![]() |
Originally Posted by bigtime209
(Post 2812467)
Anyone that actually thinks something positive is going to come out of the negotiations probably hasn't worked here for very long and is in for a big disappointment. Anyone that has been here over the long term and has been through past negotiations and concessionary contracts...well, it's just going to be par for the course.
|
Originally Posted by GCPhoenix
(Post 2812515)
This attitude is the problem, and exactly the reason why nothing changes. Management knows they can take advantage of you and you'll just lie down and take it. You've been beaten into submission.
|
Originally Posted by GCPhoenix
(Post 2812515)
This attitude is the problem, and exactly the reason why nothing changes. Management knows they can take advantage of you and you'll just lie down and take it. You've been beaten into submission.
|
I love how we gave concessions on the last two LOAs when we had leverage. Now with no leverage we say “no concessions.” Seems backwards
|
That's regional alpa for you.
|
If we do concessions let’s make sure the concessions are visible and affect new hires on the 175 in DFW and ORD (ie nothing that only impacts people who are on rsv)
|
Originally Posted by NoValueAviator
(Post 2812822)
If we do concessions let’s make sure the concessions are visible and affect new hires on the 175 in DFW and ORD (ie nothing that only impacts people who are on rsv)
175 needs to have it's QOL dropped to the level of the other fleets. Also need to pull the MOU/LOA that allows cadets seniority. |
Without negotiating in public, there is a difference between a concession, and a concessionary contract. If the pay raise increases each pilots cost by X amount, and a concession cost each pilot <X, then that still means the gain has increased the value of the contract, and should be voted on by the pilot group. I very well may still vote that down, but it is not a ‘net concession.’
We need to remember that our entire contract (beyond pay rates) has a net cost per pilot, and we absolutely should demand that the net cost be increased with the PSA rates, how much should be up to the pilot group. |
Boy, AAG has done a crafty number on us. Instead of asking for Endeavor rates, everyone wants PSA rates.
|
Originally Posted by highfarfast
(Post 2812896)
Boy, AAG has done a crafty number on us. Instead of asking for Endeavor rates, everyone wants PSA rates.
Someone pointed out the truth. This can't be repeated enough. +1,000,000 |
Originally Posted by FlyPurdue
(Post 2812871)
Without negotiating in public, there is a difference between a concession, and a concessionary contract. If the pay raise increases each pilots cost by X amount, and a concession cost each pilot <X, then that still means the gain has increased the value of the contract, and should be voted on by the pilot group. I very well may still vote that down, but it is not a ‘net concession.’
We need to remember that our entire contract (beyond pay rates) has a net cost per pilot, and we absolutely should demand that the net cost be increased with the PSA rates, how much should be up to the pilot group. |
Originally Posted by mketch11
(Post 2812907)
So when the Union email says “under no circumstances are concessions to be discussed. Any indication that the company expects the pilots to "pay" for similar improvements will be a non-starter,” we should reinterpret that as concessions are ok as long as they are not “net concessions”?
Once again, I don’t want to negotiate in public, but I hope all of us have calculated what our personal NPV and cash flow would look like from a raise matching PSA (or ENDV) given today verses in 3,6, or even 12 months from now, and then what it has to be to break even. I know that AAG has done that same calculation. |
Minimum 20% raise across the board, no concession whether positive or negative. You want consider concessions,wait till you're at aa, give up all you want then. But here NO CONCESSIONS OF ANY KIND. Negotiate that.
|
Originally Posted by buddies8
(Post 2812986)
Minimum 20% raise across the board, no concession whether positive or negative. You want consider concessions,wait till you're at aa, give up all you want then. But here NO CONCESSIONS OF ANY KIND. Negotiate that.
|
The main point that people are missing is THERE SHOULD BE NO NEGOTIATING GOING ON. THE COMOANY JUST NEEDS TO COME WITH PSA RATES, THE UNION AGRESS AND SIGNS THE DOTTED LINE.
Why are we even thinking about negotiating anything, when PSA didn't? It isn't our job to make envoy competitive, that is up to management. There should be no negotiating these pay raises. They need pilots to fly their planes....this is the price they have to pay. Management doesn't go negotiate the price of fuel they need to fly their planes, they should be able to negotiate the price they NOW need to pay pilots. |
Originally Posted by highfarfast
(Post 2812896)
Boy, AAG has done a crafty number on us. Instead of asking for Endeavor rates, everyone wants PSA rates.
|
I want back pay!
|
Has the union put any more effort into ending bonuses? They are a big reason pay has stagnated this long.
Also agree with the sentiment of others, the contract is not open for negotiations and there is no reason to discuss concessions. This is a chance for Envoy to raise very low wages in order to maintain steady hiring, the union should not be giving up anything. Any pay increase should be industry leading at the time of signing. |
I am with you, we want minimum AA Group 1 pay rates across the board, nothing less, also NO CONCESSIOS of any type.
|
PSA just raised their cadet assistance payment again..
$25,500 bonus if you're a cadet. Edit: That's $75,500 first year pay for cadets. Our should match/beat that. NO BONUSES. |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2813545)
PSA just raised their cadet assistance payment again..
$25,500 bonus if you're a cadet. Edit: That's $75,500 first year pay for cadets. Our should match/beat that. NO BONUSES. The money is there. No bonuses. Hard pay. |
Bonuses are not needed. More than enough pilots to staff the regionals. Pilot shortage is a joke.
|
Mec better come a hefty pay raise across the board for all.
|
We honestly need to see more than what PSA was offered. If I'm making 900 more per month with their hourly rates, I'll only be making 200 more per quarter once we lose the bonuses. Big whoop $800 a year.
|
are you guys still filling classes?
|
Originally Posted by Jecain7
(Post 2814268)
are you guys still filling classes?
|
Here’s my bet. Envoy and “ALPA” will sign an LOU/LOA soon that starts CAs and FOs on a higher pay step. Much like the current agreement that starts new FOs on year 3 or 4 or whatever. They won’t actually increase the pay scale, they’ll instead sign a temporary agreement that creates artificial rates (all new CAs start at year 9 pay, and FOs start at year 11 pay!) This will allow them to pull the “new” pay rates whenever they want.
|
Originally Posted by Jecain7
(Post 2814268)
are you guys still filling classes?
|
Originally Posted by Shiner
(Post 2814436)
I know some people in recruiting. They said applications are way down since the PSA raises were announced.
|
Doubt it....
|
Originally Posted by Shiner
(Post 2814436)
I know some people in recruiting. They said applications are way down since the PSA raises were announced.
|
Originally Posted by MD-11Loader
(Post 2814594)
I’m sure it’s the opposite. Apps are probably way up because the masses believe we will get raises and want to get in at the beginning of the wave.
I also heard we won't be getting a raise in 2019. |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2814626)
I heard applications were initially up.
I also heard we won't be getting a raise in 2019. |
Originally Posted by MD-11Loader
(Post 2814672)
We don’t need a raise, we are about to have two new crew rooms. That’s enough spending by the company.
|
Meanwhile, another day goes by where PSA is compensated at a significantly higher rate than Envoy pilots.
Have a great Monday! |
Originally Posted by Voski
(Post 2819297)
Meanwhile, another day goes by where PSA is compensated at a significantly higher rate than Envoy pilots.
Have a great Monday! It's been much longer since Endeavor started being compensated as much higher rates. |
Originally Posted by BigZ
(Post 2819319)
Let the MEC do their thing.
It's been much longer since Endeavor started being compensated as much higher rates. |
Endeavor has had pay raises for almost 2 years now. Average pilot over there has made at least 60 K more than you in that time. What could you do with that?
|
Originally Posted by ERAUAV8TR
(Post 2819341)
..... has had pay raises for almost 2 years now. Average pilot over there has made at least 60 K more than you in that time. What could you do with that?
|
Originally Posted by 3EngineTaxi
(Post 2819354)
Actually it's been over 4 years if you count their retention bonuses that were paid to ALL pilots, not just a few select groups here and there.
PI apparently we can’t say SS |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:36 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands