Retirement letter to FDX MEC
10-19-2014, 11:29 AM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: MD11
Posts: 227
I agree with all the above.
It would be interesting to ask the ups guys on the forum how it works there. UPS moves aircrew around on ups planes. Some of those planes are 767s configured like ours. Thus, all cockpit. Thus, captains have the right to deny. Do they? Or is the contract written in a way to allow the company to move aircrew. I don't know. But I am certain FDXwants to do just that
It would be interesting to ask the ups guys on the forum how it works there. UPS moves aircrew around on ups planes. Some of those planes are 767s configured like ours. Thus, all cockpit. Thus, captains have the right to deny. Do they? Or is the contract written in a way to allow the company to move aircrew. I don't know. But I am certain FDXwants to do just that
10-19-2014, 01:55 PM
#23
Part Time Employee
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
Originally Posted by Tractor Bob
I agree with all the above.
It would be interesting to ask the ups guys on the forum how it works there. UPS moves aircrew around on ups planes. Some of those planes are 767s configured like ours. Thus, all cockpit. Thus, captains have the right to deny. Do they? Or is the contract written in a way to allow the company to move aircrew. I don't know. But I am certain FDXwants to do just that
It would be interesting to ask the ups guys on the forum how it works there. UPS moves aircrew around on ups planes. Some of those planes are 767s configured like ours. Thus, all cockpit. Thus, captains have the right to deny. Do they? Or is the contract written in a way to allow the company to move aircrew. I don't know. But I am certain FDXwants to do just that
01-04-2018, 02:11 PM
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 2,418
It is interesting reading, but in no way pertinent to what is being contemplated.
It is not A plan to a bigger B plan.
Instead it is A plan for a differently calculated A plan, while retaining our 8/9% current B plan
It is not A plan to a bigger B plan.
Instead it is A plan for a differently calculated A plan, while retaining our 8/9% current B plan
01-04-2018, 08:15 PM
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,191
Originally Posted by kronan
It is interesting reading, but in no way pertinent to what is being contemplated.
It is not A plan to a bigger B plan.
Instead it is A plan for a differently calculated A plan, while retaining our 8/9% current B plan
It is not A plan to a bigger B plan.
Instead it is A plan for a differently calculated A plan, while retaining our 8/9% current B plan
You still don’t understand on how benefits will be accrued under a Variable Plan
There are 4 main concerns in the opening of this letter
#3 and #4 are still valid under the change from our traditional DB Plan to an Accural-Base Variable Benefit Plan
I’m sure there are many other relevant parts to the letter, but too late in the day
More research and analysis to follow
01-04-2018, 08:32 PM
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,191
Originally Posted by KnightFlyer
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
