![]() |
Interactive Seniority list
The interactive and system seniority lists have been updated and posted on the ENY MEC ALPA web page.
|
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 2895063)
The interactive and system seniority lists have been updated and posted on the ENY MEC ALPA web page.
|
Originally Posted by ENH017
(Post 2895070)
Although they don't include the flow changes due to the LoA. Besides flow dates for most, the rest of the info should be accurate.
|
As of right now the last guy on that list shows a flow date of Jan 2029 if anyone is curious.
|
Originally Posted by Chato
(Post 2895101)
As of right now the last guy on that list shows a flow date of Jan 2029 if anyone is curious.
|
Originally Posted by Chato
(Post 2895101)
As of right now the last guy on that list shows a flow date of Jan 2029 if anyone is curious.
|
It’s NOT a 9 year flow here why does everybody keep saying that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by UncreativeUser
(Post 2895382)
It’s NOT a 9 year flow here why does everybody keep saying that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Chato
(Post 2895384)
I know geeez, alpa should remove that list from their website. How dare they post those projections online if they're not even accurate :rolleyes:
https://www.envoyair.com/american-airlines-group/ |
Originally Posted by UncreativeUser
(Post 2895382)
It’s NOT a 9 year flow here why does everybody keep saying that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by UncreativeUser
(Post 2895382)
It’s NOT a 9 year flow here why does everybody keep saying that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk How is it not? What would the flow time be for a new hire? |
Originally Posted by Lee 64
(Post 2896842)
How is it not? What would the flow time be for a new hire?
|
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2896844)
Realistically, assuming no changes in the contract, 6.5-7.5 years.
The majority of our attrition happens early in the list. If you are just “hoping” that it’s that time frame I would agree, however to state it so confidently requires you to prove the logic. I am genuinely interested. |
Originally Posted by Lee 64
(Post 2896842)
How is it not? What would the flow time be for a new hire?
There is a lot of speculation that hiring will pick up and more people will not simply wait for flow given how the flow time is getting longer now. However, that's speculation. I do think there's SOME truth to that and flow time will be less than the union projection for someone hired today but I don't think it will be by a lot. My GUESS is around 8 years. It's really difficult to make sensible math out if it and get it much below that though. The 6 year projection by the company comes off like a straight up lie. *There was a recent LOA that increases the max flow for a small group of pilots per month which will effect everyone downhill from that group by about 3.5 months. The latest interactive seniority list didn't update that part of the union projection for some reason so the projection should be 9 years instead of 9.3. |
Would be nice if they update the list to reflect the most recent agreement
|
What is everyone's beef, flow will be between 7-9 years if there is no outside attrition. The outside attrition is averaging 20 per month. Run the numbers yourself and stop beotching.
Or go complain to mgt and recruiting dept. Union is not required to show you your flow date, mgt is but they wont. |
Originally Posted by buddies8
(Post 2896893)
What is everyone's beef, flow will be between 7-9 years if there is no outside attrition. The outside attrition is averaging 20 per month. Run the numbers yourself and stop beotching.
Or go complain to mgt and recruiting dept. Union is not required to show you your flow date, mgt is but they wont. |
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 2896913)
That is the whole beef. Envoy has, and continues to, advertise a 5 to 5 1/2 year flow. The union’s numbers are a best outside estimate based on language that comes from the contract and its amendments. Envoy’s numbers come from unicorns and pixie dust. In the absence of any supporting evidence, the numbers from Envoy are more unsubstantiated lies and propaganda.
|
Originally Posted by AV8R72
(Post 2897077)
They told the last INDOC class 6 years and historically their numbers have been spot on and the union had been “worst causing it”
|
Originally Posted by AV8R72
(Post 2897077)
They told the last INDOC class 6 years and historically their numbers have been spot on and the union had been “worst causing it”
|
Originally Posted by AV8R72
(Post 2897077)
They told the last INDOC class 6 years and historically their numbers have been spot on and the union had been “worst causing it”
Going forward are they going to be right? We can only use probabilities when talking about the future. Right now I think the company will likely be right when it comes to Charlie Brown. (If you don’t know who CB is then your opinion doesn’t matter. You haven’t been around long enough.) Predicting a new hires flow date is a bunch of horse manure. There isn’t a realistic way to predict attrition, hiring rates, macro economics, or political chaos to accurately predict a flow date that far out. By the way the last flow prediction the company put out was off by more than 6 months in most cases I looked at. |
Originally Posted by Pedro4President
(Post 2897141)
Let’s just get something straight. In respect to flow the company has NEVER been right.
Going forward are they going to be right? We can only use probabilities when talking about the future. Right now I think the company will likely be right when it comes to Charlie Brown. (If you don’t know who CB is then your opinion doesn’t matter. You haven’t been around long enough.) Predicting a new hires flow date is a bunch of horse manure. There isn’t a realistic way to predict attrition, hiring rates, macro economics, or political chaos to accurately predict a flow date that far out. By the way the last flow prediction the company put out was off by more than 6 months in most cases I looked at. |
Originally Posted by bigtime209
(Post 2897146)
Lol...I think you mean Charlie Bucket.
|
Originally Posted by Naviator
(Post 2897147)
Beat me to it.
|
Originally Posted by AV8R72
(Post 2897077)
They told the last INDOC class 6 years and historically their numbers have been spot on and the union had been “worst causing it”
|
Does anybody know what "XXX" means for the seat designation?
|
Originally Posted by Leeroy
(Post 2897859)
Does anybody know what "XXX" means for the seat designation?
|
Makes sense. I assume it applies to any FMLA sort of absence. The real question is why is there an "XXX" next to my name?? I guess I need to send a quick email to the CPO.
|
For those who come here for flow. Why not tell envoy in order to accept there offered you need a letter signed by management stating the date and year of your flow. Other than that no one cares when you flow. It will happen when it happens. Remember after january you need a clean bill of health to flow.
|
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2897868)
Inactive. Usually people who failed training, or dropped mil orders during indoc.
|
Originally Posted by Chato
(Post 2897922)
So what happens if you fail training? Don't they just show you the door? I thought most of those xxx are on some kind of military leave, FMLA etc
|
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2897927)
It's all written in the contract. Read it.
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2897868)
Inactive. Usually people who failed training, or dropped mil orders during indoc.
|
Originally Posted by bigtime209
(Post 2897929)
Mr. Know it all...
Dude...it's a lot more than guys who failed out of training or that are on military orders. A much more common explanation that your nonsense is it could be guys that are in MGMT, it could be guys that are now in the schoolhouse, it could be guys that now work in Recruiting, it could be guys that are SA, it could be guys that are out on Sick Leave/FMLA, it could be guys that are full time MEC Officers, etc. Dera always touted the contract and how the company really isn’t as bad as we all said. Here we sit with them actively violating the contract with nothing but an “oops, sorry for the misunderstanding”. I wonder if crew scheduling or the cpo would take that as an excuse for missing an assignment? “Oops I misunderstood the contract section regarding show times, sorry”. |
Originally Posted by Cyio
(Post 2897941)
Dera is just salty because he can’t come to the defense of the company on this latest issue. Everything we have all been saying for over a year about how this company will screw you is coming true.
Dera always touted the contract and how the company really isn’t as bad as we all said. Here we sit with them actively violating the contract with nothing but an “oops, sorry for the misunderstanding”. I wonder if crew scheduling or the cpo would take that as an excuse for missing an assignment? “Oops I misunderstood the contract section regarding show times, sorry”. |
Originally Posted by bigtime209
(Post 2897929)
Mr. Know it all...
Dude...it's a lot more than guys who failed out of training or that are on military orders. A much more common explanation that your nonsense is it could be guys that are in MGMT, it could be guys that are now in the schoolhouse, it could be guys that now work in Recruiting, it could be guys that are SA, it could be guys that are out on Sick Leave/FMLA, it could be guys that are full time MEC Officers, etc. The guys in the schoolhouse are AETC. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2897927)
It's all written in the contract. Read it.
|
Originally Posted by Chato
(Post 2898082)
I am pretty positive you wouldn't give this type of answer to someone you’re sitting in the cockpit with, so why do it online? But thanks man, I’ll make sure to look that up.
Also agree with what the others have said about him being salty for being wrong about the company being late on pay. He was one of the first to post about it here and on FB saying how they paid us out in full without fully checking the numbers. While also talking down people saying "Wait until September 30 to complain" and "This post (about back pay) aged well". And then went silent on it. For someone 9 months on property he really has quite the ego. |
Gotta keep the facade up so he can tell Mommy and Daddy he works at a good regional?
|
Originally Posted by MEGAFUPM
(Post 2898213)
Also agree with what the others have said about him being salty for being wrong about the company being late on pay. He was one of the first to post about it here and on FB saying how they paid us out in full without fully checking the numbers. While also talking down people saying "Wait until September 30 to complain" and "This post (about back pay) aged well". And then went silent on it. For someone 9 months on property he really has quite the ego.
|
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2900310)
I still believe my pay was correct. If they are paying more, I'm keeping my mouth shut and not going to complain. My backpay was within a reasonable error margin of what I expected to get. There are others who believe their pay was correct as well, and some who believe they were actually overpaid. Clearly these people were in the minority, but they were the first ones I talked to and that's why I believed the pay was correct for most. My mistake.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:51 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands