![]() |
When will LAX base open
Any idea when the LAX base will open. I live near sfo and that would be a easy commute
|
Originally Posted by friend
(Post 2746415)
Any idea when the LAX base will open. I live near sfo and that would be a easy commute
|
Believe nothing of what you hear and only half of what you see.
|
Originally Posted by friend
(Post 2746415)
Any idea when the LAX base will open. I live near sfo and that would be a easy commute
|
It is reasonable to wonder what they’ll do with the new 175s. Capacity dumping war on existing routes? many of the markets we go into on the 140/145 are already way over served, flying 10-12 people to/from Chicago all day sure makes the future seem bright
|
I can’t believe anyone actually believes this rumor
|
Apparently it is going to happen when AAG buys Mesa.
Right before we get the mainline seniority numbers with a B scale. And oh, yeah, that will fix the QOL at Envoy as well. Anything else I didn’t cover? |
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 2746787)
Apparently it is going to happen when AAG buys Mesa.
Right before we get the mainline seniority numbers with a B scale. And oh, yeah, that will fix the QOL at Envoy as well. Anything else I didn’t cover? |
No LAX, No pay increases, No reserve changes. This company is always selling something just around the corner.
|
The problem is the company doesn’t have to sell it. There are enough people to generate and believe it. The company doesn’t have to do anything, especially make any changes because of it.
|
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 2746970)
The problem is the company doesn’t have to sell it. There are enough people to generate and believe it. The company doesn’t have to do anything, especially make any changes because of it.
|
What carrot? Seat lock means I have to upgrade to see a 175 base, can’t upgrade unless you fly, can’t fly unless you’re on the 175.
|
Lax has been reopening next quarter since December 2012. The last time this rumor was rampant we were able to track it down to a flight attendant manager telling new hires lax was coming (complete with survey). The union reps put a stop to that. Lax will probably open the month after I flow. Then I get to be that mainline guy muttering about those dam regional guys taking OUR flying. Haha
|
Our class was told AA usually tells the company their needs around 6 months in advance, and as of now there are no talks about LAX base opening. So at least to us, management isn't spreading these rumors but rather actively trying to kill it.
|
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2748467)
Our class was told AA usually tells the company their needs around 6 months in advance, and as of now there are no talks about LAX base opening. So at least to us, management isn't spreading these rumors but rather actively trying to kill it.
Believe me, if they were planning on opening a base they would say something. Heck from a recruitment standpoint it would be huge not to mention how it would help moral for all the west cost commuters. So either there is a very strategic reason for not telling us or they simply don’t have a decision yet. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2748467)
Our class was told AA usually tells the company their needs around 6 months in advance, and as of now there are no talks about LAX base opening. So at least to us, management isn't spreading these rumors but rather actively trying to kill it.
|
Originally Posted by bh539
(Post 2748569)
The new hire classes are being told the LAX base is coming soon. We were told that by recruiting and instructors. Classes behind us as well.
|
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2748688)
Not our class.
|
I was at HQ back in 3-4 months ago. I spoke to a member of management who flat out said that the Compass planes are going to be transferred here and insinuated that it was a done deal. When I asked if they would be operated by Envoy in LAX or be integrated elsewhere in the AA network, he said that part they didn't know yet. Take it for what it's worth. As I said before, even if that is in fact the plan for now, it very well may change before it's all said in done. Don't believe anything until you see it.
|
We had a flight attendant here at Compass leave for Envoy coz she was told by one of the gate agents (envoy) that Envoy was taking the planes and the LAX base next month. Needless to say, she’s been commuting to DFW since 2016.
|
Originally Posted by N200NN
(Post 2748777)
We had a flight attendant here at Compass leave for Envoy coz she was told by one of the gate agents (envoy) that Envoy was taking the planes and the LAX base next month. Needless to say, she’s been commuting to DFW since 2016.
|
Originally Posted by N200NN
(Post 2748777)
We had a flight attendant here at Compass leave for Envoy coz she was told by one of the gate agents (envoy) that Envoy was taking the planes and the LAX base next month. Needless to say, she’s been commuting to DFW since 2016.
Filler |
Originally Posted by N200NN
(Post 2748777)
We had a flight attendant here at Compass leave for Envoy coz she was told by one of the gate agents (envoy) that Envoy was taking the planes and the LAX base next month. Needless to say, she’s been commuting to DFW since 2016.
|
Originally Posted by N200NN
(Post 2748777)
We had a flight attendant here at Compass leave for Envoy coz she was told by one of the gate agents (envoy) that Envoy was taking the planes and the LAX base next month. Needless to say, she’s been commuting to DFW since 2016.
|
Originally Posted by bigtime209
(Post 2748801)
Obviously, IF the planes are transferred, it won't happen until the contract is up. Which is still a little ways off.
Wasn’t that a five year contract? It was signed in 2014, IIRC. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by 4V14T0R
(Post 2748938)
Wasn’t that a five year contract? It was signed in 2014, IIRC.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by bigtime209
(Post 2748961)
Five year contract beginning first quarter of 2015.
That’s not that far off then. A year until they start coming offline at Compass. Do you know what the intake rate was then? 2-3 a month I presume. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
You guys seem eager to put the Compass guys out of work for your own personal gain. That's pretty sad.
|
Originally Posted by JetDoc
(Post 2749056)
You guys seem eager to put the Compass guys out of work for your own personal gain. That's pretty sad.
|
Originally Posted by JetDoc
(Post 2749056)
You guys seem eager to put the Compass guys out of work for your own personal gain. That's pretty sad.
|
Originally Posted by JetDoc
(Post 2749056)
You guys seem eager to put the Compass guys out of work for your own personal gain. That's pretty sad.
But like I said earlier. Highly doubt we see lax as a base anytime soon. |
Originally Posted by pinkvisual
(Post 2749185)
Because of those guys and Skywest I’ve been commuting since 2012. Don’t really care about them to be honest.
But like I said earlier. Highly doubt we see lax as a base anytime soon. I think your displeasure is misplaced. Look at Envoy and AA management. You really think Compass or Skywest had anything to do with that? All they did was bid for the flying. To be mad at the pilots is just lunacy. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
No one knew MIA or LGA were opening until a day prior.
|
Originally Posted by pinkvisual
(Post 2749185)
Because of those guys and Skywest I’ve been commuting since 2012. Don’t really care about them to be honest.
But like I said earlier. Highly doubt we see lax as a base anytime soon. |
RW was open and to the point in one of his meetings a few months ago that he believes that LAX is coming back and that it will be announced this summer. When you couple the CRJ departure announcement with Isom stating that AAG wants the WO’s and three regionals of size, it makes sense. He was directly quoted as saying regional fleets of twenty aircraft are not efficient, and that AAG loses hundreds of thousands of dollars of profit per airplane that is flown by another carrier. Do I want LAX as a base? Absolutely. Do I want another twenty airplanes to staff? Nope. More airplanes means more excuses by the company as to why they can’t improve our QOL.
|
Originally Posted by MD-11Loader
(Post 2749302)
RW was open and to the point in one of his meetings a few months ago that he believes that LAX is coming back and that it will be announced this summer. When you couple the CRJ departure announcement with Isom stating that AAG wants the WO’s and three regionals of size, it makes sense. He was directly quoted as saying regional fleets of twenty aircraft are not efficient, and that AAG loses hundreds of thousands of dollars of profit per airplane that is flown by another carrier. Do I want LAX as a base? Absolutely. Do I want another twenty airplanes to staff? Nope. More airplanes means more excuses by the company as to why they can’t improve our QOL.
|
Originally Posted by JetDoc
(Post 2749275)
You choose to commute.
|
I’d be willing to bet compass renews the contract, or if they don’t we repo the planes to Dfw and we have Mesa or Skywest continue the flying in lax. But it’s a very fluid industry and know one actually knows what’s going to happen besides isom and miss Chloe
|
Originally Posted by Timbird
(Post 2748796)
Well she got a jump on seniority haha
|
I don’t know if I’d put 20 airplanes in the hard to staff category. Between transferring the CRJs, it wouldn’t take but a few of the more tired 145s to go back to the desert to solve that.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:58 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands