Retirement letter to FDX MEC
#1
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
#5
And I can't believe anybody would vote for it. This is like PIBS.....a total deal breaker. Until someone shows me evidence that this is more than a rumor from our little sewing circle........I won't put too much stock in it. That doesn't mean the suits don't want it (what better way to fund their bonuses and executive retirement plans?) but they want lots of stuff. One is to divide us and get us arguing amongst ourselves. How they doin'?
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 260
There is a lot more than appears on this and the MEC chairmans last comm on this was an effort to distance himself from how this "offer" came to be. Methinks he doth protest too much.
Some reps actually weren't opposed...you notice many havent given their position on it.
Some reps actually weren't opposed...you notice many havent given their position on it.
#7
Due Diligence Definitions
1.General: Measure of prudence, responsibility, and diligence that is expected from, and ordinarily exercised by, a reasonable and prudent person under the circumstances.
2.Business: Duty of a firm's directors and officers to act prudently in evaluating associated risks in all transactions.
3.Investing: Duty of the investor to gather necessary information on actual or potential risks involved in an investment.
4.
Negotiating: Duty of each party to confirm each other's expectations and understandings, and to independently verify the abilities of the other to fulfill the conditions and requirements of the agreement. Also called reasonable diligence.
#8
Thanks to you all for putting a professional response to a horrible idea being pushed by our officers and some MEC members. As I said in another post, those who would propose such a damaging change to our retirement system must be held accountable by the membership and the MEC as a whole.
#9
Thanks to you all for putting a professional response to a horrible idea being pushed by our officers and some MEC members. As I said in another post, those who would propose such a damaging change to our retirement system must be held accountable by the membership and the MEC as a whole.
#10
If the chairman hadn't commented and distanced himself and the MEC from this "rumor", would you then criticize him for not doing so?
Seems like lots of innuendo and not much substance here. Have an agenda or axe to grind?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post