Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
Moving Forward Safely & Professionally >

Moving Forward Safely & Professionally

Search
Notices

Moving Forward Safely & Professionally

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-22-2015, 01:57 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Posts: 360
Default Moving Forward Safely & Professionally

Originally Posted by DLax85 View Post
I'm unsure of which emoji (emogi 39) represents, thus I can't fully understand the nature of your question/post


Yes - EVERY DAY!

Couldn't agree more. Having this MINDSET every day is the correct attitude, and your post was well written.

My first comment was purely in jest- you listed all those things and ended with "We should all DO these things each day as professional pilots". I was taking it to the literal sense....

Oh well- it loses any humor (it might have had) when you gotta explain it.
BlackKnight is offline  
Old 10-22-2015, 03:46 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
DLax85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,191
Default

Originally Posted by Nightflyer View Post
I would like to know, from someone who has done it, what happens when you call in fatigued.

1) Can you use your sick bank to pay for your trip?

2) Does your trip just disappear and you don't get paid?

3) How much grief does the company give you for calling in fatigued?

4) Are you put on double secret probation?

5) Does the FAA get involved in any way?

No speculation. I'd like to hear from someone who has actually been through it.
1. Yes. Though IMO you shouldn't have to if caused by a company induced scheduling change, excessive ground/flight delay beyond your control

2. No. The portion you fly may remain on your calendar. If you work none of it, it will disappear from your calendar. You should get paid via sick bank

3. First, that shouldn't affect your decision. It's improper & unsafe to fly fatigued. The company will state they don't give you any --- but that may not be the full story. You'll have to tell the scheduler first, who will pass you off to the Duty Officer. Just calmly state you are too tired to fly and it's unsafe. Safety trumps all else. You may be asked to fill out an "irregularity report" by the company and a "fatigue report" by the union. So what, state the facts --- and reiterate it was a safety issue

4. I don't know --- I doubt it. Double Secret Probation is secret ya know. . But it doesn't matter --- your health & your safety matters. We all need to embrace this concept fully

5. I don't believe the FAA is notified. Now if you feel the need/desire to fill out an ASAP report that report will be reviewed by the company, union & FAA. I think that would be a superb way to let the FAA know of risks to flight safety, which should be identified & mitigated
DLax85 is offline  
Old 10-22-2015, 04:34 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 711
Default

The TA, errrr, new CBA changes that with a Fatigue Event Review Committee (FERC). Simplified, if you call in fatigued, a FERC Pilot is now your point of contact--no longer management. And, the FERC reviews your fatigue call...they can either restore your sick hours used or continue your use of sick hours--depending on the circumstances.
Raptor is offline  
Old 10-22-2015, 04:40 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HDawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 356
Default

Wait a minute, that sounds like a good thing in the CBA. That can't be right.
HDawg is offline  
Old 10-22-2015, 04:45 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

The Feds are notified of Fatigue calls by the company. I don't know to what extent, but it is not to punish you, if anything it is to punish the company. I have done it three times in 14 years (twice Ice storm related in Memphis). Truly no harm no foul as far as I know. The second time I told the scheduler I was tired, I am not flying, if the DO wants me he can call me. He called me 2 minutes later and said good night.

Our new contract does improve the process.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 10-22-2015, 06:15 AM
  #26  
Part Time Employee
 
MaxKts's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
Default

Originally Posted by HDawg View Post
Wait a minute, that sounds like a good thing in the CBA. That can't be right.
It's time to knock off this crap! The NO voters never claimed there wasn't anything good in the TA. The problem was there was too much give compared to the gains. If you can't understand that - maybe you shouldn't have voted!
MaxKts is offline  
Old 10-22-2015, 07:01 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HDawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 356
Default

You are right, since I disagree with you I should not have voted. I'm sorry.
HDawg is offline  
Old 10-22-2015, 08:26 AM
  #28  
Part Time Employee
 
MaxKts's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
Default

Originally Posted by HDawg View Post
You are right, since I disagree with you I should not have voted. I'm sorry.
It has nothing to do with disagreeing. It is the characterization that the NO voters didn't find anything good in the TA. SMH
MaxKts is offline  
Old 10-22-2015, 08:36 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,820
Default

Originally Posted by MaxKts View Post
It has nothing to do with disagreeing. It is the characterization that the NO voters didn't find anything good in the TA. SMH
I agree that it is time to cut this crap out. I hope you will tell the guys on here that are characterizing YES voters in unflattering ways the same thing. Anything else, and your words ring hollow.
pinseeker is offline  
Old 10-22-2015, 09:32 AM
  #30  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

The biggest win for The Company was not the TA itself.

<facepalm>






.
TonyC is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
undflyboy06
Cargo
2
11-28-2008 01:22 PM
JetJock16
Leaving the Career
29
09-20-2008 02:45 AM
thrustborne
Technical
5
04-26-2007 05:40 AM
ockham
Major
109
01-24-2007 04:05 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices