![]() |
Unscientific attrition number crunching
Since I had this and the last year's seniority lists in hand and not much else to do, I ran some numbers.
This year's attrition rule of thumb looks like this: First year of service - 185 Second year of service - 80 Third to within a year of flow - 60/yr Year before the flow - 40 Do what you will with that. I'm mostly leaving it here to compare the numbers next year. |
Waiting for next years results, but these numbers are very, very promising.
|
Originally Posted by BigZ
(Post 2739354)
Since I had this and the last year's seniority lists in hand and not much else to do, I ran some numbers.
This year's attrition rule of thumb looks like this: First year of service - 185 Second year of service - 80 Third to within a year of flow - 60/yr Year before the flow - 40 Do what you will with that. I'm mostly leaving it here to compare the numbers next year. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2739357)
Waiting for next years results, but these numbers are very, very promising.
|
Originally Posted by f16jetmech
(Post 2739417)
These are per month numbers? More details!
So if you were 12/17 hire by 12/18 185 people in front of you left, of which 105 were within their first year of service, 13 within their second, 3 within their third and so forth |
Originally Posted by BigZ
(Post 2739354)
Since I had this and the last year's seniority lists in hand and not much else to do, I ran some numbers.
This year's attrition rule of thumb looks like this: First year of service - 185 Second year of service - 80 Third to within a year of flow - 60/yr Year before the flow - 40 Do what you will with that. I'm mostly leaving it here to compare the numbers next year. |
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 2739654)
Is that 365 for the year total, and the year they were in when they left?
|
That doesn't seem to track. That would mean 600+ people left after flow? I don't think that actually happened. I could be wrong.
If it does track, what does that say about the benefit of the flow? |
Originally Posted by wildcat1
(Post 2739812)
That doesn't seem to track. That would mean 600+ people left after flow? I don't think that actually happened. I could be wrong.
If it does track, what does that say about the benefit of the flow? The most junior guy on the last years list moved up 521 #s. 521=flow + 185. Guy that did his 4th year moved up 400 #s = flow plus 64. With the current seniority list the only thing that can be said is that the attrition is fairly low past the initial year. Slight uptick after two years of service - people probably leaving for immediately greener pastures, and then another slight uptick at 6-7 years of service - logic suggests that those are the guys jumping to the majors. Or the guys that resigned due to forced upgrades. Or whoever really knows, but that whoever isn’t me. |
My seniority number was 1826 when I was hired in April of 2016. It’s now 823. Just over a thousand numbers closer to the top in less than three years. Plus about 500 numbers worth of growth in that same timeframe. All according to the latest seniority list.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:12 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands