![]() |
Pay raises... not such a good deal.
Seems like we got hosed. Our fo pay is... fine now. But 15% on $66 an hour still isn't exactly industry leading. We didn't get back pay through may 15th or many of the other improvements in the AIP. Kind of seems like a raw deal, no?
|
Originally Posted by slantgolf
(Post 2858729)
Seems like we got hosed. Our fo pay is... fine now. But 15% on $66 an hour still isn't exactly industry leading. We didn't get back pay through may 15th or many of the other improvements in the AIP. Kind of seems like a raw deal, no?
Let's wait for the facts, then we can assess if it was a win/lose for the pilot group. |
I wouldn’t say we got screwed, but I feel like we could’ve got a better deal. Let’s wait and see the details.
|
The initial signs are very bad. Extremely disappointed to have conceded on retro pay. Guess we’ll see what else is in there.
|
Originally Posted by Tellheritwasntu
(Post 2858742)
I wouldn’t say we got screwed, but I feel like we could’ve got a better deal. Let’s wait and see the details.
We got Piedmont pay rates. Fly a 175, the largest and heaviest RJ out there, for ERJ140 rates. This is so far from the AIP, I almost don't believe it. |
The math doesn’t work for CAs, I agree. We’re gonna be $5+/hr short of PSA if the 15% figure is reliable.
|
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2858749)
I would say with almost certainty Captains got screwed.
We got Piedmont pay rates. Fly a 175, the largest and heaviest RJ out there, for ERJ140 rates. This is so far from the AIP, I almost don't believe it. Let's see the deal, and judge it then. |
Originally Posted by NoValueAviator
(Post 2858752)
The math doesn’t work for CAs, I agree. We’re gonna be $5+/hr short of PSA if the 15% figure is reliable.
|
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2858755)
And the 500 senior guys will be over PSA, if the blended vs. pay band rate rumors are true.
|
Originally Posted by NoValueAviator
(Post 2858752)
The math doesn’t work for CAs, I agree. We’re gonna be $5+/hr short of PSA if the 15% figure is reliable.
|
Anything on flow numbers?
|
Originally Posted by Chunk
(Post 2858760)
Anything on flow numbers?
|
Union: "You don't want to live up to the AIP? No problem, we don't need you to. What do you want?"
Management: "Be our *****" Union: "OK, whatever you need!" :mad: |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2858762)
The next group goes from 15 to 20 a month.
:mad: |
Originally Posted by highfarfast
(Post 2858775)
We should never give up anything for flow. THEY are the ones proclaiming short flow for new hires.
:mad: What did we give up? We are talking about something no-one here has any idea of. Let's just chill for a day and see what the facts are. You guys are popping a blood vein over speculation. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2858778)
Without seeing the deal, I'm not ready to make that conclusion.
What did we give up? :mad: /filler/ |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2858778)
Without seeing the deal, I'm not ready to make that conclusion.
What did we give up? We are talking about something no-one here has any idea of. Let's just chill for a day and see what the facts are. You guys are popping a blood vein over speculation. We gave up leverage. Once a deal is inked, you can forget about any more improvements until the contract is up. And that’s not until 2022. Welcome to Envoy, enjoy the low pay until just before you flow. The best thing about working here is you might get out 2 months sooner! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Shiner
(Post 2858781)
We gave up leverage. Once a deal is inked, you can forget about any more improvements until the contract is up. And that’s not until 2022.
Welcome to Envoy, enjoy the low pay until just before you flow. The best thing about working here is you might get out 2 months sooner! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk The only leverage we had was captain attrition and FO recruiting. If this deal isn't enough to fix those issues, then they will give us more. |
Should have held our ground for AIP.
:mad: |
I’m just going off what envoy published: up to 15% pay raises for captains. I hope its better. But idk why envoy would publish less than they could. If the pay raise for captains was going to be 20%, you know they’d brag about it like it was god’s gift to regional flying.
|
Originally Posted by slantgolf
(Post 2858798)
I’m just going off what envoy published: up to 15% pay raises for captains. I hope its better. But idk why envoy would publish less than they could. If the pay raise for captains was going to be 20%, you know they’d brag about it like it was god’s gift to regional flying.
And 0.1% is still “up to” 15%. Prepare to be underwhelmed. |
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 2858806)
You’re right. If even one pilot is eligible for 15.1%, Envoy would claim it.
And 0.1% is still “up to” 15%. Prepare to be underwhelmed. |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2858749)
I would say with almost certainty Captains got screwed.
We got Piedmont pay rates. Fly a 175, the largest and heaviest RJ out there, for ERJ140 rates. This is so far from the AIP, I almost don't believe it. The AIP still would have paid you the B scale with the small RJ rates. How do people not understand this? What helped make up the difference in the money that you wouldn’t make compared to PSA was the sick bank payout. |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2858749)
I would say with almost certainty Captains got screwed.
We got Piedmont pay rates. Fly a 175, the largest and heaviest RJ out there, for ERJ140 rates. This is so far from the AIP, I almost don't believe it. If pay banding wasn’t here and people got paid based on equipment, then you would still be paid the 145 rate BECAUSE YOU WOULDNT FLY THE 175!!!!!!!!!!!! In your world you would be paid PDT rates and fly soon to be PDT airplanes. |
Originally Posted by Pedro4President
(Post 2858886)
If pay banding wasn’t here and people got paid based on equipment, then you would still be paid the 145 rate BECAUSE YOU WOULDNT FLY THE 175!!!!!!!!!!!!
In your world you would be paid PDT rates and fly soon to be PDT airplanes. |
From what I can see, no capt got more than 12% or less than 10% but no one got 15% mgt posted
|
From the company release: “...with pilots to receive another scheduled contractual increase on Jan. 1, 2020.”
It’s less than a dollar raise... |
It's less than 1% that we were to get.
Nothing like taking any deal.mgt offers. |
“First officer pay over $50 an hour!”
Yeah, by 0.4% This place was so good way back when I started. In the RW/PF era, this company has become an amazing marketing company selling crap pay for mini mainline jets. Just saw Pedro was awarded Most Admired CEO of North Texas. |
“Pedro consistently cons veterans and college kids into unscrupulous employment agreements that undermine the value of quality pilots all while driving profit margins higher and higher.”
That should be the opening salvo |
Why did ALPA national send those analysts that spent all that time proving to the company that we had to earn more than PSA to be equal to PSA?
Just to take this ****? :mad: |
Originally Posted by buddies8
(Post 2859167)
From what I can see, no capt got more than 12% or less than 10% but no one got 15% mgt posted
|
Which group would that be.
|
Originally Posted by buddies8
(Post 2859312)
Which group would that be.
Payband C at 7 years is 16% 82.55-95.83 |
Originally Posted by LineUpAndPay
(Post 2859335)
Payband C at 6 years is 15.9% 80.94-93.80
Payband C at 7 years is 16% 82.55-95.83 |
Originally Posted by havick206
(Post 2859398)
In theory no one but lifers should see Pay band C 7 year CA rates according to recruiting.
|
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2859401)
Most junior Pay band C guy is a 9/2014 hire.
|
Where have these rates been posted or published? How does everyone seem to know the details already?
|
Originally Posted by 3EngineTaxi
(Post 2859436)
Where have these rates been posted or published? How does everyone seem to know the details already?
|
Originally Posted by bigtime209
(Post 2859465)
In essence, you will make less than your PSA counterpart up until your last few months at Envoy.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:08 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands