Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   FedEx (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/fedex/)
-   -   FDX-Fruitful Week? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/fedex/89898-fdx-fruitful-week.html)

VSTOLG4 08-10-2015 07:13 AM

My take on the tone of the latest communications is that we will see a TA very soon and I don't think our reps have a taste for concessions. Reading between the lines I got a feel that the two sides have begun to see eye to eye on most issues. That aside I've also heard a few well-informed rumors while sitting behind closed doors that the numbers will look satisfactory to most and the whole package is a step forward for the pilot group. I don't think management is as foolish as some think...they recognize the crossroads we are standing in front of and my gut is that they will choose the road less haggled. I appreciate the grit of this form...it is nice to see the passion and conviction in our group and know that they are ready to step up if the company doesn't recognize the momentum that our pilot group has gathered.

skeebo2 08-10-2015 09:16 AM

' I don't think management is as foolish as some think"
But dont under estimate their greed to them we are a cost center period not people not pilots.

Perhaps but they do think we are foolish. We are divided. Weak
Some of us are greedy so they can get by.

The have better lawyers and IT Penelope angling to make it look good with loop holes like pbs and 4a2b.

PS: the red letter, we have never one one arbitration. the LOA's stank ant they totally srwd us on 380 pay for 777 and 757's

They are not foolish they are better at the game. They are good at stalling. They do have a weakness and its their back hand (like tennis) we have to hit the ball back so they cant forehand smash us.

Jetjok 08-10-2015 09:34 AM

Skeebo2,

Your ideas may be valid, but your presentation stinks. How long does it take to read what you wrote, and correct spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors prior to hitting that "Post Quick Reply" button? Sorry, I don't want to be the spelling police, but your post needs help.

Busdrivr 08-10-2015 09:57 AM


Originally Posted by Jetjok (Post 1946816)
Skeebo2,

Your ideas may be valid, but your presentation stinks. How long does it take to read what you wrote, and correct spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors prior to hitting that "Post Quick Reply" button? Sorry, I don't want to be the spelling police, but your post needs help.

It must be 5 o'clock somewhere.

MeXC 08-10-2015 10:07 AM


Originally Posted by Jetjok (Post 1946816)
Skeebo2,

Your ideas may be valid, but your presentation stinks. How long does it take to read what you wrote, and correct spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors prior to hitting that "Post Quick Reply" button? Sorry, I don't want to be the spelling police, but your post needs help.

Not even close to the Spelling Police, JJ. When one can't even understand what was written without rereading it 3 times, it's a problem.

FDXLAG 08-10-2015 10:38 AM

Skeebo, some of the brothers will always be hating your Compton sound. :)

dotcom 08-10-2015 10:44 PM


Originally Posted by Nightflyer (Post 1946502)
We don't need to strike.

That would play into the hands of the company, who will go to the press and the rest of the employees about how "greedy" we are being by striking.

The news will always spin it in their favor, you can count on it.

If it comes to a cooling off period, all it will take is for us to work to the rule and for everyone to fly their line and nothing more. We are so undermanned, or manned in the wrong places, that a strike is not necessary and would not be to our benefit.

I was told today by an "ask me" guy that the "rumor" is the company lawyers are worried that whatever TA they negotiate, it will not be good enough and we will vote it down.

I hope the company is finally getting smart enough to give us the deal we have repeatedly earned.

If not, I am not afraid to vote no, and if we vote the TA down, than so be it.

I will never vote for a TA that splits the retirement into two groups.

I will never vote for a TA that does not give everyone the 25K that the select few got in 2006.

Everyday the company stalls, increases my expectations as to the quality of the TA that will be required to earn my yes vote.

When will the company realize that they have pushed us too far?

Soon, I hope. It is way, way past time.

+1 One of the best things I have read on here. Wish there was more that felt this way...

pilot141 08-10-2015 11:20 PM

I think our NC has a good handle on what we consider the "No-go" items.

The company has to bring the $$ to the table for anything to get to us for a vote.

And the "pilot bashing" is already going on. Flew with a guy who lives across the street from a GOC guy. He hires the GOC guy's kid to mow his lawn. Last week as he was paying him, the kid said "I hope you guys don't get a pay raise".

Excuse me? The kid then said that if the pilots got a pay raise, then his dad (a GOC guy) would get a pay cut in order to pay for the pilots.

Classic negotiating tactics. They want to cut the GOC guy's pay, but can't justify it. Bingo - the pilots get paid more, so you get a pay cut. Pathetic.

HDawg 08-11-2015 12:45 AM


Originally Posted by pilot141 (Post 1947255)
I think our NC has a good handle on what we consider the "No-go" items.

The company has to bring the $$ to the table for anything to get to us for a vote.

And the "pilot bashing" is already going on. Flew with a guy who lives across the street from a GOC guy. He hires the GOC guy's kid to mow his lawn. Last week as he was paying him, the kid said "I hope you guys don't get a pay raise".

Excuse me? The kid then said that if the pilots got a pay raise, then his dad (a GOC guy) would get a pay cut in order to pay for the pilots.

Classic negotiating tactics. They want to cut the GOC guy's pay, but can't justify it. Bingo - the pilots get paid more, so you get a pay cut. Pathetic.

Tell the kid his dad should have checked the box that said pilot not GOC guy on his Fedex application.

NoHaz 08-11-2015 03:21 AM

tell the kid to tell his Dad you want 5000 lbs more gas in the mower

trashhauler 08-11-2015 03:47 AM


Originally Posted by pilot141 (Post 1947255)
I think our NC has a good handle on what we consider the "No-go" items.

The company has to bring the $$ to the table for anything to get to us for a vote.

And the "pilot bashing" is already going on. Flew with a guy who lives across the street from a GOC guy. He hires the GOC guy's kid to mow his lawn. Last week as he was paying him, the kid said "I hope you guys don't get a pay raise".

Excuse me? The kid then said that if the pilots got a pay raise, then his dad (a GOC guy) would get a pay cut in order to pay for the pilots.

Classic negotiating tactics. They want to cut the GOC guy's pay, but can't justify it. Bingo - the pilots get paid more, so you get a pay cut. Pathetic.

It all makes sense now. A couple of weeks ago I was flying to ANC and requested an extra 2K Lbs of fuel. I called the dispatcher to let him know and for the first time in the 10 years I've been a Capt, he started arguing with me about wether I needed it or not. He went on about the weather, etc and I told him I was putting on the extra 2k lbs. This phone call happened 1:15 before push. 5 mins before push still no fuel. So I acars'ed him and ask where my fuel was, he didn't respond but the fuel truck arrived. We took a 30 min delay because of this. Interestingly enough, we burned all the extra fuel and then some, a thunderstorm parked itself on final in ANC and we broke out around 400 ft. So much for your forcast dude!!

Raptor 08-11-2015 04:17 AM


Originally Posted by trashhauler (Post 1947283)
It all makes sense now. A couple of weeks ago I was flying to ANC and requested an extra 2K Lbs of fuel. I called the dispatcher to let him know and for the first time in the 10 years I've been a Capt, he started arguing with me about wether I needed it or not. He went on about the weather, etc and I told him I was putting on the extra 2k lbs. This phone call happened 1:15 before push. 5 mins before push still no fuel. So I acars'ed him and ask where my fuel was, he didn't respond but the fuel truck arrived. We took a 30 min delay because of this. Interestingly enough, we burned all the extra fuel and then some, a thunderstorm parked itself on final in ANC and we broke out around 400 ft. So much for your forcast dude!!

I've had that happen (dispatcher arguing against any more fuel) a couple of times over the past two months. Has something changed and is driving them towards doing this?

Jetjok 08-11-2015 04:19 AM


Originally Posted by pilot141 (Post 1947255)
I think our NC has a good handle on what we consider the "No-go" items.

The company has to bring the $$ to the table for anything to get to us for a vote.

And the "pilot bashing" is already going on. Flew with a guy who lives across the street from a GOC guy. He hires the GOC guy's kid to mow his lawn. Last week as he was paying him, the kid said "I hope you guys don't get a pay raise".

Excuse me? The kid then said that if the pilots got a pay raise, then his dad (a GOC guy) would get a pay cut in order to pay for the pilots.

Classic negotiating tactics. They want to cut the GOC guy's pay, but can't justify it. Bingo - the pilots get paid more, so you get a pay cut. Pathetic.

Have your bud tell that kid that without a substantial pay raise, he won't be able to afford paying someone to cut his grass. Then fire the moron and hire the kid from down the block. If asked, tell the kid that the other kids' price was lower. Let him learn some basic economics, although it is Memphis, so expectations of learning are minimal.

frozenboxhauler 08-11-2015 05:30 AM


Originally Posted by NoHaz (Post 1947276)
tell the kid to tell his Dad you want 5000 lbs more gas in the mower

First laugh of the day! Thank you, Nohaz. :D

av8rdude 08-11-2015 05:54 AM

I highly doubt the company will cut anyone's pay, regardless of what's in our (eventual) new contract. I wonder who's spreading this bull crap. Could it be that someone trying to poison our working relationship with other employee groups, especially ones we work closely with (like GOC), thinking it will somehow lessen our resolve and make us lower our goals?

I hope you set the kid straight and assured him that any raise we get will have absolutely no effect on his dad's pay.

BlackKnight 08-11-2015 06:28 AM


Originally Posted by HDawg (Post 1947263)
Tell the kid his dad should have checked the box that said pilot not GOC guy on his Fedex application.


He didn't check that box, therein ceases his argument. If he wanted our lifestyle and pay, he should've become a pilot. Then he could've checked that box. I'm not going to feel guilty for what I do, make, or enjoy. We all fought hard to get here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

BlackKnight 08-11-2015 06:29 AM


Originally Posted by frozenboxhauler (Post 1947333)
First laugh of the day! Thank you, Nohaz. :D


"2".

R.O.R.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

FDXLAG 08-11-2015 06:42 AM

Tell the kid to tell his dad to get off his ass and organize a union.

skeebo2 08-11-2015 09:07 AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4vf8N6GpdM

to jet jock and mexc

I had a post not long ago forgot 6 9 tenthousand reads numerous replies. Seems they all get it but you cant so Ill try a diffewrent language

I grew up on the roman side of town were latin was spoken engich is my second language

But when it comes to mgmt baloney im a a roman warrior and wount eat a ship sand wich or mind your ship bird posts

U use agrgumentum ad nausium as a gramma nasi u dis me with the ad hominim and you go on ad infiniteum ergo make a point or quit drinking hateraid.

Full pull 08-11-2015 09:16 AM

This is just the beginning. The company will start more scare rumors to get all employees ****ed at the greedy pilots, loss of jobs, pay cuts, cut in benefits, tarnished company image, loss of shipping contracts, the compition will take market share, these are just the ones I remember. The rumors will rise in direct proportion to the money being talked about at the table.

I don't think we're close to a ta. This is another strategy they've used in the past, make us think we're close then play the union is being unreasonable.

Divide the employes then dived the pilots. Same formula, different contract.

pipe 08-11-2015 09:18 AM


Originally Posted by Raptor (Post 1947295)
I've had that happen (dispatcher arguing against any more fuel) a couple of times over the past two months. Has something changed and is driving them towards doing this?

ASAP Report. Just a brief narrative - especially make sure to put the final burn. We did this the other night and used every drop of 3000 added on a domestic narrowbody flight. FAA reads the ASAP reports. We need to share this info where we can in the interest of flight safety.

Pipe

Overnitefr8 08-11-2015 09:24 AM

I bet GOC would have loved for 40 or so captains to have said they were going to add 3000 lbs. of fuel on a specific night not too long ago. :)

kronan 08-11-2015 10:23 AM

Best answer I've ever heard about fuel disputes is...OK, sounds like you're taking me off the flight, which hotel am I going to...but, but, but

Well, we both have to agree and I think we need an extra 3k and you don't. Since we can't come to an agreement, I'm assuming you intend to replace me with someone who might acquiesce to your plan

HIFLYR 08-11-2015 10:39 AM

I have never had a distpatcher question me adding fuel and I add on probably 1/4 of my flights. I will however not take any stored flight plan routes right up a frontal line anymore. I make them do their job and flight plan according to the weather.

Full pull 08-11-2015 11:39 AM

It doesn't matter what anybody thinks about my gas. I want gas, I get gas, I don't get gas, I go home. Period. In all fairness, nobody's ever questioned me. There has been a time or two I actually felt Goc was relieved whenI put gas on.

machz990 08-12-2015 01:02 PM

Major thread creep going on here.

Flybywyr 08-12-2015 01:27 PM

What days are they meeting this week?

dckozak 08-12-2015 02:36 PM

There was a big meeting today. Didn't attend due to other obligations. Was a "social" last light at a sports bar in Hacks Cross. Very good attendance (free food + pilots = good attendance :D ). Well attended by the MEC and good info, if you could find time to put down the wings.
While rumors suggest good things, don't take your eye off the ball. Several sources suggest we are having very good affect on getting attention from the parts of the organization that can make things happen. Stay tuned, but don't pop the sparkly yet.

Rock 08-12-2015 03:18 PM


Originally Posted by dckozak (Post 1948261)
There was a big meeting today. Didn't attend due to other obligations. Was a "social" last light at a sports bar in Hacks Cross. Very good attendance (free food + pilots = good attendance :D ). Well attended by the MEC and good info, if you could find time to put down the wings.
While rumors suggest good things, don't take your eye off the ball. Several sources suggest we are having very good affect on getting attention from the parts of the organization that can make things happen. Stay tuned, but don't pop the sparkly yet.

Today's meeting was well attended too. Guarded optimism from the MEC that things are finally progressing. Hopefully the progress will continue during negotiations starting tomorrow. But there were good words of caution about the need for the pilot group to stay professional and avoid unnecessary conflict. Based on current manning problems, we have very little to gain and a lot to lose by people saying or doing stupid things while negotiations continue. Sometimes the best offense is not being offensive. This is probably one of those times.

Jetjok 08-12-2015 07:35 PM


Originally Posted by Rock (Post 1948290)
Sometimes the best offense is not being offensive. This is probably one of those times.

Rock, I agree with you, but only to a point, because sometimes the best offense is being offensive. Ask yourself how the "not being offensive" strategy has worked, or not, in the recent past relative to FedEx negotiations.

MaxKts 08-13-2015 03:40 AM


Originally Posted by Jetjok (Post 1948445)
Rock, I agree with you, but only to a point, because sometimes the best offense is being offensive. Ask yourself how the "not being offensive" strategy has worked, or not, in the recent past relative to FedEx negotiations.

Being "offensive" is the negotiating committee's responsibility not the individual pilots. Being "offensive" as an individual can get you time off without pay!

Chuck Turpen 08-13-2015 03:53 AM

One of the main points made by the ALPA lawyer yesterday was to watch what you post on social media so as no to become a hostage.

He also made it quite clear that catchy names and cute avitars on APC do not hide your identity.

Full pull 08-13-2015 07:17 AM

Good, I hope they're paying attention to social media and realize we're ****ed off and tired of the foot dragging.

Baja 08-13-2015 07:58 AM


Originally Posted by Raptor (Post 1946354)
This implies that the first TA will always be the best TA? I don't think that has to hold.

I'm not clear how you got that implication from my post. Of course the first TA should be one that would receive overwhelming approval. And that first TA should have been concluded long ago. I'm pointing to one possible game plan that would see "due process" drag our current negotiations unfinished until after peak.

Albief15 08-13-2015 11:40 AM


Originally Posted by Full pull (Post 1948576)
Good, I hope they're paying attention to social media and realize we're ****ed off and tired of the foot dragging.

I wasn't here for the Red Letter Days, 1998 deals, etc, as I was a postal wave guy. I have never seen such frustration, angst, and "...don't give a $hit..." since I've been here. That gives me mixed emotions.

On the good side--it makes me think we will get a deal. I like that.

On the bad side--how much damage has to occur to a company before they fix things? I had SLF cancelled for a plane strike--on a brand new 767. I saw the picture of the MD11 on its tail. YGTBFSM. I thought we figured out how to prevent that in 1995. How many diverts, service failures, and bad will are we going to generate to save a nickel here and there? I want a contract. I want a good one. I also want a retirement one day and to work for the best company in the world in overnight delivery and world-wide logistics. A dozen years ago I was confident about my future. Today? Well....I think I can make retirement. Do I want my daughter to one day work here? I don't know.

To the management lurkers: Contract blah blah blah contract. You know what you need to do. Do it. What I ask is when this storm is over--invest some skin in the game and fix this ship. You have over 4000 of the most loyal, kool aid drinking team players you could ever want. Treat your line mx and ramps folks with respect, and give them the resources they need. Develop the spine to worry more about doing the job with your eye on the 5 and 10 year vision and not just the quarterly or annual fiscal targets. Nobody wants to sign up to fly for a second rate outfit. Your employees want to work for the best in the business. Take care of business. You had a chance to work behind the scenes and get a fair contract 2 years ago, and you blew it. I put personal credibility and skin in the game saying I thought it was good idea, and I got burned. I am beyond that. But you need to fix this company. Buy some sims. Don't just give safety lip service, but let's decide we will never have another major mishap at FedEx and provide the training to make sure we make good on that pledge. Put some ramp supervisors on the line. Plane strikes and rampers getting killed on the ramp are symptoms of a greater problem. Invest in your people. Shareholders want you to succeed, but so do the people who make all of this possible...both in and out of the cockpit. I am going to be fine....I'll retire out of here in 5, 10, or 15 years and be okay. But we've got sons and daughters who grew up admiring FedEx, and now want to be part of the next generation of Purple. Your actions over the next few months will be a big part of whether we encourage them to come here or if we tell them our best days are over. Personally, I hope we have a lot of good days ahead of us...but the ball is in your court.

Jetjok 08-13-2015 12:41 PM


Originally Posted by MaxKts (Post 1948517)
Being "offensive" is the negotiating committee's responsibility not the individual pilots. Being "offensive" as an individual can get you time off without pay!

Agreed. I wasn't talking about the pilots as individuals, but about the NC and the FX ALPA elected representatives.

flextodaline 08-13-2015 01:39 PM


Originally Posted by Albief15 (Post 1948704)

To the management lurkers: Contract blah blah blah contract. You know what you need to do. Do it. What I ask is when this storm is over--invest some skin in the game and fix this ship. You have over 4000 of the most loyal, kool aid drinking team players you could ever want. Treat your line mx and ramps folks with respect, and give them the resources they need. Develop the spine to worry more about doing the job with your eye on the 5 and 10 year vision and not just the quarterly or annual fiscal targets. Nobody wants to sign up to fly for a second rate outfit. Your employees want to work for the best in the business. Take care of business. You had a chance to work behind the scenes and get a fair contract 2 years ago, and you blew it. I put personal credibility and skin in the game saying I thought it was good idea, and I got burned. I am beyond that. But you need to fix this company. Buy some sims. Don't just give safety lip service, but let's decide we will never have another major mishap at FedEx and provide the training to make sure we make good on that pledge. Put some ramp supervisors on the line. Plane strikes and rampers getting killed on the ramp are symptoms of a greater problem. Invest in your people. Shareholders want you to succeed, but so do the people who make all of this possible...both in and out of the cockpit. I am going to be fine....I'll retire out of here in 5, 10, or 15 years and be okay. But we've got sons and daughters who grew up admiring FedEx, and now want to be part of the next generation of Purple. Your actions over the next few months will be a big part of whether we encourage them to come here or if we tell them our best days are over. Personally, I hope we have a lot of good days ahead of us...but the ball is in your court.

Perfect. +1. 'nuff said

Knots2U 08-13-2015 02:04 PM


Originally Posted by Albief15 (Post 1948704)
I wasn't here for the Red Letter Days, 1998 deals, etc, as I was a postal wave guy. I have never seen such frustration, angst, and "...don't give a $hit..." since I've been here. That gives me mixed emotions.

On the good side--it makes me think we will get a deal. I like that.

On the bad side--how much damage has to occur to a company before they fix things? I had SLF cancelled for a plane strike--on a brand new 767. I saw the picture of the MD11 on its tail. YGTBFSM. I thought we figured out how to prevent that in 1995. How many diverts, service failures, and bad will are we going to generate to save a nickel here and there? I want a contract. I want a good one. I also want a retirement one day and to work for the best company in the world in overnight delivery and world-wide logistics. A dozen years ago I was confident about my future. Today? Well....I think I can make retirement. Do I want my daughter to one day work here? I don't know.

To the management lurkers: Contract blah blah blah contract. You know what you need to do. Do it. What I ask is when this storm is over--invest some skin in the game and fix this ship. You have over 4000 of the most loyal, kool aid drinking team players you could ever want. Treat your line mx and ramps folks with respect, and give them the resources they need. Develop the spine to worry more about doing the job with your eye on the 5 and 10 year vision and not just the quarterly or annual fiscal targets. Nobody wants to sign up to fly for a second rate outfit. Your employees want to work for the best in the business. Take care of business. You had a chance to work behind the scenes and get a fair contract 2 years ago, and you blew it. I put personal credibility and skin in the game saying I thought it was good idea, and I got burned. I am beyond that. But you need to fix this company. Buy some sims. Don't just give safety lip service, but let's decide we will never have another major mishap at FedEx and provide the training to make sure we make good on that pledge. Put some ramp supervisors on the line. Plane strikes and rampers getting killed on the ramp are symptoms of a greater problem. Invest in your people. Shareholders want you to succeed, but so do the people who make all of this possible...both in and out of the cockpit. I am going to be fine....I'll retire out of here in 5, 10, or 15 years and be okay. But we've got sons and daughters who grew up admiring FedEx, and now want to be part of the next generation of Purple. Your actions over the next few months will be a big part of whether we encourage them to come here or if we tell them our best days are over. Personally, I hope we have a lot of good days ahead of us...but the ball is in your court.


I second that emotion. This is probably one of the, if not the best posts I have seen here on APC. I was here for the Red Letter days, the Yellow list, and when Federal Express was simply an amazing place to work. It used to be a passion. Now it's just a job. And what is incredible, is that it would take very little effort on the part of management, to make it an amazing place again. It's simply matter of doing the right thing.
I can't express in words, how much I miss flying for the old Federal Express Corporation.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:14 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands