![]() |
AE Performance Bonus Award
Did anyone get the AE Performance Bonus Award? I can’t ever remember not getting it, even if it was just a small part. Where is the communication on why we didn’t get? Last I knew is we were hitting our marks. Strange! Did the criteria change? Any information?
|
Originally Posted by ERAUAV8TR
(Post 2813778)
Did anyone get the AE Performance Bonus Award? I can’t ever remember not getting it, even if it was just a small part. Where is the communication on why we didn’t get? Last I knew is we were hitting our marks. Strange! Did the criteria change? Any information?
|
They changed it to the T0 times, which is completely impossible to achieve (25minute turns in the 145, 30 in CRJ/175) considering everyone stands in the jet bridge for half an hour waiting on the piedmont rampers to unload the valet checked bags. Hence they no longer have to pay it out.
Typical Envoy. |
I thought it was pretty ridiculous when Envoy put out the latest version of optimized boarding. It is hard enough to make the extended turn times at a hub, let alone the shorter ones at an out station. Rather than building in more time in the schedule which would allow a catch up if a previous flight was late, it now makes all subsequent flights late.
BUT, since Mesa couldn’t make its times, AAG gave them more block time. See article and quote from it below. https://skift.com/2019/02/05/american-airlines-warns-one-of-its-regional-airlines-to-improve/ American also will schedule more block time for many Mesa flights, a move that should allow Mesa to pad on-time performance. Flights that had been slated as late could now arrive on-time, according to DOT guidelines. But Envoy would rather just take away performance bonuses from employees. Another example of tripping over dollars to save dimes and hurting themselves rather than helping themselves since they would have to reward the employees. |
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 2813917)
I thought it was pretty ridiculous when Envoy put out the latest version of optimized boarding. It is hard enough to make the extended turn times at a hub, let alone the shorter ones at an out station. Rather than building in more time in the schedule which would allow a catch up if a previous flight was late, it now makes all subsequent flights late.
BUT, since Mesa couldn’t make its times, AAG gave them more block time. See article and quote from it below. https://skift.com/2019/02/05/american-airlines-warns-one-of-its-regional-airlines-to-improve/ American also will schedule more block time for many Mesa flights, a move that should allow Mesa to pad on-time performance. Flights that had been slated as late could now arrive on-time, according to DOT guidelines. But Envoy would rather just take away performance bonuses from employees. Another example of tripping over dollars to save dimes and hurting themselves rather than helping themselves since they would have to reward the employees. |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2813808)
They changed it to the T0 times, which is completely impossible to achieve (25minute turns in the 145, 30 in CRJ/175) considering everyone stands in the jet bridge for half an hour waiting on the piedmont rampers to unload the valet checked bags. Hence they no longer have to pay it out.
Typical Envoy. |
Pay cut. Lol
|
Originally Posted by smtx123
(Post 2813955)
They’re planning less than 30 min turns on the 175 now. Had a few 25 min turns last month.
Other than a new tagline does anyone know what the definition is of this new "optimized boarding?" -Keep the dirty side down |
Optimized boarding means send pax during cleanup and preflight. Pax can be sent when catering and cleaners are on board.
|
Originally Posted by pangolin
(Post 2814045)
Optimized boarding means send pax during cleanup and preflight. Pax can be sent when catering and cleaners are on board.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:43 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands