![]() |
Originally Posted by flythefrontier
(Post 2143224)
Was told FDX was going to start hiring 70/month this fall for the next 5 years!! True story??
While passing through the schoolhouse last month we were told hiring plans are to continue 40/mo until Oct then increase to 60/mo. |
Originally Posted by Albief15
(Post 2143015)
I was on a trip with my FO--a former Ryan Air check airman with gobs of hours--when he was awarded 757 captain on this last bid.
Thanks |
Originally Posted by flythefrontier
(Post 2143224)
Was told FDX was going to start hiring 70/month this fall for the next 5 years!! True story??
|
Originally Posted by Swedish Blender
(Post 2143526)
Is it Scotty B? Heard through the coconut telegraph he was the junior award.
Thanks |
Originally Posted by Rightseatpro
(Post 2143528)
Unfortunately, no. Only ~180-200 retirements per year for the next bunch of years. Unless the airline is doubling in size in the next few years, whoever told you that is wrong.
|
Originally Posted by Rightseatpro
(Post 2143528)
Unfortunately, no. Only ~180-200 retirements per year for the next bunch of years. Unless the airline is doubling in size in the next few years, whoever told you that is wrong.
|
Originally Posted by HIFLYR
(Post 2143609)
Been here 26 years and they never know what the pilot hiring numbers are from year to year. It usually goes from no hiring to oh crap we need 600 in a year.
This is the only true and (ironically) accurate post in this thread about hiring. |
Originally Posted by HIFLYR
(Post 2143609)
Been here 26 years and they never know what the pilot hiring numbers are from year to year. It usually goes from no hiring to oh crap we need 600 in a year.
Originally Posted by BlackKnight
(Post 2143729)
This is the only true and (ironically) accurate post in this thread about hiring.
While I agree with both of these statements, it's not at all clear to me how Management gets hiring numbers so wrong over and over again? Not enough simulators (how can that happen?), 4.a.2.b, then stop hiring, then trim the entire company costs by x%, then HIRE, HIRE, HIRE, HIRE. We seems to go from unable to fly the known schedule due to lack of pilots to what's the most we can hire for the next 3-5 years. Who's running this "clown show"? Aircraft orders require years of advance planning, age 65 retirements are a known, the only "unknown, unknown" is fleet growth and it seems that we might have an entire department to massage those numbers? Would professional managers do a better job than pilots who prefer not to fly? Enquiring minds want to know? :eek: |
Originally Posted by MaydayMark
(Post 2143764)
Would professional managers do a better job than pilots who prefer not to fly? Enquiring minds want to know?
:eek: My impression of some of this mis-management is that it's occurring outside (above) flight operations. I think you're giving our pilot managers credit for more influence than they really have on the manning decisions. "Professional managers"? as in non-pilots who've never flown a single flight in our system? I don't think any of us would benefit from having positions currently held by pilots filled with folks who can't possibly relate to the daily challenges we face. |
agree: be careful what you wish for. The environmental committee's report on the systematic removal of airframe Hepa filters is disheartening to say the least. Back side of the clock flying, with stidy after study showing the negative health effects. Requests for longevity data ignored by the union (I've heard anywhere from ten to thirty months on average retirement months before death). the optimizer destroying our quality of life. our A-fund devaluation over time. our hourly pay is no longer industry leading. But hey, we have new iPads and we now get birthday cards. Gotta go now and brush up my resume. Time to move on.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:43 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands