![]() |
Originally Posted by LT Shiney Sides
(Post 2951337)
Thanks for some good info to ponder there pitchattitude. Yes, I'd be able to use that 500 hour military PIC clause. I want to be optimistic in hoping it's just going to be a short stint somewhere, but my life's luck seems to always steer me down the longest, roughest road, i'll get there, but it's never an easy path it seems.
You seem to be confirming what i'm mostly after...if i'm lucky and this is just a brief employment opportunity, is DFW (for any carrier) even a possibility in that window (hopefully < 6 months)? If not, what is likely to be the least bitter introductory experience to 121 flying? Think I had a buddy take a good 7-8 months to get to DFW with SKW, can't remember for sure though. Have not submitted to Mesa. |
Originally Posted by Cyio
(Post 2951931)
Did they ban your cr700 account?
SOLID possibility. However my direct connection in recruitment has said that we are solid in FO’s, when I asked for specifics she wouldn’t say so idk how good it is but we are having solid class sizes by the looks of it over the past 3 classes Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by UncreativeUser
(Post 2952283)
SOLID possibility.
However my direct connection in recruitment has said that we are solid in FO’s, when I asked for specifics she wouldn’t say so idk how good it is but we are having solid class sizes by the looks of it over the past 3 classes Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Anyway, I am happy we are hiring a lot, or at least what training can handle as that allows movement and movement equals flow. |
Originally Posted by Cyio
(Post 2952288)
Oh I believe that 100%, I was more pointing out this persons over the top love affair with all that is AA. Its the same derogatory tone that cr7 used.
Anyway, I am happy we are hiring a lot, or at least what training can handle as that allows movement and movement equals flow. |
Originally Posted by Cyio
(Post 2952288)
Oh I believe that 100%, I was more pointing out this persons over the top love affair with all that is AA. Its the same derogatory tone that cr7 used.
Anyway, I am happy we are hiring a lot, or at least what training can handle as that allows movement and movement equals flow. And yes, you are correct. More movement equals more flow. |
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 2952305)
Please explain.
|
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2952367)
Less incentive for the company to start throttling flow when there is ample supply of fresh blood to replace the flowing pilots.
My point is that more movement equals more movement. That movement is from other attrition. The only thing that equals more flow is more flow. Envoy has a problem with captain staffing. That is not conducive to more flow. They need to hire and upgrade a lot more to account for the attrition. |
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 2952433)
The flow has already been throttled. And the reality seems to be Envoy is expecting significant non-flow attrition. They won’t say that but that’s the only voodoo math that makes their advertising of a sub-six year flow work.
My point is that more movement equals more movement. That movement is from other attrition. The only thing that equals more flow is more flow. Envoy has a problem with captain staffing. That is not conducive to more flow. They need to hire and upgrade a lot more to account for the attrition. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2952442)
Cyio never said "more" flow.
But I still stand by my statement that movement is not the same as flow. Flow does create movement but not the other way around. |
Originally Posted by cr700
(Post 2952329)
It's disappointing to see you've become so jaded against the company. What exactly have they done to you specifically? As you can see, I am still here. I don't personally know this other poster that you associate with me however he has some very good points.
And yes, you are correct. More movement equals more flow. Cyio never said "more" flow. The flow has already been throttled. And the reality seems to be Envoy is expecting significant non-flow attrition. They won’t say that but that’s the only voodoo math that makes their advertising of a sub-six year flow work. My point is that more movement equals more movement. That movement is from other attrition. The only thing that equals more flow is more flow. Envoy has a problem with captain staffing. That is not conducive to more flow. They need to hire and upgrade a lot more to account for the attrition. True, Cyio did not, but the troll certainly jumped all over it. But I still stand by my statement that movement is not the same as flow. Flow does create movement but not the other way around. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:29 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands