Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
Things you LOVE about FedEx >

Things you LOVE about FedEx

Search
Notices

Things you LOVE about FedEx

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-2019, 01:19 AM
  #131  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,988
Default

Originally Posted by FXLAX View Post
Status quo simply means that employees cannot seek self-help
Exactly.
Guess what is considered self help and has been ruled illegal job actions violating status quo in past labor disputes?
Coordinated union actions like:
Sick outs
Mx write up campaigns
Working to rule
Opting to not pick up overtime if that’s been normal Ops up to entering section 6

Hmm,,,, that last one sounds a lot like restricting M/U

Check out the ruling against Atlas pilots just this year:
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-r...-Slowdown.html

No one is going to put a provision in a CBA that allows immediate commencement of self help measures at the start of negotiations. It simply defies common sense and the whole concept of the RLA negotiation process. I appreciate your optimism, but there’s a limit where that just passes into fantasy.
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 12-28-2019, 04:22 AM
  #132  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,820
Default

Originally Posted by FXLAX View Post
You said I was wrong. Since you are making that claim, show me how I’m wrong.

I’ve read the relevant sections of the RLA before. But I went back and read it again just to make sure I wasn’t remembering wrong. Here is a link to the RLA. Show me where in the law does it restrict either party to negotiate anything in particular, much less something as specific as what provisions take effect during section 6 negotiations?

https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-4...-sect-152.html

https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-4...-sect-156.html




Where did you hear or read this?

Status quo simply means that employees cannot seek self-help and the employer cannot unilaterally change rates of pay or working conditions. Well, if one of the working conditions doesn’t allow overtime during negotiations, then prohibiting it during negotiations wouldn’t violate status quo.
You shouldn't let a lawyer fly your airplane and you shouldn't get legal advice from a pilot.

Just because the RLA doesn't specifically say what can be negotiated and what can't doesn't mean that you can add language that would be considered illegal.
pinseeker is offline  
Old 12-28-2019, 10:55 AM
  #133  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 857
Default

Originally Posted by pinseeker View Post
You shouldn't let a lawyer fly your airplane and you shouldn't get legal advice from a pilot.

Just because the RLA doesn't specifically say what can be negotiated and what can't doesn't mean that you can add language that would be considered illegal.
Agreed.
...
sweetholyjesus is offline  
Old 12-29-2019, 01:26 PM
  #134  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,099
Default Things you LOVE about FedEx

Originally Posted by pinseeker View Post
You shouldn't let a lawyer fly your airplane and you shouldn't get legal advice from a pilot.



Just because the RLA doesn't specifically say what can be negotiated and what can't doesn't mean that you can add language that would be considered illegal.

So in other words, you’ve got nothing. I provided the actual law. You disagree. So show me the court opinion, federal regulation, other law, etc that says other than what I’ve pointed out in the RLA itself. Where did you hear this or read this? Where? Show me!

As soon as you do, I will admit I was wrong.

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver View Post
Exactly.

Guess what is considered self help and has been ruled illegal job actions violating status quo in past labor disputes?

Coordinated union actions like:

Sick outs

Mx write up campaigns

Working to rule

Opting to not pick up overtime if that’s been normal Ops up to entering section 6



Hmm,,,, that last one sounds a lot like restricting M/U



Check out the ruling against Atlas pilots just this year:

https://www.globenewswire.com/news-r...-Slowdown.html



No one is going to put a provision in a CBA that allows immediate commencement of self help measures at the start of negotiations. It simply defies common sense and the whole concept of the RLA negotiation process. I appreciate your optimism, but there’s a limit where that just passes into fantasy.

No one is arguing any of that. What I’m saying is that having a work rule negotiated that says no overtime pick up by pilots during negotiations is not violating status quo. This is not a complex concept. That is, if something is in the contract, it’s not violating status quo by complying with it. That is common sense.

Originally Posted by Nightflyer View Post
Doesn't UPS have a requirement in their contract that says if the company goes past the amendable date, they get a 3% raise each year on the anniversary?



I think someone told me they do.



If so, we need to get that.



We are getting pennies on the dollar from the signing bonus, so the company always seems to drag it out at least 2 years late, making a 6 year contract, in reality, an 8 year contract.

Air wisconsin has had that in their contract for over ten years. And their new contract they just ratified a couple of weeks ago has retained that exact language.
FXLAX is offline  
Old 12-29-2019, 03:39 PM
  #135  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,820
Default

Originally Posted by FXLAX View Post
So in other words, you’ve got nothing. I provided the actual law. You disagree. So show me the court opinion, federal regulation, other law, etc that says other than what I’ve pointed out in the RLA itself. Where did you hear this or read this? Where? Show me!

As soon as you do, I will admit I was wrong.
Lay off the coffee dude. People who are in the profession of interpreting the law, you know, lawyers, disagree all the time. That’s why they go to court. You said that the RLA doesn’t say what you can and can’t negotiate. I simply pointed out that that doesn’t give you permission to include items that are illegal. Whether it’s legal or not is up to the courts to decide if it ever got that far.

Show me something more concrete than your interpretation of the RLA. Show me a court ruling that says you can have rules in the contract that only apply while in section 6. Show me a contract that has special work rules that are only applicable during section 6. If you can’t do that, show my your law degree and what tell me what state you are licensed to practice law and what type of law you practice, and I will weigh your opinion more than that of Adler.

Contract law and the RLA can be tricky. I have read the RLA, and tend to agree with Adler. Sorry to burst your bubble.
pinseeker is offline  
Old 12-29-2019, 05:21 PM
  #136  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bleedairpacks's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: MD11 CA (rtd.)
Posts: 318
Default

Best job I ever had in the world was trolling the friendly skies in an MD-11.
bleedairpacks is offline  
Old 12-29-2019, 06:22 PM
  #137  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,099
Default Things you LOVE about FedEx

Originally Posted by pinseeker View Post
Lay off the coffee dude. People who are in the profession of interpreting the law, you know, lawyers, disagree all the time. That’s why they go to court. You said that the RLA doesn’t say what you can and can’t negotiate. I simply pointed out that that doesn’t give you permission to include items that are illegal. Whether it’s legal or not is up to the courts to decide if it ever got that far.



Show me something more concrete than your interpretation of the RLA. Show me a court ruling that says you can have rules in the contract that only apply while in section 6. Show me a contract that has special work rules that are only applicable during section 6. If you can’t do that, show my your law degree and what tell me what state you are licensed to practice law and what type of law you practice, and I will weigh your opinion more than that of Adler.



Contract law and the RLA can be tricky. I have read the RLA, and tend to agree with Adler. Sorry to burst your bubble.

I simply said the RLA doesn’t prevent negotiating specific contract terms, in this case, overtime during negotiations. I provided links to the RLA. So it’s up to anyone trying to say that something that isn’t in the law is what current practice is. So show me how something that isn’t in the law, lawful. Show me a legal interpretation from the NMB, or a court opinion, or a regulation. I’m simply saying the RLA doesn’t prevent what you say it prevents and showed you how that is fact. You say that simply because it doesn’t say you can’t, means you can’t. So where did you hear that? Where did you read it? Where?

Simply saying that just because there isn’t a contract with certain language, doesn’t mean it’s illegal. More than likely it means that it’s too costly to attain.

Until then, I’ll continue to say, you’ve got nothing, like Alder. When you do, I’ll admit I’m wrong. Which I will freely admit it can happen...again.
FXLAX is offline  
Old 12-30-2019, 03:38 AM
  #138  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,820
Default

Originally Posted by FXLAX View Post
I simply said the RLA doesn’t prevent negotiating specific contract terms, in this case, overtime during negotiations. I provided links to the RLA. So it’s up to anyone trying to say that something that isn’t in the law is what current practice is. So show me how something that isn’t in the law, lawful. Show me a legal interpretation from the NMB, or a court opinion, or a regulation. I’m simply saying the RLA doesn’t prevent what you say it prevents and showed you how that is fact. You say that simply because it doesn’t say you can’t, means you can’t. So where did you hear that? Where did you read it? Where?

Simply saying that just because there isn’t a contract with certain language, doesn’t mean it’s illegal. More than likely it means that it’s too costly to attain.

Until then, I’ll continue to say, you’ve got nothing, like Alder. When you do, I’ll admit I’m wrong. Which I will freely admit it can happen...again.
You haven’t shown anything other than a link to the RLA and what you think it means. So you have nothing either except an opinion.

I’ll take legal advice from you when you let me handle your financial advice. Until then, I’ll stick to flying airplanes and thinking that you are wrong.
pinseeker is offline  
Old 12-30-2019, 11:06 AM
  #139  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD11 Captain
Posts: 364
Default

One thing I love about FedEx is how tough and argumentative the pilots are on semi-anonymous forums. But in person they’re just mostly fat, balding dudes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
hoya saxa is offline  
Old 12-30-2019, 12:54 PM
  #140  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 279
Default

Originally Posted by hoya saxa View Post
One thing I love about FedEx is how tough and argumentative the pilots are on semi-anonymous forums. But in person they’re just mostly fat, balding dudes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We don’t have a monopoly there, You can get that at any airline.
gatorhater is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SWAjet
Major
8
01-01-2020 12:25 PM
Raptor
FedEx
1
10-02-2015 08:55 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
6
10-02-2008 10:46 PM
Browntail
Cargo
8
08-01-2008 05:52 PM
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
Cargo
22
06-04-2008 01:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices