Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   FedEx (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/fedex/)
-   -   Vaccine Stance (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/fedex/134786-vaccine-stance.html)

ZapBrannigan 09-14-2021 03:55 AM

Well.. condoms aren't 100% protective but that doesn't mean you say "screw it!" and raw dog a hooker...

urinmyseat 09-14-2021 04:43 AM

[QUOTE=Meat Fighter;3294835]Just to clarify.

We have a shot that....

Doesn't prevent transmission.

Doesn't prevent getting COVID.

Doesn't inoculate against the virus.

Need to get a new one every 5 months.

Has no long term safety profile.

And is labeled as the exit metric for this modern rendition of 1984???

***But if you take vitamins, supplement your own immune system, live a healthy life, and take an early treatment protocol for a virus you have a 99.997 chance of surviving you're labeled by the government as a selfish lunatic.

This isn't about science or medicine, this is cultish behavior.


Ding, ding, ding, we have a winner! All you folks who know more than the rest of us, and feel the superior need to chastise those who question... What part of the above list is false?

HPIC 09-14-2021 05:02 AM


Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan (Post 3294846)
Well.. condoms aren't 100% protective but that doesn't mean you say "screw it!" and raw dog a hooker...

Wait a second…I was told what happens in Wan Chai stays in Wan Chai! :D

ClncClarence 09-14-2021 05:02 AM


Originally Posted by urinmyseat (Post 3294866)
What part of the above list is false?

I’ll take a stab at a few that are at least misleading or lack nuance, which is basically all of them.


Originally Posted by urinmyseat (Post 3294866)
Just to clarify.

We have a shot that....

Doesn't prevent transmission.

Doesn't prevent getting COVID.

Doesn't inoculate against the virus.

Literally nobody claims it does any of these things. Why do you people treat this as a binary thing? It’s not an ‘it works or it doesn’t’ proposition. The vaccines are highly effective at mitigating both the spread of the virus and the severe effects for those who do become infected. That is a fact.


Originally Posted by urinmyseat (Post 3294866)
Need to get a new one every 5 months.

There is still a great deal of debate about the need for boosters at the FDA and nobody has suggested needing one after only five months.

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/13/covi...-conclude.html


Originally Posted by urinmyseat (Post 3294866)
Has no long term safety profile.

Not a false statement per se, but it’s equally correct to say that there has been no evidence to suggest, at this point, that they aren’t safe.


Originally Posted by urinmyseat (Post 3294866)
And is labeled as the exit metric for this modern rendition of 1984???

I’ll give you this one, I suppose.

ColtF15 09-14-2021 06:33 AM

if we are looking at ‘Nuance’: by definition calling it a vaccine implies inoculation and thus prevents you from getting it. Polio vaccine. Flu shot. Labeling it a vaccine is criminally false at worst and misleading at best.

Ok. 8 months instead of 5. But booster still recommended by the ‘expert’ trusted to save the world.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.pol...dations-507210

I’m still military and have to get it. And of all the things uncle sam has put in my body I’m sure this is on the low end of the threat ladder. I got the shots. Yet there is no benefit. Still gotta mask up. Still can get infected. Unlike anthrax and small pox. Those are covered. Because they are vaccines.

BLOB 09-14-2021 06:36 AM

Does anybody in this thread think they are changing those ignorant “other guy’s” views. People have their minds made up on both sides because they know the one real infallible truth.

Shaman 09-14-2021 08:14 AM

[QUOTE=urinmyseat;3294866]

Originally Posted by Meat Fighter (Post 3294835)
........ labeled by the government as a selfish lunatic.

This isn't about science or medicine, this is cultish behavior.


Ding, ding, ding, we have a winner! All you folks who know more than the rest of us, and feel the superior need to chastise those who question... What part of the above list is false?


Now I wouldn't go so far as to call anyone a lunatic, but there does seem to be some kind of psychosis.

Those who ascribe to your line of thinking literally believe no one does or can know more than you do. Believing that your cursory perusal of information gleaned from the most dubious of sources qualifies you to argue with anyone even those who are experts in their field. The people challenging this line of ego driven selfish BS aren't speaking as experts on infectious disease they're replying with guidance given by SMEs.

The worst part is you just wont stop crowing about it.

Meat Fighter 09-14-2021 08:19 AM

[QUOTE=Shaman;3295001]

Originally Posted by urinmyseat (Post 3294866)





Now I wouldn't go so far as to call anyone a lunatic, but there does seem to be some kind of psychosis.



Those who ascribe to your line of thinking literally believe no one does or can know more than you do. Believing that your cursory perusal of information gleaned from the most dubious of sources qualifies you to argue with anyone even those who are experts in their field. The people challenging this line of ego driven selfish BS aren't speaking as experts on infectious disease they're replying with guidance given by SMEs.



The worst part is you just wont stop crowing about it.

Let me simplify this...

If the shot does not prevent transmission...

1. Then what is the justification for mandating it?

2. How do you prevent transmission with a treatment that does not prevent transmission? https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...c066962ec7.jpg

Sent from my SM-G970U1 using Tapatalk

ClncClarence 09-14-2021 08:37 AM

[QUOTE=Meat Fighter;3295004]

Originally Posted by Shaman (Post 3295001)
Let me simplify this...

If the shot does not prevent transmission...

1. Then what is the justification for mandating it?

2. How do you prevent transmission with a treatment that does not prevent transmission?

The fundamental flaw in your argument is that you are insinuating that because the vaccines do not completely prevent transmission, that they are useless. This is just simply not true, and they don’t need to be 100% effective to mitigate the problem.

PEOPLE WHO ARE VACCINATED ARE SIGNIFICANTLY LESS LIKELY TO ACQUIRE AND/OR TRANSMIT THE VIRUS, END UP IN THE HOSPITAL, OR DIE.

What part of that do you not understand?

I don’t agree with mandates, but why can’t you just admit that the vaccines are helpful?

Shaman 09-14-2021 08:40 AM

[QUOTE=Meat Fighter;3295004]

Originally Posted by Shaman (Post 3295001)
Let me simplify this...

If the shot does not prevent transmission...

1. Then what is the justification for mandating it?

2. How do you prevent transmission with a treatment that does not prevent transmission? https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...c066962ec7.jpg

Sent from my SM-G970U1 using Tapatalk

no vaccine prevents transmission. That's not what vaccines do man. This is basic stuff. Vaccines are designed to prompt an immune response. The efficacy of the vaccine indicates how effective the immune response, but viruses can evolve and mutate. Doesn't mean vaccine isn't working.

It's not a conspiracy the bug decided it wants to fight so we have to change tactics. For goodness sakes this isn't that hard to grasp without creating ideological boogeyman and assertions of mind control.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:17 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands