Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
How's our A Fund Doing?  10 year History >

How's our A Fund Doing? 10 year History

Search
Notices

How's our A Fund Doing? 10 year History

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2018, 06:54 AM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
DLax85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,191
Default

Originally Posted by kronan View Post
Salty-the thinking is Negotiate it Once and be done for ever. As I understand the UPS FDA option, it's renegotiated every contract. Payout option is roughly 75% of the Captain FDA value for FOs, and maxes out at 30 YOS.

Tentative VB proposal is unlimited YOS...FedEx has had the odd 28-early 30s hire.
And a predictable funding requirement, with the safety valve of a Reduced Pension Assets requirement in Bear markets\severe economic downturns.
As proposed, there's a 2% floor to Pension Benefits.

As has been discussed, that 2% floor is NOT the equivalent of a 2% FAE.
But, as has been Modeled with the Actual Market returns from 99-2016 and then an assumed return equal to the targeted rate of 5% it is superior to our Current A plan.

As Compared to our Current 130k Pension Plan-returned a benefit 31% better for a 25 YOS new hire and a benefit 3% better for a 15 YOS new hire

The Best Outcome would be modifying our A plan. Tying it to IRS Qualified A plan limits which would result in a 220k Pension which would be a 70% improvement over our Current 130 A plan. And, restoring it to a similar value as the Pension created in CBA 99
Here we go, the union rolls out one model, based on one set of data, and the plan is deemed superior.

Everyone, please learn more about “sensitivity analysis” as it relates to modeling

Please independently research “forecast” returns vs “historical” returns.

Additionally (and VERY importantly) did the model above have an “investment cap” - which is a key portion of establishing a “stabilization fund”?

The answer is “No”

In their first “white board” video the union talked about the possibility of a “stabilization fund” in order to offset concerns about large market downturns. The video made a rederence to a notional 10% Cap.

However, when they rolled out their model to show (tout) the above mentioned benefits, the “investment cap” was NOT included

Why?

It would have clearly truncated the “really good years” during this time period and the results would not have been nearly as favorable.

The 15 year guy may not even have been better off. (...most likely he wasn’t - hence, “...let’s NOT include the cap in this model”)

Questions:

Has the “expected upgrade timeline” used been revealed?

Has the assumed “equity/fixed income allocation” been revealed?

(It appears to be 50/50)

Have the index’s for both the equity & fixed income been revealed?

(It appears to be the S&P500, but no word on fixed income benchmark)

Model assumptions and inputs matter! Which circles me back to “sensitivity analysis”.

Research broadly and think critically!

In Unity & Transparency,

DLax
DLax85 is offline  
Old 05-14-2018, 08:21 AM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: Two Wheeler FrontSeat
Posts: 1,162
Default

Originally Posted by kronan View Post
Salty-the thinking is Negotiate it Once and be done for ever. As I understand the UPS FDA option, it's renegotiated every contract. Payout option is roughly 75% of the Captain FDA value for FOs, and maxes out at 30 YOS.

Tentative VB proposal is unlimited YOS...FedEx has had the odd 28-early 30s hire.
And a predictable funding requirement, with the safety valve of a Reduced Pension Assets requirement in Bear markets\severe economic downturns.
As proposed, there's a 2% floor to Pension Benefits.

As has been discussed, that 2% floor is NOT the equivalent of a 2% FAE.
But, as has been Modeled with the Actual Market returns from 99-2016 and then an assumed return equal to the targeted rate of 5% it is superior to our Current A plan.

As Compared to our Current 130k Pension Plan-returned a benefit 31% better for a 25 YOS new hire and a benefit 3% better for a 15 YOS new hire

The Best Outcome would be modifying our A plan. Tying it to IRS Qualified A plan limits which would result in a 220k Pension which would be a 70% improvement over our Current 130 A plan. And, restoring it to a similar value as the Pension created in CBA 99
Dude where do you come up with these numbers? They are not guaranteed, the 130k is guaranteed. You must be one of these union guys trying to sell this POS
StarClipper is offline  
Old 05-14-2018, 08:50 AM
  #73  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 56
Default

Retirees Face A "Pension Crisis" Of Their Own | RIA

Please read to understand historical returns (and relationship to lofty valuations).

Cheiron is selling a product. The product must look good to sell...

What happens if there are 5 years of no return or negative returns? Does the hurdle rate “reset” each year? Imagine after 3 negative return years, what return would be needed to get back to hurdle rate? These questions are endless, not answered or negotiated yet, and we already have a B fund with other personal investments that are beholden to market risk. Why voluntarily subject ourselves to market risk?
FastBurner is offline  
Old 05-16-2018, 10:40 AM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: Two Wheeler FrontSeat
Posts: 1,162
Default

So focus meeting scheduled for IND tomorrow, why is the registration limited to 15 pilots? Why are they still trying to sell this POS VB Plan?
StarClipper is offline  
Old 05-16-2018, 02:29 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,988
Default

Originally Posted by StarClipper View Post
So focus meeting scheduled for IND tomorrow, why is the registration limited to 15 pilots? Why are they still trying to sell this POS VB Plan?
15 is the most the feel they can “re-educate” effectively at one time. Any more and the group might get unruly and start asking “political” or pointed questions that can’t be easily deflected.
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 05-16-2018, 05:25 PM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: Two Wheeler FrontSeat
Posts: 1,162
Default

Dear Mr PM this tutorial video wasn’t helpful at all, it is a hard sell of that POS. Funny how they didn’t show how those with 25+ yrs on property would fair out. No freeze on the A Plan please. Personally a 60% chance of the payout increasing 153K is not worth the 40% risk. These guys need to get out of office now.

Lots of talk about what you potentially could earn, no mention of the risk involved and what could be loss.
StarClipper is offline  
Old 05-16-2018, 06:22 PM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
DLax85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,191
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver View Post
15 is the most the feel they can “re-educate” effectively at one time. Any more and the group might get unruly and start asking “political” or pointed questions that can’t be easily deflected.
Focus groups are what companies and political parties use when they want to "test out" a groups opinion of a new product, a new project, a new political idea.

They are not meant to educate the user, buyer or customer.

It's meant for the producer of the product, so they can learn better about how to re-package, and better market, so they can better sell the product or idea.

Did I miss the results of the phone survey?? ....which also was selective in nature.

Why wasn't the survey put on-line, so everyone could log-in and respond?

Why are the focus groups limited to such small numbers?

Why were the focus groups in MEM held during day hub turns?

Where's the use of technology, where pilots can log-in live, listen to the focus group presentations, and ask questions remotely?

Why haven't all the questions submitted to the company's retirement Q&A website been answered and posted?

All very disconcerting.
DLax85 is offline  
Old 05-16-2018, 06:46 PM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: Two Wheeler FrontSeat
Posts: 1,162
Default

When that crap first started and I called it the way I saw it “a sales job” quite a few on here were quick to jump to the unions defense. Some say at least listen to what they have to say. After 2015 CBA I see FDX ALPA as a sales agency
StarClipper is offline  
Old 05-17-2018, 05:09 AM
  #79  
Bourgeoisie
 
MEMFO4Ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 787 SO
Posts: 616
Default

I sure hope all you experts step up to the plate and volunteer since you can waive a magic wand and make the company give us something we know deep down they will never accept. But please keep talking. At a minimum it gives us something to read while the A plan value continues to fall and we do nothing. Not to worry though, we all know you will not.

Or is it time to talk about all that leverage we have, again.
MEMFO4Ever is offline  
Old 05-17-2018, 07:29 AM
  #80  
Proponent of Hysteria
 
FXDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 3B
Posts: 1,052
Default

Originally Posted by MEMFO4Ever View Post
I sure hope all you experts step up to the plate and volunteer since you can waive a magic wand and make the company give us something we know deep down they will never accept. But please keep talking. At a minimum it gives us something to read while the A plan value continues to fall and we do nothing. Not to worry though, we all know you will not.

Or is it time to talk about all that leverage we have, again.
The A plan value isn't "falling". Some folks have maximized their benefit under the plan and accrued a fixed benefit. Many of us still have a lot to gain under the current plan and don't want to "relieve the company of the liability" by taking on the market risk of the investment.
FXDX is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
chritz1179
Hiring News
287
03-11-2014 05:44 PM
tcaphou
Fractional
8
02-25-2008 11:38 AM
cloudkicker1981
Hiring News
27
10-22-2006 12:35 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
07-09-2005 09:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices