Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   FedEx (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/fedex/)
-   -   MD-11 Training (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/fedex/109130-md-11-training.html)

Carl Spackler 11-04-2017 04:58 PM

MD-11 Training
 
Sorry for the intrusion from a Delta (Northwest) puke but I have a question about FDX MD11 training. One of our newer guys recently quit to go to FDX. He reported that training was incredible compared to Delta and that MD11 training was just under a 60 day footprint for initial. The super-defensive among the Deltoids are saying that's because of the MD11 accidents and that the FAA has mandated that long of a footprint. Sounds like BS to me because it wouldn't take that much extra to understand that the MD11 is tail-power limited when slow and in the flare. Appreciate the facts about MD11 training straight from the source.

Carl

Huck 11-04-2017 06:19 PM

I have actually attended MD-11 school at both Delta and Fedex.

It was like night and day, they were so different.

But Fedex covered many more subjects - MD10 differences, HUD/EFVS, International ops, etc....

MaydayMark 11-04-2017 06:39 PM

I'm calling BS on the mandatory extra FAA training. I've been on the MD-11 for most of the past 23 years. I've seen various versions of upset recovery training, bounced landing training & International training

The MD-11 landing characteristics are unique. I'd say it's more difficult to land consistently (tougher than the DC-10, 747 or 727). Quite frankly I think the MD-11 lands more like a 727-200 than a DC-10.

All-in-all it's a great airplane. I enjoyed flying it very much. Sadly the greater efficiency of the 777 will replace the MD-11's one day.

https://www.amazingjokes.com/img/201...cc_Correct.jpg

HoursHore 11-04-2017 07:05 PM

There's 35 training days with 16 scheduled days off interspersed. So yes it's pretty long. But it was this long 12 years ago too, so I don't think the accidents or faa made it that way.

KnightFlyer 11-04-2017 07:06 PM

Training Footprints of all the fleets are very similar in length.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Carl Spackler 11-04-2017 07:49 PM

Thanks everyone, I didn't think this sounded right. Appreciate the responses.

Carl

cougar 11-04-2017 08:37 PM

An FAA mandated training footprint would be antithetical to the principles of AQP, assuming FDX is AQP.

Sluggo_63 11-05-2017 02:47 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 2460593)
He reported that training was incredible compared to Delta

Incredible in what way? Incredibly long? Incredibly inadequate? Incredibly good?

Carl Spackler 11-05-2017 04:13 AM


Originally Posted by Sluggo_63 (Post 2460697)
Incredible in what way? Incredibly long? Incredibly inadequate? Incredibly good?

Incredibly good and had him very well prepared to fly the line.

badflaps 11-05-2017 05:09 AM

Delta ground schools have never won any awards.

Low Flyin 11-05-2017 06:36 AM

Is Fedex AQP?

Nightflyer 11-05-2017 06:58 AM

Yes, FedEx is AQP.

Adlerdriver 11-05-2017 09:59 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 2460593)
tail-power limited when slow and in the flare.

:confused: Still doing some head scratching over this statement. Two MD-11 initials (FedEx and an ACMI) and I’m pretty sure I never heard those 9 words in that order said during either one.

dckozak 11-05-2017 01:40 PM


Originally Posted by Adlerdriver (Post 2460862)
:confused: Still doing some head scratching over this statement. Two MD-11 initials (FedEx and an ACMI) and I’m pretty sure I never heard those 9 words in that order said during either one.

My guess is this was Delta speak for something related to LSAS.

When I went through Initial in 2001, it was too long. The good news was whatever they were doing years earlier that created a high percentage of failures had been changed. It does seem that MD11 training requires constant revision and changes. I do think they believe that they have put the dumber portion of our crew force in the Mad Dog. How else can you explain our group being given a One, Two, Three on how to land an airplane?? :eek: Not going to share the document here, but for those who haven't seen it, I'll share number three, "don't forget to flare"..... Thanks for the advice!!

5millionaire 11-06-2017 06:32 AM


Originally Posted by dckozak (Post 2460948)
My guess is this was Delta speak for something related to LSAS.

When I went through Initial in 2001, it was too long. The good news was whatever they were doing years earlier that created a high percentage of failures had been changed. It does seem that MD11 training requires constant revision and changes. I do think they believe that they have put the dumber portion of our crew force in the Mad Dog. How else can you explain our group being given a One, Two, Three on how to land an airplane?? :eek: Not going to share the document here, but for those who haven't seen it, I'll share number three, "don't forget to flare"..... Thanks for the advice!!

When the majority of new MD pilots didn’t flare in their last airplane...they may need the advice!

contrails 11-06-2017 02:57 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 2460716)
Incredibly good and had him very well prepared to fly the line.

You mean they didn't have to teach themselves the airplane at home on time off?

The Walrus 11-06-2017 03:57 PM


Originally Posted by 5millionaire (Post 2461192)
When the majority of new MD pilots didn’t flare in their last airplane...they may need the advice!

Must have been Navy.

Adlerdriver 11-06-2017 04:02 PM


Originally Posted by The Walrus (Post 2461516)
Must have been Navy.

Not much gets past you, eh? :D

filejw 11-06-2017 04:17 PM


Originally Posted by badflaps (Post 2460738)
Delta ground schools have never won any awards.

Especially seeing day one is a review and day two is the systems val. There is no more ground school at DAL its memory stick unless they have changed things in the last 10 months.

Learning Objectives Document is basically self taught.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:14 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands