![]() |
PHL Crew Domicile
I have been hearing things about LAX and PHL crew domiciles in various places on these boards. I even spoke with Fabregas and he mentioned expanding more in the northeast in the coming year, but I just passed it off as typical optimism expansion talk bla bla.
I know everything is just a rumor until it isn’t, but was wondering if anybody had any insight on this that’s more than purely speculative. |
Make sure you take all responses as entertainment to this question. Not one person that posts on here has any “real” insight.
|
Ha I guess that’s true. Oh well, entertain me. That’s what this place is really for lol
|
Originally Posted by Pat2389
(Post 2509186)
Ha I guess that’s true. Oh well, entertain me. That’s what this place is really for lol
Or aggravating until it becomes entertaining. Even if it HAS happened, you still have those that try to skew the truth to their perspective. Liars figure and figures lie. |
But PHL is oddly a strong rumor of a new base. Why? Who knows?
|
Originally Posted by DilsonWic
(Post 2509198)
But PHL is oddly a strong rumor of a new base. Why? Who knows?
|
Originally Posted by Otterbox
(Post 2509203)
190 flying going away and need to use 175s to replace that lift is the speculation that makes the most sense.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by 3GreenKSNA
(Post 2509227)
How much wiggle room is left in scope?
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk |
If ENY moves to PHL, PDT and ENY might as well merge.
If anything it will be 50 seat flying because we lost 50 airplanes worth of flying out of here (AWAC) with both PDT and PSA trying to cover it. |
Originally Posted by Newstick189
(Post 2509234)
If ENY moves to PHL, PDT and ENY might as well merge.
If anything it will be 50 seat flying because we lost 50 airplanes worth of flying out of here (AWAC) with both PDT and PSA trying to cover it. |
Originally Posted by Otterbox
(Post 2509203)
190 flying going away and need to use 175s to replace that lift is the speculation that makes the most sense.
|
Originally Posted by 3GreenKSNA
(Post 2509227)
How much wiggle room is left in scope?
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk Republic-86 E75 Compass-20 E75 Envoy-54 E75 (when delivered) Mesa-64 CR9 PSA-54 CR9 Total 278 Breaking it down even farther there can be 75% of total AA narrowbody fleet in RJs which puts the number around 600 total RJs large and small. Skywest/ASA-57 CR7 (8 more than current coming online this summer) Envoy/PSA-61 CR7 Total 118 Where it gets interesting is the 50/44 seat fleet. The E140 will fill in the remainder of the total RJ count as AW and maybe some of the 11 SKYW CR2 leave the fleet TSA/PDT/Envoy-118 E145 Envoy-49 E140 PSA-35 CR2 Total 202 Grand Total 598 If you've read this far the limiting factor currently isn't large RJ scope it's total RJ scope. That's probably why they're not adding those 10 Envoy E75 until Q4. They'll likely need to phase out some of the short term lift that SKYW was doing with their CR2 or CR7 (less Likely) in order to accommodate those E75 for Envoy. There are some assumptions on my part in there but I think it paints a pretty accurate picture of the RJ scope at AA |
Originally Posted by go skers
(Post 2509263)
If they configure all CR7 to 65 seats there's actually quite a bit of room. AA's narrowbody fleet has been holding around 800 aircraft. 40% of that number can be large RJs so around 320 total.
Republic-86 E75 Compass-20 E75 Envoy-54 E75 (when delivered) Mesa-64 CR9 PSA-54 CR9 Total 278 Breaking it down even farther there can be 75% of total AA narrowbody fleet in RJs which puts the number around 600 total RJs large and small. Skywest/ASA-57 CR7 (8 more than current coming online this summer) Envoy/PSA-61 CR7 Total 118 Where it gets interesting is the 50/44 seat fleet. The E140 will fill in the remainder of the total RJ count as AW and maybe some of the 11 SKYW CR2 leave the fleet TSA/PDT/Envoy-118 E145 Envoy-49 E140 PSA-35 CR2 Total 202 Grand Total 598 If you've read this far the limiting factor currently isn't large RJ scope it's total RJ scope. That's probably why they're not adding those 10 Envoy E75 until Q4. They'll likely need to phase out some of the short term lift that SKYW was doing with their CR2 or CR7 (less Likely) in order to accommodate those E75 for Envoy. There are some assumptions on my part in there but I think it paints a pretty accurate picture of the RJ scope at AA The original PSA CR7s are still configured over 65 seats, right? Are there plans to change that, or is it just speculation that they will? I've been hearing "if they bring them down to 65 seats" for a couple years now. |
Originally Posted by Jersdawg
(Post 2509269)
Thank you for running these numbers. I was under the impression that the large RJs were the cap right now, not the total number so I appreciate you clearing that up.
The original PSA CR7s are still configured over 65 seats, right? Are there plans to change that, or is it just speculation that they will? I've been hearing "if they bring them down to 65 seats" for a couple years now. |
Originally Posted by DilsonWic
(Post 2509244)
This is all I can come up with. First start in the merging process. Open like bases.
|
Originally Posted by go skers
(Post 2509282)
The 14 original PSA CR7 had 67 seats. Really not sure if they've reconfigured them or not. I heard they did but a PSA guy would know more than me. The 47 Envoy birds all have 65/63 seat configurations. I believe the 12+8 ASA CR7 all have 65 seats in them while the remaining 37ish CR7 operated by SKYW mostly have the 70 seat configuration that they kept when they came off contract with United.
|
Originally Posted by Otterbox
(Post 2509203)
190 flying going away and need to use 175s to replace that lift is the speculation that makes the most sense.
|
Where are the 190s going? Does AA not want to staff them anymore? Could those ever end up at a regional like envoy?
|
Originally Posted by Seaplane
(Post 2509403)
Where are the 190s going? Does AA not want to staff them anymore? Could those ever end up at a regional like envoy?
|
Originally Posted by Jersdawg
(Post 2509405)
They're being retired to answer your first two questions. To your third: hell no.
|
I know OKC is getting service this summer with the E175 to PHL.
|
Originally Posted by Jersdawg
(Post 2509405)
They're being retired to answer your first two questions. To your third: hell no.
|
Originally Posted by Seaplane
(Post 2509417)
Retired to the desert? Seems like a lot of money to stash. Wonder why they don’t sell I’m sure some carrier in another country would want them.
I wouldn’t doubt if they’re sold outright at a later time. |
Originally Posted by Seaplane
(Post 2509417)
Retired to the desert? Seems like a lot of money to stash. Wonder why they don’t sell I’m sure some carrier in another country would want them.
|
Originally Posted by 35Right
(Post 2509416)
I know OKC is getting service this summer with the E175 to PHL.
|
Originally Posted by E175 Driver
(Post 2509412)
I think that would be good for our pilot group.
|
Originally Posted by Seaplane
(Post 2509403)
Where are the 190s going? Does AA not want to staff them anymore? Could those ever end up at a regional like envoy?
|
Originally Posted by E175 Driver
(Post 2509390)
This is good! more upgrades for the E175 baby bus!
|
I wouldn't doubt that y'all get PHL. AA hasn't given us, PSA, any new flying since last fall. There is a growing rumor yalls 7s are staying or going to XJT. XJT just got awarded two new 7 routes out of CLT.
We cannot grow anymore CAs and our union said that AA is not happy with us at the moment. Plus our Prez said that PSA doesn't do Hub bases beyond CLT. He's not really happy with DCA. So our next base will most likely be ORF or SAV. :confused: |
If you read the AA 3Q SOTA Q&A, it clearly states Piedmont and PSA will be the predominant regionals out of PHL. I could see PSA getting a PHL base, but not Envoy. As for the 190s, it's all speculation at this point but I would expect AA to further increase both RAH and PSA 76 seat flying out of PHL.
|
Originally Posted by flybywp
(Post 2509822)
If you read the AA 3Q SOTA Q&A, it clearly states Piedmont and PSA will be the predominant regionals out of PHL. I could see PSA getting a PHL base, but not Envoy. As for the 190s, it's all speculation at this point but I would expect AA to further increase both RAH and PSA 76 seat flying out of PHL.
|
Originally Posted by bigtime209
(Post 2509842)
This. Envoy will not see PHL. PDT and RAH will be the big players in PHL. PDT will be shifting flying from ROA to PHL and RAH will also be shifting flying to PHL. Envoy will not be part of any PHL plans. Any northeast expansion plans will be mainly NY.
|
Originally Posted by BizJet
(Post 2509814)
I wouldn't doubt that y'all get PHL. AA hasn't given us, PSA, any new flying since last fall. There is a growing rumor yalls 7s are staying or going to XJT. XJT just got awarded two new 7 routes out of CLT.
We cannot grow anymore CAs and our union said that AA is not happy with us at the moment. Plus our Prez said that PSA doesn't do Hub bases beyond CLT. He's not really happy with DCA. So our next base will most likely be ORF or SAV. :confused: |
Originally Posted by E175 Driver
(Post 2510251)
Thats what you guys get for hosing envoy way back when.
|
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 2510314)
Nevermind the ridiculousness of you, someone who wasn’t at Envoy when that happened telling off a PSA pilot who was also not on property when said “hosing” happened.
|
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 2510314)
Nevermind the ridiculousness of you, someone who wasn’t at Envoy when that happened telling off a PSA pilot who was also not on property when said “hosing” happened.
|
Originally Posted by E175 Driver
(Post 2510471)
At least you have the guts to admit it.
|
Originally Posted by E175 Driver
(Post 2510471)
At least you have the guts to admit it.
|
Originally Posted by Pedro4President
(Post 2510488)
^^^^^^ troll level 9000
|
Originally Posted by Theaveragejoker
(Post 2510878)
He almost keeps me from checking out the Envoy forum altogether.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:54 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands