![]() |
Pay Banding
Is there a discussion to be had regarding pay banding?
In the past, our WB pay rates were compared with the legacy 777/747; our NB rates were compared with 757/767. For this TA, they have both dropped an entire pay band at the legacies. The WB is now comparable to the 757/767 and the NB is now comparable to the A319/A220. Would it benefit us more to have each aircraft pay its own rate to avoid setting the precedent of having such mediocre rates? Couldn’t such a low 777 rate hurt us in downline contracts and indicate that as cargo pilots we are worth less and willing to accept less? I ran an example where the 777 set the bar and was equal to the new AA rates. From there the respective rates were 757 at 85%, Airbus at 88%, 767 at 92%, and MD at 95%. For 2027, we ended with the following: 777 - $488 MD - $464 767 - $449 Airbus - $429 757 - $415 I felt like those rates were much more tolerable than the current TA. I’m on the bus FWIW. Fire Away. |
Historically our Airbus and 767 have always pattern bargained with the 747, 777 and 787 fleets of other companies. To stop doing that now would be a concession. What would we get for that?
|
Originally Posted by threeighteen
(Post 3664378)
Historically our Airbus and 767 have always pattern bargained with the 747, 777 and 787 fleets of other companies. To stop doing that now would be a concession. What would we get for that?
|
Originally Posted by threeighteen
(Post 3664378)
Historically our Airbus and 767 have always pattern bargained with the 747, 777 and 787 fleets of other companies. To stop doing that now would be a concession. What would we get for that?
|
Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
(Post 3664374)
Is there a discussion to be had regarding pay banding?
In the past, our WB pay rates were compared with the legacy 777/747; our NB rates were compared with 757/767. For this TA, they have both dropped an entire pay band at the legacies. The WB is now comparable to the 757/767 and the NB is now comparable to the A319/A220. Would it benefit us more to have each aircraft pay its own rate to avoid setting the precedent of having such mediocre rates? Couldn’t such a low 777 rate hurt us in downline contracts and indicate that as cargo pilots we are worth less and willing to accept less? I ran an example where the 777 set the bar and was equal to the new AA rates. From there the respective rates were 757 at 85%, Airbus at 88%, 767 at 92%, and MD at 95%. For 2027, we ended with the following: 777 - $488 MD - $464 767 - $449 Airbus - $429 757 - $415 I felt like those rates were much more tolerable than the current TA. I’m on the bus FWIW. Fire Away. it was said that The NC brought it to the MEC and the MEC shut it down since we had just had the realignment bid and people bid with one pay structure and thought it wouldn’t be fair to change it right after the bid. |
Originally Posted by BlueMoon
(Post 3664400)
At a 2nd MEM road show this was discussed.
it was said that The NC brought it to the MEC and the MEC shut it down since we had just had the realignment bid and people bid with one pay structure and thought it wouldn’t be fair to change it right after the bid. |
Originally Posted by Precontact
(Post 3664405)
Then why not make the effective date for this later in the future?
|
Originally Posted by BlueMoon
(Post 3664409)
I think in order to do this we need to fix how we bid since it is almost impossible to laterally move.
|
Originally Posted by CloudSailor
(Post 3664459)
A point to remember right now: our 2015 NC gave away passover pay for SDP. Well, we voted it in is more accurate. Huge, huge concession regarding our system bidding. Sold at the roadshows as a non-issue.
Ask 757 LCAs/Flex’s how that supposedly innocuous change affected their total pay throughout the year. In TRANSPARENCY, Integrity and Unity (for Everyone), DLax |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:26 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands