![]() |
Negotiating Committee
It was brought to my attention that the new negotiating committee chairman is a lifer at envoy. My understanding is that 99.9% of the pilot group wants to flow, therefore this chairman doesn’t align with the pilot’s view. Just some food for thought!
“In Unity” |
Negotiating Committee
Originally Posted by MqWhistleblower
(Post 2928604)
It was brought to my attention that the new negotiating committee chairman is a lifer at envoy. My understanding is that 99.9% of the pilot group wants to flow, therefore this chairman doesn’t align with the pilot’s view. Just some food for thought!
“In Unity” Asinine assumptions! |
Originally Posted by MqWhistleblower
(Post 2928604)
It was brought to my attention that the new negotiating committee chairman is a lifer at envoy. My understanding is that 99.9% of the pilot group wants to flow, therefore this chairman doesn’t align with the pilot’s view. Just some food for thought!
“In Unity” |
Isn't he retiring soon anyway
|
Originally Posted by SilentLurker
(Post 2928615)
Asinine assumptions!
|
Originally Posted by ENH017
(Post 2928618)
I've got a bridge to sell you if you think the union/pilot group has any significant say in how many of us AA will take anyways.
|
Negotiating Committee
Originally Posted by MqWhistleblower
(Post 2928636)
The union is suppose to represent what the pilot group wants. Idk if we have a significant say, but we gotta express our point of view.
They did, when they voted in the NYC & DFW & Training Center Reps that voted Yes! Send them emails with complaints. |
Originally Posted by MqWhistleblower
(Post 2928604)
It was brought to my attention that the new negotiating committee chairman is a lifer at envoy. My understanding is that 99.9% of the pilot group wants to flow, therefore this chairman doesn’t align with the pilot’s view. Just some food for thought!
“In Unity” I have pretty good information that there are at least a few new members on the negotiating committee that want to work for some QOL improvements. I want to see some changes in both QOL and flow, but of course, who knows what will come out of any of this |
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 2928639)
Sorry, but whether or not what you say is factual, you lose credibility with creating a new username to say it.
I have pretty good information that there are at least a few new members on the negotiating committee that want to work for some QOL improvements. I want to see some changes in both QOL and flow, but of course, who knows what will come out of any of this |
Originally Posted by MqWhistleblower
(Post 2928604)
It was brought to my attention that the new negotiating committee chairman is a lifer at envoy. My understanding is that 99.9% of the pilot group wants to flow, therefore this chairman doesn’t align with the pilot’s view. Just some food for thought!
“In Unity” |
Having a lifer could be a good thing. The company cannot use flow as blackmail on getting things done.
"Forget the AIP, this is what we will give you. And you will sign, if you want to flow". |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2928683)
Having a lifer could be a good thing. The company cannot use flow as blackmail on getting things done.
"Forget the AIP, this is what we will give you. And you will sign, if you want to flow". |
I wish we had a lifer as MEC too.
It's a good thing. Brings stability and vested interest. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2928683)
Having a lifer could be a good thing. The company cannot use flow as blackmail on getting things done.
"Forget the AIP, this is what we will give you. And you will sign, if you want to flow". You want someone who won't flow negotiating for you, because all the other folks who negotiated for you sold y'all down the river for their own flow's sake. |
Man...
I can not believe I'm making a post in agreement with Dera. I've always thought the guys that intend on staying here are the guys best suited for representing us. Give it a little thought, more than the surface "he's not like me" kinda thought, and I think you'll agree. |
Don't forget to wash your hands if you feel dirty now.
|
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2928759)
Don't forget to wash your hands if you feel dirty now.
|
Racist, seriously? While I don’t agree with the post, there was never any mention of race.
|
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 2928639)
Sorry, but whether or not what you say is factual, you lose credibility with creating a new username to say it.
I have pretty good information that there are at least a few new members on the negotiating committee that want to work for some QOL improvements. I want to see some changes in both QOL and flow, but of course, who knows what will come out of any of this Management has just one desire. Keep their costs to an absolute low while while simultaneously keeping pilot morale and expectations even lower. |
Originally Posted by Crimson5
(Post 2928932)
Racist, seriously? While I don’t agree with the post, there was never any mention of race.
Also you dont make it cheaper at regionals just to get your flow because then there is always a cheaper alternative. When and if flow stops it will be to late to fight for things. You will barely keep what you have. If you keep the regionals as a cheap operation, why would mainline bring flying back to mainline. Please dont mention the hiring for the next 10 years, one big world screw up and that's all out the window. You play the averages, you all are putting all the eggs in one basket. |
Originally Posted by buddies8
(Post 2928993)
Also you dont make it cheaper at regionals just to get your flow because then there is always a cheaper alternative. When and if flow stops it will be to late to fight for things. You will barely keep what you have.
If you keep the regionals as a cheap operation, why would mainline bring flying back to mainline. Please dont mention the hiring for the next 10 years, one big world screw up and that's all out the window. You play the averages, you all are putting all the eggs in one basket. |
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 2928935)
The other reality is The Envoy is a diverse pilot group with diverse desires. There needs to be all groups represented.
Management has just one desire. Keep their costs to an absolute low while while simultaneously keeping pilot morale and expectations even lower. |
Look on the bright side, you could be like PSA where we have the MEC Chair, Vice Chair, and 3 of 6 voting reps are lifers.
Guess how bid their raises were back in April. Can't really blame them for that, because there weren't any real concessions attached, but it was a nice chunk of change, nonetheless. |
Originally Posted by CheewiesCopilot
(Post 2929051)
one word PILOT STRIKE !!!! jk
1. That's two words. 2. Pilots have gotten some pretty serious carpet dances for posting crap like that online. You want to bet your career on your anonymity on APC? 3. One 'e.' |
Originally Posted by CheewiesCopilot
(Post 2929051)
one word PILOT STRIKE !!!! jk
You might want to lock that kind of talk up. |
Originally Posted by CLE to IAH
(Post 2929069)
Yo man. You have described yourself as an applicant/candidate.
You might want to lock that kind of talk up. |
Originally Posted by CheewiesCopilot
(Post 2929128)
No one can take a joke.
|
Fair point boss. Thankfully I'm a corporate pilot
|
Negotiating Committee
Originally Posted by CheewiesCopilot
(Post 2929131)
Fair point boss. Thankfully I'm a corporate pilot
Oh my God someone said strike. Where is your humanity. You should be burned at the stake for such a joke! :) [MENTION=90230]CheewiesCopilot[/MENTION], the fear conditioning here is real. Come one, come all for the flow, and witness the greatest ****show on earth! The future face of pilots at mainline will be interesting to witness. AAG will have a ball. The taste of defeated Labor is a delight, they (executives) will savory it as long as possible before they swallow. |
Originally Posted by MqWhistleblower
(Post 2928604)
It was brought to my attention that the new negotiating committee chairman is a lifer at envoy. My understanding is that 99.9% of the pilot group wants to flow, therefore this chairman doesn’t align with the pilot’s view. Just some food for thought!
“In Unity” |
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 2929022)
..........but QOL improvements, specifically to reserve rules and schedules could be really improved without too much cost. The biggest cost would be to management and Crew Scheduling egos.
Don’t poke the tiger..... trust me on that. |
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 2934136)
That has always been the problem.
Don’t poke the tiger..... trust me on that. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:32 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands