LGA. Rumors are an ASA CR2 base in DTW with CR2 CPA extensions in very soon.

spaaks 05-14-2014 05:26 AM

Bendover paying two CA's wouldn't be any cheaper than any other regional, so where's the benefit to delta? Basically negates the concessions they got from you

Waitingformins 05-14-2014 07:45 AM


Originally Posted by Captain Tony (Post 1642708)
ExpressJet (ASA) is currently covering flying in LGA and DTW that both Endeavor and GoJets can't perform. It's month to month and has been going on for quire a while. And believe me, we can't wait for you guys to take back LGA. Rumors are an ASA CR2 base in DTW with CR2 CPA extensions in very soon.

How can you say this, if you believe what you say in the other forums? You’re upset with getting more work? Isn’t your contract better than Go-jet and Endeavor? Aren’t their street captains at Go-jets and pay protected captains at Endeavor? Don’t you think an extended CPA would be at higher rates with Delta? You think ASA would risk their staffing at DFW and IAD with other customers if there wasn’t any profitable incentive for this flying. Wouldn’t you rather see you’re companies financials improve through growth or labor cuts?

MrMustache 05-14-2014 08:06 AM


Originally Posted by Catboatsailor (Post 1642790)
.

5)Respect We are not a subcontractor. For all intensive purposes, we are Delta employees.

http://www.x-entertainment.com/pics/kool1.jpg

INTENTS AND PURPOSES


INTENTS!

Yumyum 05-14-2014 06:53 PM

My prediction...kill this colgan pinnacle parasite .

Yumyum 05-14-2014 06:54 PM

No seniority handouts. Time to vanish!

cencal83406 05-15-2014 02:42 AM


Originally Posted by Yumyum (Post 1643399)
My prediction...kill this colgan mesaba pinnacle parasite .

Fify

;10char

Captain Tony 05-15-2014 03:41 AM

Delta will never give you S3 travel bennies back because junior Delta employees and other Connection employees will stop showing up for work. Literally.

Justdoinmyjob 05-15-2014 03:59 AM

@catboatsailor,
Are you suggesting that Endeavor pilots going to work get priority over mainline pilots on a mainline Jumpseat? Whatever priority you guys figure out on your own metal has no bearing on the mainline pilots. Why would you say the DAL pilots would never go for it, unless you meant on mainline jumpseats? If that's the case, then yeah, that dog ain't never gonna hunt.

Duke990 05-15-2014 04:11 AM

Delta's fleet plan for 9E was set with the Delta pilot contract and 9E's bankruptcy. That pilot contract REQUIRES Delta to have no more than 125 50-seat jets in operation by the end of 2015. They have also said many times before that they would prefer no more than 100 50-seaters by that time.

I was also jumpseating on AirTran recently and those pilots told me the AirTran name and all 717's will be gone by the end of 2014, even if the transition to DL isn't complete yet.

This tells me that DL will have all 717's online by mid 2015 at the latest, and if they can't staff the 50-seat jets, who cares! The 717's were bought to replace most of that flying anyway. 9E is just trying to stop the bleeding until next year. After that, they will only need to staff 81 CRJ-900's.

Razor 05-15-2014 04:41 AM


Originally Posted by Catboatsailor (Post 1642790)
For all intensive purposes, we are Delta employees.

No you're not. You're outsourced labor who's purpose is to be whipsawed against other outsourced labor providers to provide service at the lowest cost.

Does your ID say Delta Air Lines on it? No, you're not a Delta employee.


Originally Posted by Catboatsailor (Post 1642790)
The end result of the SSP has not matched the road show presentations. 38% rate for Conditional Job Offers turned a fantastic PR opportunity into a nightmare. Captains who have been turned down feel disrespected.

The captains that have been turned down have no one to blame but themselves. Delta will deplete their pool in July. There's a job for everyone that interviews and it's theirs to lose. Get the interview prep, get prepared and get the job.

AlaskaBound 05-15-2014 05:36 AM


Originally Posted by Catboatsailor (Post 1643574)
Even worse, we are in-sourced labor set up to whip shaw outsourced labor. We have the economy of scale using Delta's logistical structure and our terrible concessionary contract to boot. If Delta had this set up in 95-08, they would of had the upper hand. But our pilot shortage would be even worse right now. Yes it says Delta on the Badge, KCM screws it up all the time, because of it. That's meaningless though, look at the personal running the day to day aspects of the company. It's Delta employees "brought" in to run Endeavor.

From a business standpoint standpoint I disagree, we are one company. Take the emotion out of it. Look at the money and staffing progression.

I'm not debating who is to blame, for not being hired by Delta. I'm simply stating the SSP has become a thorn in the side of the company. If Delta wants to attract qualified pilots to staff both the 200 and 900, the SSP will have to be changed. I believe it financially advantageous FOR Delta to return the flow thru. Our goal was to hire 400 pilots this year. We have less than 50 since January. Given our attrition, I predict in five years Delta will be forced to part off the 900 aircraft to multiple regionals. They will not see a return on their investment. If Envoy had approved their contract we would of seen a mass exodus of our FO's going to them. Delta got lucky. Given our current status, when Republic gets their contract to an acceptable level, you will see a higher attrition rate of our pilots to them and other regionals. Bottom line if we liquidate it will affect all Delta Mainline pilots profit sharing. That's a small amount but realize it demonstrates how closely we are tied together.

Maybe Delta's return on their investment is coming in other ways not obvious to us. If Delta gets what it wants from the purchase of 9E at the end of the day (and that may not be to continue to operate) then they've won. Delta could be using 9E soley as a whipsaw tool to force the other DCI carriers to lower their rates, among other things. We may not be seeing what he bean counters in ATL see. Delta is ruthless and will do anything to make a buck. Especially with DCI. We're all disposable.

Captain Tony 05-15-2014 06:49 AM


Originally Posted by Catboatsailor (Post 1643574)
Even worse, we are in-sourced labor set up to whip shaw outsourced labor. We have the economy of scale using Delta's logistical structure and our terrible concessionary contract to boot. If Delta had this set up in 95-08, they would of had the upper hand. But our pilot shortage would be even worse right now. Yes it says Delta on the Badge, KCM screws it up all the time, because of it. That's meaningless though, look at the personal running the day to day aspects of the company. It's Delta employees "brought" in to run Endeavor.

From a business standpoint standpoint I disagree, we are one company. Take the emotion out of it. Look at the money and staffing progression.

Ha Ha Ha sounds exactly like Comair circa 2000. Next thing you know they'll be asking for a PID (seniority integration) because their IDs say Delta. What's old is new again.

Onedayatatimee 05-15-2014 07:23 AM


Originally Posted by Catboatsailor (Post 1643574)
Even worse, we are in-sourced labor set up to whip shaw outsourced labor. We have the economy of scale using Delta's logistical structure and our terrible concessionary contract to boot. If Delta had this set up in 95-08, they would of had the upper hand. But our pilot shortage would be even worse right now. Yes it says Delta on the Badge, KCM screws it up all the time, because of it. That's meaningless though, look at the personal running the day to day aspects of the company. It's Delta employees "brought" in to run Endeavor.

From a business standpoint standpoint I disagree, we are one company. Take the emotion out of it. Look at the money and staffing progression.

I'm not debating who is to blame, for our pilots, not being hired by Delta. I'm simply stating the SSP has become a thorn in the side of the company. If Delta wants to attract qualified pilots to staff both the 200 and 900, the SSP will have to be changed. I believe it financially advantageous FOR Delta to return the flow thru. Our goal was to hire 400 pilots this year. We have less than 50 since January. Given our attrition, I predict in five years Delta will be forced to part off the 900 aircraft to multiple regionals. They will not see a return on their investment. If Envoy had approved their contract we would of seen a mass exodus of our FO's going to them. Delta got lucky. Given our current status, when Republic gets their contract to an acceptable level, you will see a higher attrition rate of our pilots to them and other regionals. Bottom line if we liquidate it will affect all Delta Mainline pilots profit sharing. That's a small amount but realize it demonstrates how closely we are tied together.


That's what management said was the goal "400hires". Saying one one thing and trying to do it are two different things. We all know if you put some $$ on the table 400 quality applicants would show up. There's many reasons why they won't.

Like others have said our fait has been decided by Delta awhile ago. Our management team is the middle guys and trying to save face by making it look like they are trying to make it better here. Like they said in the conference call they even admit Delta calls the shots.

Think of all the guys that stuck around vs quitting thinking that we were gonna start padding the bottom of the list and maybe better days were ahead. It's all been a game of controlling attrition. They say what they need to say to work the numbers in their favor. Now that current numbers on property are enough to cover the summer flying and they know a lot of planes are getting parked this fall and the rest of the year the tune changes from management. Now it's a lot of displacements and no raises for first officers who are taking a beating with this bankruptcy contract.

I do think they were hoping to hire at least 100 guys under the current contract to pad for high attrition rates as first officers start quitting because they can't afford to sit reserve in NYC at $37hr. That hasn't happened so plan B. LOA 50

SmitteyB 05-15-2014 08:04 AM


Originally Posted by Captain Tony (Post 1642708)
ExpressJet (ASA) is currently covering flying in LGA and DTW that both Endeavor and GoJets can't perform. It's month to month and has been going on for quire a while. And believe me, we can't wait for you guys to take back LGA. Rumors are an ASA CR2 base in DTW with CR2 CPA extensions in very soon.

Don't get too full of yourself, Endeavor saved ASA's behind plenty last summer when you guys yourself couldn't staff 200 flying.

Nantonaku 05-15-2014 08:39 AM


Originally Posted by Captain Tony (Post 1643533)
Delta will never give you S3 travel bennies back because junior Delta employees and other Connection employees will stop showing up for work. Literally.

Endeavor already has priority in Delta metal for the jumpseat. I don't think too many connection carrier pilots walked off the job after that announcement. They (union and management) are trying to get S3A priority, not jump mainline current employees. You are going to quit going to work after the S3A announcement is made? I don't think so. They are either going to eventually change the priority or they are going to start positive spacing people to work. They have 81 900's contracted to Endeavor for 6 more years. That will require hiring about 3600 pilots at our current attrition rate the next 6 years to keep those planes flying, this year they have hired 15, not 50. Things will have to change eventually.

Mesabah 05-15-2014 08:59 AM

We are run just like Comair was, we even have the same management. We feel this is different for us, since NWA put more distance between itself, and its wholly owned carriers. However, Delta operates its wholly owned as if they were their own airplanes, but we are not their employees.

We can not let ourselves become another Comair, we have to leave emotion out of it.

hockeypilot44 05-15-2014 09:18 AM


Originally Posted by Mesabah (Post 1643740)
We are run just like Comair was, we even have the same management. We feel this is different for us, since NWA put more distance between itself, and its wholly owned carriers. However, Delta operates its wholly owned as if they were their own airplanes, but we are not their employees.

We can not let ourselves become another Comair, we have to leave emotion out of it.

You should quit before it comes to that point.. The writing is on the wall. Anyone who sticks around until the end is a fool (unless you are leaving industry).

Captain Tony 05-15-2014 09:39 AM


Originally Posted by SmitteyB (Post 1643698)
Don't get too full of yourself, Endeavor saved ASA's behind plenty last summer when you guys yourself couldn't staff 200 flying.

Ok..................?

Gearswinger 05-15-2014 10:24 AM

Have fun with that. Delta won't care if you quit from a DCI carrier because Endeavor gets higher priority.

Saabs 05-15-2014 11:12 AM

When your a lifer like captain Tony these flight benefits are more important.

NVUS 05-15-2014 11:27 AM

Well, between SkyWest and ExpressJet, who have jumpseat priority on each other's flights ahead of every other carrier, and fly 760 aircraft to over 250 US cities...jumpseating is a pretty easy thing to do. Congrats on your win with Delta mainline.

Nantonaku 05-15-2014 12:34 PM


Originally Posted by NVUS (Post 1643872)
Well, between SkyWest and ExpressJet, who have jumpseat priority on each other's flights ahead of every other carrier, and fly 760 aircraft to over 250 US cities...jumpseating is a pretty easy thing to do. Congrats on your win with Delta mainline.

What? Is it a competition? 760 jets flying all over the country with pilots at the controls that are paid half the wages of mainline pilots is not something to boast about. It is a travesty and everything that is wrong with this industry.

gojo 05-15-2014 01:19 PM


Originally Posted by Mesabah (Post 1643740)
We are run just like Comair was, we even have the same management. We feel this is different for us, since NWA put more distance between itself, and its wholly owned carriers. However, Delta operates its wholly owned as if they were their own airplanes, but we are not their employees.

We can not let ourselves become another Comair, we have to leave emotion out of it.

I survived two bankruptcy's now (Mesaba and Pinnacle). After a while you can connect the dots and figure out what their plan is or was. Like a previous poster said, it wouldn't take much to right this sinking ship. So at this point one has to wonder, do they want to fix things? It looks to me like they just want to make us float and flounder until it's time to pull the plug. Also Delta does operate us as if they were their own airplanes. Soon almost every major funtion will be in Atlanta. Do you realize how much easier it will be for them to shut us down verses Comair? Shame on us for ever trusting Delta.

jethikoki 05-16-2014 02:34 AM

Just get the McCaskill Bond Amendment for regional pilots as mainline says they want to take the flying back.

80ktsClamp 05-16-2014 10:09 AM


Originally Posted by jethikoki (Post 1644258)
Just get the McCaskill Bond Amendment for regional pilots as mainline says they want to take the flying back.

Unions don't merge airlines, managements do. You're putting the cart in front of the horse and showing how deeply you misunderstand things.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:54 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands