Revised April Bid is Available
#121
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2019
Posts: 744
Just curious what the peanut gallery has to say now that the MEC has said that we do qualify for the stimulus grants and that our jobs are indeed protected through September.
So many experts on here. I love it when they join in their chorus of negativity only to be shot down hours later.
So many experts on here. I love it when they join in their chorus of negativity only to be shot down hours later.
#122
Banned
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Just curious what the peanut gallery has to say now that the MEC has said that we do qualify for the stimulus grants and that our jobs are indeed protected through September.
So many experts on here. I love it when they join in their chorus of negativity only to be shot down hours later.
So many experts on here. I love it when they join in their chorus of negativity only to be shot down hours later.
#123
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 213
Revised April Bid is Available
I’m not being negative, just realistic. United has announced even deeper reductions to the schedule in May and June are to be expected and that they expect the effects of the virus on passenger demand to last possibly into next year. The grants just kick the can down the road a few months and give the airlines time to figure out what is left. By October hopefully things will not still be in free fall and they can slowly put the pieces back together. XJT, like every other airline, will have an idea of staffing demands and can therefore have a better idea of how many people to furlough, and how many aircraft to either put into storage or retire. We’re all going to come out of this smaller.
We’re already small as it is...once the transitions are over from the 175->145 you don’t think UA/XJT will want to staff most, if not all of the 145’s? Assuming we make it out.
#124
Banned
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
You could get smaller too. They could decide that 50 seat jets are needed to bring back markets and you guys would be in better shape, or they could decide that now is the time to draw that fleet down and you’d be in trouble. This is unprecedented and all bets are off. I don’t know what they are going to do, but the bottom 1/3 of every airline’s seniority list should be very nervous right now.
#125
You could get smaller too. They could decide that 50 seat jets are needed to bring back markets and you guys would be in better shape, or they could decide that now is the time to draw that fleet down and you’d be in trouble. This is unprecedented and all bets are off. I don’t know what they are going to do, but the bottom 1/3 of every airline’s seniority list should be very nervous right now.
#126
Banned
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Being totally dependent on United for routes doesn’t really put you guys in a better position. United could build you up, or take everything away. I seriously doubt that either will occur. The reductions are big enough that Expressjet will share in the pain and end up with a furlough and a smaller fleet at the end of the day just like everyone else. Some airlines will take bigger hits than others, but we’re all going to get beat up in this deal.
#127
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: It's a plane and it's a seat
Posts: 950
#128
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2019
Posts: 744
Being totally dependent on United for routes doesn’t really put you guys in a better position. United could build you up, or take everything away. I seriously doubt that either will occur. The reductions are big enough that Expressjet will share in the pain and end up with a furlough and a smaller fleet at the end of the day just like everyone else. Some airlines will take bigger hits than others, but we’re all going to get beat up in this deal.
Wish I could bet you a grand on this. My take is that October is plenty of time for travel demand to recover at least somewhat. We were already so short staffed we could park about 1/3 of our planes without furloughing anyone. Your assertions may apply to many airlines, but XJT is in the unique position of having just been given more planes to fly with no staffing to fly the planes we already had. Obviously we didn’t get in this position by being a fantastic place to work, yet here we are. If XJT furloughs this entire industry is in dire straits. We have already been declared “too big to fail” as a whole. It won’t happen. Not to mention any plan to phase out 50 seat flying absolutely requires a reasonable plan to replace the lift to the markets that aircraft serves. Due to scope limits UA would end up having to use mainline aircraft to do some of it. I guess anything is possible but I don’t see it happening in such a short time frame when as you said, no one has a clue what travel demand will be in 6 months.
Perhaps you just have no idea what the current situation is at XJT, but your assertions are certainly on the extreme negative side. Not really what I would call “realistic.” At a minimum highly speculative.
#129
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 242
Just curious what the peanut gallery has to say now that the MEC has said that we do qualify for the stimulus grants and that our jobs are indeed protected through September.
So many experts on here. I love it when they join in their chorus of negativity only to be shot down hours later.
So many experts on here. I love it when they join in their chorus of negativity only to be shot down hours later.
Even Subodh has a boss. Where we end up on September 30th has yet to be determined. One thing I know for sure is that all legacy airlines want to keep some level of whipsaw in place amongst their regionals. Our block hours are changing for the worse as each day goes by (and with each email from the company). A flight that I would have used for my commute was canceled one day prior, yesterday. I have multiple legs on each pairing next month that are tagged for cancellation but without notification from the company. So, our fate is far from determined at this time.
I am fortunate so far, in that I am closer to the top of the seniority list than the bottom. If we are made smaller, I should have a job for a while. I am thankful for that. Now is not the time for bragging or a lack of humility.
#130
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 242
Wish I could bet you a grand on this. My take is that October is plenty of time for travel demand to recover at least somewhat. We were already so short staffed we could park about 1/3 of our planes without furloughing anyone. Your assertions may apply to many airlines, but XJT is in the unique position of having just been given more planes to fly with no staffing to fly the planes we already had. Obviously we didn’t get in this position by being a fantastic place to work, yet here we are. If XJT furloughs this entire industry is in dire straits. We have already been declared “too big to fail” as a whole. It won’t happen. Not to mention any plan to phase out 50 seat flying absolutely requires a reasonable plan to replace the lift to the markets that aircraft serves. Due to scope limits UA would end up having to use mainline aircraft to do some of it. I guess anything is possible but I don’t see it happening in such a short time frame when as you said, no one has a clue what travel demand will be in 6 months.
Perhaps you just have no idea what the current situation is at XJT, but your assertions are certainly on the extreme negative side. Not really what I would call “realistic.” At a minimum highly speculative.
Perhaps you just have no idea what the current situation is at XJT, but your assertions are certainly on the extreme negative side. Not really what I would call “realistic.” At a minimum highly speculative.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post