Overrun In Mumbai
08-09-2020, 01:47 PM
#5
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2019
Posts: 80
[QUOTE=ClutchCargo;3107387]No errors in the flight
No Errors You Are Joking Right?
Metar shows light rain and gusty tail wind
overran 30’
poor landing assessment
exceeded tailwind 10kt limit for landing
flight was down to limits
wet runway, not grooved
displaced thresholds
only 7048’
downslope runway
hydroplaned prevention actions not taken
possibly landing fast
lots of rubber deposits on runway to consider
did they consider alternatives?
lots of errors to learn from
https://youtu.be/49FwcyjDDb0
No Errors You Are Joking Right?
Metar shows light rain and gusty tail wind
overran 30’
poor landing assessment
exceeded tailwind 10kt limit for landing
flight was down to limits
wet runway, not grooved
displaced thresholds
only 7048’
downslope runway
hydroplaned prevention actions not taken
possibly landing fast
lots of rubber deposits on runway to consider
did they consider alternatives?
lots of errors to learn from
https://youtu.be/49FwcyjDDb0
08-09-2020, 02:11 PM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,912
[QUOTE=Laminar;3107431]
Sounds like you’ve got it all figured out. Didn’t realize you’re part of the FED EX ASAP committee. Can you share with this forum your findings of your TAP ROOT Study as how you came up with your hypothesis?
Originally Posted by ClutchCargo
No errors in the flight
No Errors You Are Joking Right?
Metar shows light rain and gusty tail wind
overran 30’
poor landing assessment
exceeded tailwind 10kt limit for landing
flight was down to limits
wet runway, not grooved
displaced thresholds
only 7048’
downslope runway
hydroplaned prevention actions not taken
possibly landing fast
lots of rubber deposits on runway to consider
did they consider alternatives?
lots of errors to learn from
https://youtu.be/49FwcyjDDb0
No Errors You Are Joking Right?
Metar shows light rain and gusty tail wind
overran 30’
poor landing assessment
exceeded tailwind 10kt limit for landing
flight was down to limits
wet runway, not grooved
displaced thresholds
only 7048’
downslope runway
hydroplaned prevention actions not taken
possibly landing fast
lots of rubber deposits on runway to consider
did they consider alternatives?
lots of errors to learn from
https://youtu.be/49FwcyjDDb0
08-09-2020, 02:19 PM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 163
[QUOTE=captjns;3107444]
Sounds like you’ve got it all figured out. Didn’t realize you’re part of the FED EX ASAP committee. Can you share with this forum your findings of your TAP ROOT Study as how you came up with your hypothesis?
Probably didn't make it through the interview and is still a little sour.
Originally Posted by Laminar
Sounds like you’ve got it all figured out. Didn’t realize you’re part of the FED EX ASAP committee. Can you share with this forum your findings of your TAP ROOT Study as how you came up with your hypothesis?
08-09-2020, 03:34 PM
#8
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2019
Posts: 80
[QUOTE=BusBoy88;3107450]
Probably didn't make it through the interview and is still a little sour.
the video is old and wondering if you were sent a message from your training department ... thus an update
flying rubber dog **** is not my thing and no part 117 is another
Originally Posted by captjns
Probably didn't make it through the interview and is still a little sour.
flying rubber dog **** is not my thing and no part 117 is another
08-09-2020, 04:05 PM
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 163
[QUOTE=Laminar;3107482]
the video is old and wondering if you were sent a message from your training department ... thus an update
flying rubber dog **** is not my thing and no part 117 is another
LOL. You sure seemed to be interested last summer when you were asking a lot of questions about FDX. But tell yourself whatever you need to in order to satisfy your delicate ego.
Originally Posted by BusBoy88
the video is old and wondering if you were sent a message from your training department ... thus an update
flying rubber dog **** is not my thing and no part 117 is another
08-09-2020, 04:50 PM
#10
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2019
Posts: 80
[QUOTE=BusBoy88;3107494]
LOL. You sure seemed to be interested last summer when you were asking a lot of questions about FDX. But tell yourself whatever you need to in order to satisfy your delicate ego.
I guess we are not going to quaterback this one, were you flying it. Yikes
Originally Posted by Laminar
LOL. You sure seemed to be interested last summer when you were asking a lot of questions about FDX. But tell yourself whatever you need to in order to satisfy your delicate ego.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
