Airline Pilot Central Forums
1  2  3  4  5  6 
Page 3 of 6
Go to

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   FedEx (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/fedex/)
-   -   Retirement letter to FDX MEC (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/fedex/84538-retirement-letter-fdx-mec.html)

Tractor Bob 10-19-2014 11:29 AM

I agree with all the above.

It would be interesting to ask the ups guys on the forum how it works there. UPS moves aircrew around on ups planes. Some of those planes are 767s configured like ours. Thus, all cockpit. Thus, captains have the right to deny. Do they? Or is the contract written in a way to allow the company to move aircrew. I don't know. But I am certain FDXwants to do just that

TonyC 10-19-2014 12:31 PM

I may be wrong, but I'm fairly certain the "FARs" trump any CBA or FOM.






.

MaxKts 10-19-2014 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tractor Bob (Post 1749391)
I agree with all the above.

It would be interesting to ask the ups guys on the forum how it works there. UPS moves aircrew around on ups planes. Some of those planes are 767s configured like ours. Thus, all cockpit. Thus, captains have the right to deny. Do they? Or is the contract written in a way to allow the company to move aircrew. I don't know. But I am certain FDXwants to do just that

AFAIK UPS does not have intrusion resistant doors on their a/c.

FXDX 12-23-2017 01:41 PM

Might be time to dust off this nugget. Link in the OP is very interesting reading.

FXDX 12-23-2017 01:44 PM

Mods: could we please get this old thread moved to the FedEx sub forum?

Thanks

USMCFDX 01-01-2018 09:45 AM

It is also interesting that one of the signatories is also a current negotiating committee member and a former R&I Chair.

DLax85 01-04-2018 11:10 AM

Yes - very interesting.

Moderators - please move this to FedEx sub-forum.

I’m unsure if FedEx had its own sub-forum when this was originally posted

kronan 01-04-2018 02:11 PM

It is interesting reading, but in no way pertinent to what is being contemplated.

It is not A plan to a bigger B plan.
Instead it is A plan for a differently calculated A plan, while retaining our 8/9% current B plan

DLax85 01-04-2018 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kronan (Post 2495600)
It is interesting reading, but in no way pertinent to what is being contemplated.

It is not A plan to a bigger B plan.
Instead it is A plan for a differently calculated A plan, while retaining our 8/9% current B plan

In no way pertinent...??

You still don’t understand on how benefits will be accrued under a Variable Plan

There are 4 main concerns in the opening of this letter

#3 and #4 are still valid under the change from our traditional DB Plan to an Accural-Base Variable Benefit Plan

I’m sure there are many other relevant parts to the letter, but too late in the day

More research and analysis to follow

DLax85 01-04-2018 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnightFlyer (Post 1748900)

....Bump, for those who want to find the link more quickly, and avoid the minor thread creap regarding 777 Jumpseat’s


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:48 PM.
1  2  3  4  5  6 
Page 3 of 6
Go to


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons

Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands