Unscientific attrition number crunching
01-08-2019 | 09:22 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 2
Unscientific attrition number crunching
Since I had this and the last year's seniority lists in hand and not much else to do, I ran some numbers.
This year's attrition rule of thumb looks like this:
First year of service - 185
Second year of service - 80
Third to within a year of flow - 60/yr
Year before the flow - 40
Do what you will with that. I'm mostly leaving it here to compare the numbers next year.
This year's attrition rule of thumb looks like this:
First year of service - 185
Second year of service - 80
Third to within a year of flow - 60/yr
Year before the flow - 40
Do what you will with that. I'm mostly leaving it here to compare the numbers next year.
01-09-2019 | 05:10 AM
#3
Line Holder
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: CFI
Since I had this and the last year's seniority lists in hand and not much else to do, I ran some numbers.
This year's attrition rule of thumb looks like this:
First year of service - 185
Second year of service - 80
Third to within a year of flow - 60/yr
Year before the flow - 40
Do what you will with that. I'm mostly leaving it here to compare the numbers next year.
This year's attrition rule of thumb looks like this:
First year of service - 185
Second year of service - 80
Third to within a year of flow - 60/yr
Year before the flow - 40
Do what you will with that. I'm mostly leaving it here to compare the numbers next year.
01-09-2019 | 05:19 AM
#4
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 2
01-09-2019 | 05:28 AM
#5
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 2
No, that's how many numbers people of various years of service moved up from December 2017 to December 2018 for reasons other than flow.
So if you were 12/17 hire by 12/18 185 people in front of you left, of which 105 were within their first year of service, 13 within their second, 3 within their third and so forth
So if you were 12/17 hire by 12/18 185 people in front of you left, of which 105 were within their first year of service, 13 within their second, 3 within their third and so forth
01-09-2019 | 10:20 AM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 48
From: Semi-Retired...
Since I had this and the last year's seniority lists in hand and not much else to do, I ran some numbers.
This year's attrition rule of thumb looks like this:
First year of service - 185
Second year of service - 80
Third to within a year of flow - 60/yr
Year before the flow - 40
Do what you will with that. I'm mostly leaving it here to compare the numbers next year.
This year's attrition rule of thumb looks like this:
First year of service - 185
Second year of service - 80
Third to within a year of flow - 60/yr
Year before the flow - 40
Do what you will with that. I'm mostly leaving it here to compare the numbers next year.
01-09-2019 | 04:47 PM
#9
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 2
The most junior guy on the last years list moved up 521 #s. 521=flow + 185.
Guy that did his 4th year moved up 400 #s = flow plus 64.
With the current seniority list the only thing that can be said is that the attrition is fairly low past the initial year. Slight uptick after two years of service - people probably leaving for immediately greener pastures, and then another slight uptick at 6-7 years of service - logic suggests that those are the guys jumping to the majors. Or the guys that resigned due to forced upgrades. Or whoever really knows, but that whoever isn’t me.
01-09-2019 | 04:47 PM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: E-175 CA
My seniority number was 1826 when I was hired in April of 2016. It’s now 823. Just over a thousand numbers closer to the top in less than three years. Plus about 500 numbers worth of growth in that same timeframe. All according to the latest seniority list.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
