![]() |
Originally Posted by Tuck
(Post 3934187)
The fact half the meetings end because loss of quorum tells you how AFU this MEC is - worst in 20 years. Zero progress, zero leadership - thanks TC.
What happened to that "direct line" JG told us he had to the NMB? Why in the world does he need a formal letter - I figured he'd have Beebe on the phone in a minute with an answer. Oh unless that was all bull**** and we are right back where we were in March of 24 - having to plead for more meetings because we haven't figured this **** out. never be fully unified at this airline. Go ahead and recall the MEC and delay a new retirement another few years. |
Originally Posted by TsimShaTsui
(Post 3934366)
I would ask you and everyone to stop arguing and row in the same direction, and try to have some semblance of unity, but that will never happen. The truth is, Tuck, that you and a good minority of the crew force will gladly vote yes on anything put before you so long as it has a pension bump and maybe a small pay raise. They could shut this place down and furlough everyone in exchange for $30K a year extra and you would vote yes. That’s the fundamental issue and that’s why we will
never be fully unified at this airline. Go ahead and recall the MEC and delay a new retirement another few years. |
Originally Posted by Pilotguy21
(Post 3934477)
I’ve tried this line for 2 years. You are correct but they will never listen. Until we find a retirement solution to switch to that makes everyone happy instead of one that incentivizes single issue voting decisions to switch to we will always be divided. Can be as simple as just tying automatic raises to the pension. Or making pension raises retroactive back to amenable date. Both would eliminate the incentive to vote based on a single issue.
|
Originally Posted by Pilotguy21
(Post 3934477)
I’ve tried this line for 2 years. You are correct but they will never listen. Until we find a retirement solution to switch to that makes everyone happy instead of one that incentivizes single issue voting decisions to switch to we will always be divided. Can be as simple as just tying automatic raises to the pension. Or making pension raises retroactive back to amenable date. Both would eliminate the incentive to vote based on a single issue.
There are reasons you can't have an unlimited cap on a pension. If you listen to what the NC puts out, you would know why they can't make pension raises retroactive. You seem to be a single issue voter, and have said that if our rates are one nickel less that Delta's, it's a NO from you. So why is your single issue more important than someone else's? I know, because you only care about rowing in the same direction if they let you decide the direction. How about you get on board and stop negotiating against our NC! |
Originally Posted by JustInFacts
(Post 3934497)
There you go rowing in your own direction again. The MEC and NC have said that they are using polling data to ask for what the majority want. The NC has said that their retirement ask has been to keep the A plan for all pilots. So, every time you try to negotiate in public for something else, you are being divisive.
There are reasons you can't have an unlimited cap on a pension. If you listen to what the NC puts out, you would know why they can't make pension raises retroactive. You seem to be a single issue voter, and have said that if our rates are one nickel less that Delta's, it's a NO from you. So why is your single issue more important than someone else's? I know, because you only care about rowing in the same direction if they let you decide the direction. How about you get on board and stop negotiating against our NC! Keep the pension. Doesn’t change that we must find a way to eliminate single issue yes votes. Since the pension is truly the only one that exists because of retirement dates, that’s the biggie that needs to be reevaluated. I don’t even blame the voters to be honest. What else are they realistically supposed to do? The system is what we should be mad at and what we have to change. |
Originally Posted by 2BEER
(Post 3934491)
Wait… is it amenable or amendable?
|
Originally Posted by Pilotguy21
(Post 3934521)
Industry standard pay isn’t even a discussion. NC thinks the same thing.
Keep the pension. Doesn’t change that we must find a way to eliminate single issue yes votes. Since the pension is truly the only one that exists because of retirement dates, that’s the biggie that needs to be reevaluated. I don’t even blame the voters to be honest. What else are they realistically supposed to do? The system is what we should be mad at and what we have to change. |
Originally Posted by JustInFacts
(Post 3934526)
And the NC has a retirement plan. So, are you going to row with them or are you going to keep rowing against them?
Would love to hear your thoughts on if my fears are valid or not that single item voting issues are harmful to our unity… |
Originally Posted by Pilotguy21
(Post 3934532)
Everything is on the table until a TA is signed.
|
Originally Posted by EMBFlyer
(Post 3934563)
Tell me you don't know how Section 6 works without telling me you don't know how Section 6 works.
He’s not implying every section of the contract is open to negotiation. |
Old guys get a clue
I get such a kick out of the 60+ crowd saying "it's been two years and no progress". Want to know why there's no "progress"? Because you folks think that somehow, some way the junior guys are eventually going to cave in to a concessionary contract with below industry pay and back pay and scope concessions. It's not going to happen. Watching the NC do GOD'S WORK while you people sit there and complain about them got old months ago. Now we just sit back and watch you retire one by one on contract 2015. But you got a pound of flesh on a What's App texting group!
Here's another one. We are 700 pilots lighter on the seniority list, but the contract continues to be valued the same as 2023 by the company and NMB. Gee wiz, that's unusual. You old guys that got the pension increase dangled in front of you have a choice. Get behind what's happening so everyone can be taken care of, or you will continue to drop like flies on the 2015 contract. It's very straight forward. As the lovely people on the SM text group say "it's just business", right? Well, there's your "business decision". Leave on 2015, or get with the program. Because you aren't a majority. Ok, bye. |
Nice post glad to see you are all in for yourself. You’re so clueless that the company is kicking your ass. The MEC is doing the company’s work for them. Didn’t know the NC is like the Blues Brothers.
|
Originally Posted by max8222
(Post 3934773)
Nice post glad to see you are all in for yourself. You’re so clueless that the company is kicking your ass. The MEC is doing the company’s work for them. Didn’t know the NC is like the Blues Brothers.
|
Originally Posted by easyflyer
(Post 3934766)
I get such a kick out of the 60+ crowd saying "it's been two years and no progress". Want to know why there's no "progress"? Because you folks think that somehow, some way the junior guys are eventually going to cave in to a concessionary contract with below industry pay and back pay and scope concessions. It's not going to happen. Watching the NC do GOD'S WORK while you people sit there and complain about them got old months ago. Now we just sit back and watch you retire one by one on contract 2015. But you got a pound of flesh on a What's App texting group!
Here's another one. We are 700 pilots lighter on the seniority list, but the contract continues to be valued the same as 2023 by the company and NMB. Gee wiz, that's unusual. You old guys that got the pension increase dangled in front of you have a choice. Get behind what's happening so everyone can be taken care of, or you will continue to drop like flies on the 2015 contract. It's very straight forward. As the lovely people on the SM text group say "it's just business", right? Well, there's your "business decision". Leave on 2015, or get with the program. Because you aren't a majority. Ok, bye. They've so successfully annoyed a large part of the pilot group over the years with their pithy little comments and their “all for me, none for you” approach to TA .9, a lot of us would vote no again just out of spite. 130k club, anyone? |
Originally Posted by TsimShaTsui
(Post 3934366)
I would ask you and everyone to stop arguing and row in the same direction, and try to have some semblance of unity, but that will never happen. The truth is, Tuck, that you and a good minority of the crew force will gladly vote yes on anything put before you so long as it has a pension bump and maybe a small pay raise. They could shut this place down and furlough everyone in exchange for $30K a year extra and you would vote yes. That’s the fundamental issue and that’s why we will
never be fully unified at this airline. Go ahead and recall the MEC and delay a new retirement another few years. |
Originally Posted by jackryan
(Post 3934779)
Bravo. LOUDER for the SM in the back.
They've so successfully annoyed a large part of the pilot group over the years with their pithy little comments and their “all for me, none for you” approach to TA .9, a lot of us would vote no again just out of spite. 130k club, anyone? |
Maybe they should use their unified selves against the company and not against fellow pilots. Pretty much sounds like they are not all in except for themselves.
|
Originally Posted by max8222
(Post 3934850)
Maybe they should use their unified selves against the company and not against fellow pilots. Pretty much sounds like they are not all in except for themselves.
|
Originally Posted by max8222
(Post 3934850)
Maybe they should use their unified selves against the company and not against fellow pilots. Pretty much sounds like they are not all in except for themselves.
company… SM… same thing. |
Jerk Ryan, You tough guys are getting played by the company and don’t even know it.
|
Originally Posted by max8222
(Post 3934871)
Jerk Ryan, You tough guys are getting played by the company and don’t even know it.
|
Originally Posted by Pilotguy21
(Post 3934881)
All the guys sadly retiring with no pension raise are the ones getting played. It’s a shame.
|
Originally Posted by Dakota
(Post 3934885)
"Never woulda been hired if it weren't for COVID" have selfishly screwed over HUNDREDS of pilots with no plan and NO HOPE of ever getting a TA. It's a shame.
|
the guys sadly retiring with no pension raise are the ones getting played. It’s a shame.
Really, they are the ones holding things up? Look in the mirror. They ones retiring are the ones sadly getting screwed. TC and his group of tough guys sure are showing the NMB and the company. Who got played on the recent no tie joke? I know TC has retired but I am sure his lackeys have him on speed dial. |
Originally Posted by max8222
(Post 3934890)
the guys sadly retiring with no pension raise are the ones getting played. It’s a shame.
Really, they are the ones holding things up? Look in the mirror. They ones retiring are the ones sadly getting screwed. TC and his group of tough guys sure are showing the NMB and the company. Who got played on the recent no tie joke? I know TC has retired but I am sure his lackeys have him on speed dial. |
The ones that retired more than a year ago didn’t get played. They just were a victim of the system. The ones retiring since the new MEC took over are the ones getting screwed. Oh by the way you are getting screwed too. How’s that BLG going?
|
Originally Posted by Dakota
(Post 3934885)
"Never woulda been hired if it weren't for COVID" have selfishly screwed over HUNDREDS of pilots with no plan and NO HOPE of ever getting a TA. It's a shame.
|
I am not talking about TA 1 getting voted down. I am talking about the fits in power now. Most of them got voted in because of poor union rules. Kinda like the company taking advantage of the contract.
|
IDGAF lewser
Originally Posted by max8222
(Post 3934940)
I am not talking about TA 1 getting voted down. I am talking about the fits in power now. Most of them got voted in because of poor union rules. Kinda like the company taking advantage of the contract.
Dude, it is hilarious watching you try to defend yourself and your chums trying to rob the rest of the seniority list on the way out the door. Face the issue at hand head on. The TA was garbage, and if you don't get behind something for everyone you'll check out shortly with no pension increase. And IDGAF mister $130k club. Ok, bye. |
Dude you have it backwards and other ALPA carriers do not vote like we do. Each blick should have control of their block. Don’t worry FedEx will do a bit g hire again and I am sure that group will have learned from your loser group to screw you over too.
Don’t worry I will be fine. Too bad you will have a career of getting screwed. A few angry chumps like yourself will be the losers and n this battle. Nice job being a bunch of one ways. Guess the truth hurt so you got fired up and put down your gaming set in your moms basement. |
Originally Posted by Dakota
(Post 3934885)
"Never woulda been hired if it weren't for COVID" have selfishly screwed over HUNDREDS of pilots with no plan and NO HOPE of ever getting a TA. It's a shame.
|
Originally Posted by Pilotguy21
(Post 3934887)
The pilots had tons of leverage during Covid before lots of us were even here or were on probation. You missed your chance
|
Originally Posted by max8222
(Post 3934948)
Dude you have it backwards and other ALPA carriers do not vote like we do. Each blick should have control of their block. Don’t worry FedEx will do a bit g hire again and I am sure that group will have learned from your loser group to screw you over too.
|
[acecrackshot;3934956]Which pilots will be making the value that allows the senior pilots not to enjoy a trip to the PBGC? You think that Fedex won't maneuver to its maximum benefit to drop that pension requirement?l
Shows how ignorant you are of our A fund. Big mouth little brain. |
Originally Posted by max8222
(Post 3934850)
Maybe they should use their unified selves against the company and not against fellow pilots. Pretty much sounds like they are not all in except for themselves.
I mean, if that's not leadership, I don't know what is. |
Lies lies lies
Originally Posted by max8222
(Post 3934948)
Dude you have it backwards and other ALPA carriers do not vote like we do. Each blick should have control of their block. Don’t worry FedEx will do a bit g hire again and I am sure that group will have learned from your loser group to screw you over too.
Don’t worry I will be fine. Too bad you will have a career of getting screwed. A few angry chumps like yourself will be the losers and n this battle. Nice job being a bunch of one ways. Guess the truth hurt so you got fired up and put down your gaming set in your mom's basement. |
Maybe you should reread about what I said about furloughs. Bad mouthing senior guys and wanting them to go suck it,then when I turn the tides and said maybe we should furlough your thong went way up your crack.
|
Originally Posted by max8222
(Post 3934965)
Maybe you should reread about what I said about furloughs. Bad mouthing senior guys and wanting them to go suck it,then when I turn the tides and said maybe we should furlough your thong went way up your crack.
|
Originally Posted by dsevo
(Post 3934966)
Having a few cocktails? You’re coming across as an even bigger ******** than usual, which is quite a feat. I really hope the junior folks at FDX dick stomp your type.
So it is ok for junior to crap all over the senior. I want a fair contract for all. But some in here want a contract for themselves but have no clue other than bashing other pilots. Funny they don’t know who the enemy is. |
Originally Posted by max8222
(Post 3934968)
Sounds like you are not even a FedEx pilot. Go crawl back in your hole.
So it is ok for junior to crap all over the senior. I want a fair contract for all. But some in here want a contract for themselves but have no clue other than bashing other pilots. Funny they don’t know who the enemy is. But the SM is a massive cancer within this pilot group. Company apologists— now that is scary. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:31 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands