Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
I hope all the yes voters think about this. >

I hope all the yes voters think about this.

Search
Notices

I hope all the yes voters think about this.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-2015, 09:16 AM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 99
Default I hope all the yes voters think about this.

While this was a fairly generous contract offer -- and FedEx's pilots were already near the top of the industry in pay -- FedEx's management stated that it won't impact the company's projected profit growth trajectory. Other productivity-enhancing initiatives will more than offset the pilots' higher pay.
jetstar1 is offline  
Old 10-19-2015, 09:17 AM
  #2  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 99
Default

Will "MORE THAN OFFSET"
jetstar1 is offline  
Old 10-19-2015, 09:24 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2cylinderdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 732
Default

Originally Posted by jetstar1 View Post
While this was a fairly generous contract offer -- and FedEx's pilots were already near the top of the industry in pay -- FedEx's management stated that it won't impact the company's projected profit growth trajectory. Other productivity-enhancing initiatives will more than offset the pilots' higher pay.
of course you are assuming they meant within the body of the CBA? No way that they are talking about a net of ALL the efficiency programs that FDX Corp is and has been engaged in for many years now.

How do you think they can generate savings for the pay rates alone within the CBA only? Name the new provisions that could save, say 1 billion, over 6 years?
2cylinderdriver is offline  
Old 10-19-2015, 09:38 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
Default

If a person believes the big winners for this TA passing will be shareholders, I have a suggestion for what to do with the signing bonus.
Rock is offline  
Old 10-19-2015, 09:38 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CloudSailor's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,062
Default

To my knowledge, our Block 1 Rep, among others via the Q&A, have been requesting the actual monetary value of the 'gained efficiencies' the company got through our 'gives', to really gauge the true number of the TA.

$1.67B - gained efficiencies = actual value of TA. That's the context in which I read the CFO's commentary on the Motley Fool interview.
CloudSailor is offline  
Old 10-19-2015, 10:32 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

The gained efficiencies of the age change alone, almost pays for what the NC is saying we gained in this TA. And, the lack of A Plan improvement, increased retirement healthcare costs, etc. will drive more to stay.

Company saves $130,000 per year/per pilot for every year a pilot stays after age 60.

So, say 1700 guys retire at age 65, in the next 8 years...

$130,000 X 5 X 1700 = $1.10 Billion
Busboy is offline  
Old 10-19-2015, 01:14 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 500
Default

I do like to see that in the retirement summary info I got recently, our retirement funds are 3 Billion over funded. Just a little amount that adds up to $666,666 for each of our 4500 pilots. I'd say the MEC is right. I don't see how they could pay for an A fund increase. It looks like the company expected to increase the requirements so they've been over funding. Since we did not press hard enough to get to use those funds, now they have a surplus.

Now they can use that extra 3 Billion to buy back more stock. In 2014 when they wanted to buy back stock, they just floated 4 Billion in 4% corporate bonds to pay for it. This is much easier for them than paying 4%. Just get the pilots to fund the stock buybacks.
kwri10s is offline  
Old 10-19-2015, 06:53 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2cylinderdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 732
Default

Originally Posted by Busboy View Post
The gained efficiencies of the age change alone, almost pays for what the NC is saying we gained in this TA. And, the lack of A Plan improvement, increased retirement healthcare costs, etc. will drive more to stay.

Company saves $130,000 per year/per pilot for every year a pilot stays after age 60.

So, say 1700 guys retire at age 65, in the next 8 years...

$130,000 X 5 X 1700 = $1.10 Billion
so you agree there is not anyway possible that this TA has stuff in it that could possibly come close to paying for itself?

BTW your math is not accurate, it would be accurate if every single pilot in your example had at the time the age changed 1) 25 YOS and 2) achieved their high five. We know that is true for many but not anywhere close to all and as such there are now people accruing more YOS and getting to or at least a higher FAE which results in a large amount of extra pension payments over the lifetime of those pilots. Is it a net increase over the potential savings of not paying pensions for up to 5 years? not likely but certainly not a billion dollar nugget.
2cylinderdriver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gunboat
Major
193
06-08-2012 03:31 PM
Flyjets1
Your Photos and Videos
11
01-31-2010 08:41 AM
banja12
Hiring News
17
01-06-2010 08:47 AM
LAfrequentflyer
Hangar Talk
0
09-22-2005 10:27 AM
Gordon C
Major
0
06-29-2005 08:59 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices