C5 Mgt Won’t hire XJT?
Is this true?
|
I don’t know. Where are you hearing this
|
Union email
Although CommutAir seems to be planning quick growth of both aircraft and bases, and we are working with their MEC to provide our pilots some sort of leg up at their airline, it is our understanding that their management team is against any direct help to our pilot group at this time. |
Originally Posted by falconkidding
(Post 3110263)
Union email
Although CommutAir seems to be planning quick growth of both aircraft and bases, and we are working with their MEC to provide our pilots some sort of leg up at their airline, it is our understanding that their management team is against any direct help to our pilot group at this time. https://i.imgur.com/a6cPf32.png |
"Management Team is against any direct help" means, at face value, that they don't want to establish any sort of flow, preferential interview, etc.
Doesn't specifically state that they don't want to hire EV alumni. There would actually be no legit business reason (and thus liability exposure) to specifically exclude EV people, especially since they have very relevant type experience (as well as "United Express Experience", which as you may recall has been used as a regional hiring criteria in the past). Time will tell how they really feel. |
My guess would be they are against incentives or guarantees. They (rightfully) realize it's a buyer's market for pilots and they have no intention of paying a dime more than what is in the current contract. They have indicated they wish to hire the most qualified applicants they can. Certainly typed and current pilots meet that standard.
They are wary (rightfully again) of having bitter pilots sabotaging the operation. The hardest thing is going to be eating this crap sandwich and still being a team player. I'm not sure I could do it so I won't be sanctimonious about it. If you interview try your best to be cheerful, appreciative and don't reveal a sense of entitlement. That will give you the best chance. |
Originally Posted by tallpilot
(Post 3110289)
My guess would be they are against incentives or guarantees. They (rightfully) realize it's a buyer's market for pilots and they have no intention of paying a dime more than what is in the current contract. They have indicated they wish to hire the most qualified applicants they can. Certainly typed and current pilots meet that standard.
They are wary (rightfully again) of having bitter pilots sabotaging the operation. The hardest thing is going to be eating this crap sandwich and still being a team player. I'm not sure I could do it so I won't be sanctimonious about it. If you interview try your best to be cheerful, appreciative and don't reveal a sense of entitlement. That will give you the best chance. |
Originally Posted by SureJetStick
(Post 3110256)
Is this true?
|
Originally Posted by JohnnyBekkestad
(Post 3110306)
Also there might be problems with different pay scales
|
"Direct help" sounds like preferential treatment. Management isn't against hiring XJT pilots. My understanding is C5 is giving UAL and UAX pilots preferential interviews but that's it.
|
Go work for a respectable company. Lowe’s, Home Depot, heck, Chick-Fil-A....respectable? C5 ain’t it.
|
Originally Posted by Puck Hawg
(Post 3110387)
Go work for a respectable company. Lowe’s, Home Depot, heck, Chick-Fil-A....respectable? C5 ain’t it.
|
Originally Posted by Hou757
(Post 3110407)
Totally agree! Several of our folks went there over the past several years. Some like it and are happy but most that I've spoken to say the training department is terrible, lousy folks running the company and many felt that they were lied to by those in their recruiting department. Hold out and jobs at more respectable regionals/lcc's will open up in due time.
|
Originally Posted by terks43
(Post 3110434)
Just so you are aware, “due time” is going to be 3-5 years. Absolutely no one is going to be hiring for a very long time in the 121 world.
|
By "direct help", they mean any sort of staple or seniority list integration. Why? Because that would most likely be facilitated by ALPA and those that it would help most are the very pilots they don't want in their ranks. Not all, but most of these guys/gals did nothing but complain about having to fly the 145 after they lost the CRJ flying for Delta, then United, and finally the 175 flying for EV. C5 is a relatively junior airline and most of the people they are likely trying to keep out have tons of experience at the regional level, but bring along terrible attitudes and many will continue complaining no matter where they go. Who at C5 wants to listen to stories about how much better the CRJ is or how much better their old contract was, every day, on every leg of a four day trip?
|
C5 guy here.
Our current MOU prohibits the company from providing any hiring incentives (bonuses) to all new hires effective October 1. That is not a slam to EV pilots...like tallpilot said it's a reflection of the new reality. There are rumors of a hiring priority. Haven't seen it in print but it seems appropriate. ExpressJet, TSA and other 145 typed pilots are naturally at the top of that list, followed by other UAX carriers and aviate participants. So the opportunity is yours to lose. That said, there are also rumors that EV pilots already here are likely to help HR weed out the troublemakers, so if that aptly describes you, I wouldn't expect a call back. Personally, if you can tolerate the crummy pay and work rules like everyone else over at C5, I encourage you to apply. If, however, you're going to suggest stocking the plumbing aisle at the Depot is more respectful than working for us or you're just going to put on a smiley face for the interview and then spend every trip moaning about your situation, please stay away. I enjoy my job precisely because the people are great, and the last thing I want to do is go to work with a bunch of complainers. |
Originally Posted by tallpilot
(Post 3110289)
My guess would be they are against incentives or guarantees. They (rightfully) realize it's a buyer's market for pilots and they have no intention of paying a dime more than what is in the current contract. They have indicated they wish to hire the most qualified applicants they can. Certainly typed and current pilots meet that standard.
They are wary (rightfully again) of having bitter pilots sabotaging the operation. The hardest thing is going to be eating this crap sandwich and still being a team player. I'm not sure I could do it so I won't be sanctimonious about it. If you interview try your best to be cheerful, appreciative and don't reveal a sense of entitlement. That will give you the best chance. |
Originally Posted by legacysaretough
(Post 3111378)
Most of our BITTER pilots come from the CRJ side of ASA
|
Originally Posted by legacysaretough
(Post 3111378)
Most of our BITTER pilots come from the CRJ side of ASA
|
Originally Posted by piloto2
(Post 3111453)
Let me fix that for you: Most of your pilots who THINK they are better come from the ASA/CRJ side. They are also the ones who complain the most!
Originally Posted by legacysaretough
(Post 3111372)
I ABSOLUTELY guarantee you, NO former ASA pilot has applied! :eek: (they all HATE the 145, despite the fact it keeps them employed)
|
Your reading comprehension SUCKS! BITTER was the word....not BETTER. And the guy who made the snarky 145 comment is clearly not an ASA guy.
|
Originally Posted by ReadOnly7
(Post 3113466)
Your reading comprehension SUCKS! BITTER was the word....not BETTER. And the guy who made the snarky 145 comment is clearly not an ASA guy.
|
Originally Posted by legacysaretough
(Post 3113964)
CLEARLY......your right
|
Originally Posted by legacysaretough
(Post 3113964)
CLEARLY......your right
|
Originally Posted by CLE to IAH
(Post 3114425)
what are you trying to say here??
i was affirming that guys post about not being an original crj guy CLEARLY im not a crj guy |
......
Wow! Not gonna GIVE you anything.
If there EVER was a case for a national seniority list, this and the COMPASS/TSA debacle is it. wouldn't be GIVING me a dam thing, I'd ratherTAKE it. Or all those years and all that experience means NOTHING. |
Originally Posted by Boxhound
(Post 3116416)
Wow! Not gonna GIVE you anything.
If there EVER was a case for a national seniority list, this and the COMPASS/TSA debacle is it. wouldn't be GIVING me a dam thing, I'd ratherTAKE it. Or all those years and all that experience means NOTHING. |
The problem with a master list for all USA pilots (which I think is what's suggested) is that if your company goes bust, will another company hire you and pay you at the seniority you had previously? I doubt it.
I can imagine airline apps have a "national seniority number" box. The junior guys may get jobs at other carriers but high seniority people will either be ignored or only hired in extreme circumstances. |
Originally Posted by climb150
(Post 3116570)
The problem with a master list for all USA pilots (which I think is what's suggested) is that if your company goes bust, will another company hire you and pay you at the seniority you had previously? I doubt it.
I can imagine airline apps have a "national seniority number" box. The junior guys may get jobs at other carriers but high seniority people will either be ignored or only hired in extreme circumstances. |
The national seniority list thing is amusing to talk about, and has been talked about for as long as I've been around. And it's something that will never happen.
|
Originally Posted by climb150
(Post 3116570)
The problem with a master list for all USA pilots (which I think is what's suggested) is that if your company goes bust, will another company hire you and pay you at the seniority you had previously? I doubt it.
I can imagine airline apps have a "national seniority number" box. The junior guys may get jobs at other carriers but high seniority people will either be ignored or only hired in extreme circumstances. It is heartbreaking to start over but much of that can be fixed by reducing the extreme disparity between the bottom and the top. It is only the Ponzi scheme nature of the system that causes so much heartburn. The current situation should help. Captains who thought they had a safe seat might want to vote for higher FO pay now. Pilots who thought they would never see reserve again might want to vote for better reserve work rules now. Reducing the huge differences between aircraft types would have the side benefit of reducing the ridiculous number of training events displacements cause. |
I don’t think a national list would work, but pay programs that allow for some higher pay based on experience should be at all carriers. OO will pay up to 10 years of prior experience
|
Originally Posted by JohnnyBekkestad
(Post 3116739)
I don’t think a national list would work, but pay programs that allow for some higher pay based on experience should be at all carriers. OO will pay up to 10 years of prior experience
|
Originally Posted by pangolin
(Post 3116761)
Is OO still offering that in the current environment? Doubtful.
|
This specifically screws over expressjet pilots who have already been hired at united through the United Aviate program. Since XJT is going out of business, these pilots will need to get their 1,000 hours or whatever is required at another United Express carrier. Making it harder for these guys and gals to get hired at Commutair is limiting their ability to do so.
|
Originally Posted by Turbine
(Post 3116796)
This specifically screws over expressjet pilots who have already been hired at united through the United Aviate program. Since XJT is going out of business, these pilots will need to get their 1,000 hours or whatever is required at another United Express carrier. Making it harder for these guys and gals to get hired at Commutair is limiting their ability to do so.
|
Originally Posted by Turbine
(Post 3116796)
This specifically screws over expressjet pilots who have already been hired at united through the United Aviate program. Since XJT is going out of business, these pilots will need to get their 1,000 hours or whatever is required at another United Express carrier. Making it harder for these guys and gals to get hired at Commutair is limiting their ability to do so.
"Current plan is for 36 new hire FOs and a net of 72 pilot positions by end of the year. 8 former C5ers have already been interviewed or otherwise expressed an interest in returning under LOA 3 and these internal interviews are ongoing. External pilot interviews will begin mid-September. Former C5ers, TSA, ExpressJet, or other UAX carrier pilots with a 145 type will be hired preferentially." Nobody is making it harder for anyone to get hired at CommutAir. Actually, the hiring process at CommutAir is anything but "hard". Please stop with the nonsense that you posted. |
Originally Posted by ReadOnly7
(Post 3116805)
Attitude at the interview will make all the difference.
For some, it is already too late. For others, they get an advantage. |
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3116599)
Another way to look at a national seniority list. If another airline failed, would others want those pilots coming to their airline in seniority order and bumping them down? As an example, would other regionals like it if the very senior pilots from XJT went to their company and took the senior slots? I doubt it. We all like to talk about industry unity until it affects us in a bad way, then all bets are off. A national seniority list is good from the prospective of people working for a failing company, it’s bad for the rest.
Your neighbor divorces his wife and leaves her with nothing. And in order to prevent her kids from starving, you are now forced to marry her and take in all her 5 kids. Doesn’t get anymore socialist then that. 😂 |
Originally Posted by Xelectro
(Post 3117076)
This is equivalent to this:
Your neighbor divorces his wife and leaves her with nothing. And in order to prevent her kids from starving, you are now forced to marry her and take in all her 5 kids. Doesn’t get anymore socialist then that. 😂 |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:11 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands